NCT05327244

Brief Summary

People with chronic ankle instability (CAI) demonstrate altered gait or walking mechanics which cause people to walk on the outside of their foot and increases the risk of additional ankle sprains, abnormal cartilage strain, and early joint degeneration. Evidence indicates that common treatments for CAI do not impact gait, leaving unresolved impairments that can lead to lifelong disability. Recent lab-based gait retraining with visual and auditory feedback has immediately improved walking mechanics. However, real-world training is hypothesized to generate long-term changes by incorporating short, frequent training sessions over a variety of surfaces. These are key training parameters to produce lasting change. Pilot data using real-world vibration feedback (RW-VF) suggest that a single session immediately improves walking mechanics with changes lasting for up to 5 minutes. Despite promising initial results, there remains a critical need to determine the impact of multiple RW-VF sessions as an initial step to developing a protocol capable of long-term improvements. The purpose of this proposal is to determine the extent to which 2-weeks of RW-VF restores gait biomechanics in those with CAI. Twenty people with CAI will be enrolled and complete a two-week gait retraining protocol with vibration feedback. Walking mechanics before, immediately after, and 1 week and 4 weeks following the training will be compared. These contributions can be significant as positive results will support a paradigm shift in treatments for people with CAI and lay the foundation for large scale clinical trials aimed at optimizing long term gains. The outcomes of future research have the potential to advance evidenced based rehabilitation interventions not only for people with CAI but also for people who have sustained a variety of musculoskeletal injuries as there is strong evidence that other lower extremity pathologies cause lifelong limitations, including changes in walking mechanics which lead to degenerative changes to other joints.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 6, 2022

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 14, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 9, 2022

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 6, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 6, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

June 8, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

April 6, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 6, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

anklewalkingbiofeedback

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Immediate and retained changes in the center of pressure location under the foot at initial contact within the chronic ankle instability group in response to 2-weeks of RWVF gait retraining.

    The location of the center of pressure (COP) under the foot will be collected while participants walk for 1-minute on an instrumented treadmill at each assessment in this repeated measures study (baseline, P-2, F-1, F-4). Data from each stance phase of walking will be divided into 10 equal parts each representing 10% of stance and averaged across all steps. Subphase 1 of the data will be used for the primary outcome as it represents initial contact of gait.

    COP location during walking will be measured at baseline, within 72 hours of completing the intervention (P-2), 1 week after the intervention (F-1), 1 month after the intervention (F-4).

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Immediate and retained changes in the center of pressure location under the foot from 20% to 100% of the walking stance phase within the chronic ankle instability group in response to 2-weeks of RWVF gait retraining.

    COP location during walking will be measured at baseline, within 72 hours of completing the intervention (P-2), 1 week after the intervention (F-1), 1 month after the intervention (F-4).

  • Differences between the COP location in people with CAI following 2-weeks of RWVF gait retraining and the COP location in healthy controls.

    The COP location during walking will be measured following 2-weeks of training (P-2) in the CAI cohort and compared to pre-collected, de-identified healthy control data from a single session.

Study Arms (2)

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

All CAI participants will complete the same intervention and will walk 6, 1-mile paths in the real wold (ie: around campus) with vibration feedback within 2 weeks of baseline assessment. A study team member will accompany each participant during each training.

Other: Real-world vibration feedback gait retraining

Healthy Control

NO INTERVENTION

Posttest data from CAI participants will be compared to de-identified healthy control data collected as part of a previous study. Healthy control participants completed a single research session to collect walking biomechanics using the same methods as this project. They received no further follow up or intervention and the inclusion/ exclusion criteria for this group match those of the chronic ankle instability cohort.

Interventions

Participants will walk with a vibration feedback tool attached to their shoelaces. A small force sensing resistor is taped to the foot bed of the shoe under the lateral foot and a vibration motor is placed over the outside of the ankle with a strap. When a participant walks on the outside of their foot, they will exceed the pressure threshold and activate the feedback which signifies an incorrect foot placement. The feedback is intended to prompt a correct foot placement on the subsequent step. Participants will use the same feedback tool for 6 real world training sessions.

Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 35 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • between the ages of 18 - 35 years
  • will have a history of at least 1 significant lateral ankle sprain which occurred at least 12 months prior to enrollment defines as a sprain which caused at least 1 day of interrupted physical activity
  • have a history of recurrent sprains and/or episodes of "giving way"
  • have a sense of ankle instability measured by a score of ≥ 11 on the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI)
  • have self-reported functional limitations measured by a score of \< 90% of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)-Activities of Daily Living subscale and \< 80% on the FAAM-Sport subscale.

You may not qualify if:

  • evidence of bilateral CAI using the criteria above
  • history of previous surgery in either lower extremity
  • history of a fracture requiring realignment in either lower extremity
  • an acute (\< 12 weeks from enrollment) injury to either lower extremity
  • any condition known to affect gait such as peripheral neuropathy, diabetes, neurological disorders, or neurodegenerative diseases
  • knowingly pregnant.
  • between the ages of 18-35 years
  • no previous history of lower extremity surgery
  • no lower extremity injury history in the past 6 months
  • no history of neurological disorders (i.e.: stroke, cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, etc.)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Waterman BR, Owens BD, Davey S, Zacchilli MA, Belmont PJ Jr. The epidemiology of ankle sprains in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Oct 6;92(13):2279-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01537.

    PMID: 20926721BACKGROUND
  • Gribble PA, Delahunt E, Bleakley CM, Caulfield B, Docherty CL, Fong DT, Fourchet F, Hertel J, Hiller CE, Kaminski TW, McKeon PO, Refshauge KM, van der Wees P, Vicenzino W, Wikstrom EA. Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium. J Athl Train. 2014 Jan-Feb;49(1):121-7. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.1.14. Epub 2013 Dec 30.

    PMID: 24377963BACKGROUND
  • Wikstrom EA, Song K, Tennant JN, Dederer KM, Paranjape C, Pietrosimone B. T1rho MRI of the talar articular cartilage is increased in those with chronic ankle instability. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Apr;27(4):646-649. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.12.019. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

    PMID: 30634032BACKGROUND
  • Gribble PA, Bleakley CM, Caulfield BM, Docherty CL, Fourchet F, Fong DT, Hertel J, Hiller CE, Kaminski TW, McKeon PO, Refshauge KM, Verhagen EA, Vicenzino BT, Wikstrom EA, Delahunt E. Evidence review for the 2016 International Ankle Consortium consensus statement on the prevalence, impact and long-term consequences of lateral ankle sprains. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;50(24):1496-1505. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096189. Epub 2016 Jun 3.

    PMID: 27259753BACKGROUND
  • Torp DM, Thomas AC, Donovan L. External feedback during walking improves measures of plantar pressure in individuals with chronic ankle instability. Gait Posture. 2019 Jan;67:236-241. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.10.023. Epub 2018 Oct 21.

    PMID: 30380508BACKGROUND
  • Donovan L, Feger MA, Hart JM, Saliba S, Park J, Hertel J. Effects of an auditory biofeedback device on plantar pressure in patients with chronic ankle instability. Gait Posture. 2016 Feb;44:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.10.013. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

    PMID: 27004629BACKGROUND
  • Feger MA, Hertel J. Surface electromyography and plantar pressure changes with novel gait training device in participants with chronic ankle instability. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2016 Aug;37:117-124. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 7.

    PMID: 27423026BACKGROUND
  • Yen SC, Corkery MB, Donohoe A, Grogan M, Wu YN. Feedback and Feedforward Control During Walking in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Sep;46(9):775-83. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6403. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

    PMID: 27494057BACKGROUND
  • Feger MA, Hart JM, Saliba S, Abel MF, Hertel J. Gait training for chronic ankle instability improves neuromechanics during walking. J Orthop Res. 2018 Jan;36(1):515-524. doi: 10.1002/jor.23639. Epub 2017 Aug 11.

    PMID: 28653780BACKGROUND
  • Erhart-Hledik JC, Asay JL, Clancy C, Chu CR, Andriacchi TP. Effects of active feedback gait retraining to produce a medial weight transfer at the foot in subjects with symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res. 2017 Oct;35(10):2251-2259. doi: 10.1002/jor.23527. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

    PMID: 28120496BACKGROUND
  • Migel KG, Wikstrom EA. The effect of laboratory and real world gait training with vibration feedback on center of pressure during gait in people with chronic ankle instability. Gait Posture. 2021 Mar;85:238-243. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

    PMID: 33621942BACKGROUND
  • Migel KG, Wikstrom EA. Immediate effects of vibration biofeedback on ankle kinematics in people with chronic ankle instability. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021 Dec;90:105495. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105495. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

    PMID: 34601325BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Kimmery Migel, PT, DPT

    University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: All CAI participants will be assigned to the intervention arm and will all receive the same treatment (6 sessions of RWVF gait retraining in 2-weeks). Posttest data from CAI participants in arm 1 will be compared to data from pre-collected de-identified healthy control data.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2022

First Posted

April 14, 2022

Study Start

June 9, 2022

Primary Completion

April 6, 2023

Study Completion

April 6, 2023

Last Updated

June 8, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Time Frame
starting 9 months and continuing for 36 months following publication
Access Criteria
Investigator has approved IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Locations