Comparing Two Training Frequencies of Balance Training for Chronic Ankle Instability
1 other identifier
interventional
57
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares two progressive hop-to-stabilization balance (PHSB) training schedules with equal total training volume in people with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Current evidence supports the effectiveness of PHSB training for CAI rehabilitation, but no study has directly compared different training frequencies when total training dose is held constant. Sixty participants with CAI were randomly assigned to three groups: a 4-week group (3 sessions per week, 12 sessions total, n=23), a 6-week group (2 sessions per week, 12 sessions total, n=22), and a waitlist control group (n=12). Each session lasted 20 minutes and followed the standardized PHSB protocol, including single-limb hops to stabilization, hops to stabilization and reach, unanticipated hop to stabilization, and single-limb stance activities with progressive difficulty. The control group received the intervention after study completion. The primary outcomes are sensory organization measured by the Sensory Organization Test (composite score, six condition equilibrium scores, and four sensory ratios for somatosensory, visual, vestibular, and visual preference) and strategy analysis scores, and regional plantar pressure distribution during walking measured by FreeSTEP (peak force normalized to body weight across the first through fifth metatarsal heads, hallux, medial hindfoot, and lateral hindfoot). Secondary outcomes include self-reported ankle function (Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool), dynamic balance (Y-Balance Test and side-hop test), static postural stability during single-leg stance measured by FreeSTEP (center of pressure mean velocity, confidence ellipse area, sway length, anteroposterior and mediolateral standard deviation of COP displacement, and Romberg index calculated as eyes-closed to eyes-open ratio of ellipse area), forefoot-rearfoot and medial-lateral plantar load ratios during walking, ankle range of motion measured by goniometer, and ankle muscle strength assessed by manual muscle testing. This study aims to determine whether different training frequency schedules produce similar or distinct rehabilitation outcomes across sensorimotor, biomechanical, and patient-reported domains, providing evidence for flexible and individualized exercise prescription in CAI management.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 8, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 28, 2026
CompletedMay 28, 2026
May 1, 2026
1.2 years
May 19, 2026
May 22, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)
Self-reported ankle function questionnaire assessing perceived ankle instability during daily and sporting activities. Total score ranges 0-30, with higher scores indicating better ankle stability. A score below 24 indicates chronic ankle instability per International Ankle Consortium criteria. The minimal clinically important difference is 3 points. The Chinese version has demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.815) and test-retest reliability (ICC 0.99).
Baseline (within 1 week before intervention) and post-intervention (within 1 week after completion of the training program)
Y-Balance Test (YBT)
Dynamic balance assessment measuring maximum reach distance in three directions (anterior, posteromedial, posterolateral) during single-leg stance on the affected limb. Reach distances were normalized to limb length and expressed as percentage. Three trials per direction with the best value selected, and the average of three directions used as the final score. Higher scores indicate better dynamic balance.
Baseline (within 1 week before intervention) and post-intervention (within 1 week after completion of the training program)
Secondary Outcomes (9)
SOT Sensory Ratios
Baseline and post-intervention (within 1 week after completion of the training program)
SOT Balance Performance
Baseline and post-intervention (within 1 week after completion of the training program)
Regional Plantar Pressure Distribution During Walking
Baseline and post-intervention (within 1 week after completion of the training program)
Static Postural Stability Parameters During Single-Leg Stance
Baseline and post-intervention (within 1 week after completion of the training program)
Romberg Index
Baseline and post-intervention (within 1 week after completion of the training program)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
4-Week PHSB Training Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received progressive hop-to-stabilization balance training 3 times per week for 4 weeks (12 sessions total, 20 minutes per session). The training protocol included four components: single-limb stance activities with 7 progressive difficulty levels under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions, single-limb hops to stabilization in four directions at three distances (45cm, 68cm, 91cm), hops to stabilization and reach with 7 progressive levels, and unanticipated hop to stabilization using a 9-grid system with 7 progressive levels. Training sessions were scheduled with approximately equal inter-session intervals (48-72 hours between sessions). n=23.
6-Week PHSB Training Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received the same progressive hop-to-stabilization balance training protocol as the 4-week group, but at a frequency of 2 times per week for 6 weeks (12 sessions total, 20 minutes per session). Training content, progression criteria, and difficulty levels were identical to the 4-week group. Training sessions were scheduled with approximately equal inter-session intervals (72-96 hours between sessions).n=22.
Waitlist Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants received no therapeutic intervention during the study period. Health education was provided during the waiting period. All control group participants were offered the PHSB training program upon completion of the study to ensure ethical treatment. n=12.
Interventions
Standardized progressive hop-to-stabilization balance training performed 3 times per week for 4 weeks (12 sessions, 20 minutes per session, 240 minutes total). Training sessions were scheduled with approximately equal inter-session intervals (48-72 hours). The protocol consisted of four components with progressive difficulty levels: (1) single-limb stance activities under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions on firm and foam surfaces with 7 levels, (2) single-limb hops to stabilization in four directions at three distances (45, 68, 91 cm) with 7 levels, (3) hops to stabilization and reach with 7 levels, and (4) unanticipated hop to stabilization using a numbered 9-grid system with 7 levels. Progression occurred when participants completed a level without errors. n=23.
Identical progressive hop-to-stabilization balance training protocol as Intervention 1, performed 2 times per week for 6 weeks (12 sessions, 20 minutes per session, 240 minutes total). Training sessions were scheduled with approximately equal inter-session intervals (72-96 hours). Training content, progression criteria, difficulty levels, and exercise components were the same as the 4-week protocol. The only difference was the distribution of training sessions across a longer period at a lower weekly frequency. n=22.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- History of at least one lateral ankle sprain with inflammatory signs (swelling, pain) and inability to bear weight on the affected side for at least one day after injury, per International Ankle Consortium criteria.
- At least two episodes of giving way, recurrent ankle sprains, or perceived ankle instability within 6 months prior to enrollment.
- Time since first ankle sprain greater than 12 months.
- Time since most recent ankle sprain greater than 3 months.
- No history of fracture or surgery in either lower extremity.
- No other injuries causing inability to bear weight on either lower extremity within the past 3 months.
- Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) score of 24 or below
- Physically active: engaging in at least 30 minutes of moderate or higher intensity physical activity on at least 3 days per week.
- Age 16-49 years.
- Willing to provide written informed consent -
You may not qualify if:
- History of lower extremity surgery or lower extremity fracture affecting lower limb function
- Acute ankle sprain within 6 weeks prior to enrollment
- Foot or ankle immobilization for more than 48 hours within the past 6 months
- Neurological, vestibular, or other medical conditions affecting muscle strength or proprioceptive function
- Currently receiving other rehabilitation treatment for the ankle -
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Utahlead
- Beijing Sport Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Beijing Sport University
Beijing, 100084, China
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Graduate Research Assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2026
First Posted
May 28, 2026
Study Start
November 8, 2023
Primary Completion
January 17, 2025
Study Completion
March 16, 2025
Last Updated
May 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05