Comparing Decidual Inclusion vs. Exclusion in Uterine Suture Techniques During Cesarean Section to Improve Scar Thickness and Reduce Isthmocele Risk in Primiparous Women
DISSUC
The Impact of Decidual Inclusion or Sparing in a Single Unlocked Closure of a Cesarean Uterine Incision: Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
374
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares two ways of closing the uterus during cesarean delivery. In one group, the decidual layer near the uterine cavity is included in the suture. In the other group, this layer is left out. The study will examine whether these two methods differ in how well the uterine scar heals 6 to 9 months after surgery. Women having an elective cesarean delivery will be randomly assigned to one of the two closure methods. Scar healing will be assessed by ultrasound after delivery. The goal is to determine whether one method is associated with better cesarean scar healing and fewer scar defects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 25, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 27, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2029
June 1, 2026
May 1, 2026
2.9 years
August 27, 2025
May 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of participants with a cesarean scar niche measured by ultrasound
Presence of a cesarean scar niche, defined as a myometrial indentation at the cesarean scar site with a depth of at least 2 mm, assessed by postoperative ultrasound. The outcome will be reported as the proportion of participants with a niche in each treatment group.
6 to 9 months post-operation
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Operative time
Periprocedural
Need for additional sutures for hemostasis
Periprocedural
Length of hospital stay
Postoperative day 2
Postoperative pain intensity on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale
Postoperative day 2
Postoperative bleeding
Postoperative day 2
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Decidual Inclusion Closure
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to this arm will undergo elective cesarean delivery with single-layer, non-locked uterine closure in which the cavum-near decidual layer at the uterotomy margin is included in the suture. All other operative steps will be performed according to the standardized study protocol.
Decidual Sparing Closure
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to this arm will undergo elective cesarean delivery with single-layer, non-locked uterine closure in which the cavum-near decidual layer at the uterotomy margin is excluded from the suture. All other operative steps will be performed according to the standardized study protocol.
Interventions
During the cesarean section, the uterine incision is closed with a single-layered, non-locked suture. In this technique, the decidua (the uterine lining) is included in the closure. This means that the endometrial cells are part of the suture, potentially influencing the healing process of the uterine scar. Goal: The idea is that including the decidua may promote better healing and scar formation, reducing the risk of complications such as isthmocele and improving long-term uterine health.
Procedure: In this technique, the uterine incision is also closed using a single-layered non-locked suture, but the decidua is excluded from the closure. The suture is placed only through the myometrium (muscle layer) of the uterus, leaving the decidua out of the scar tissue. Goal: The intent is to observe if sparing the decidua results in better scar healing and a lower risk of isthmocele formation, as well as fewer long-term complications.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Singleton, term pregnancy
- Elective cesarean section before labor onset or membrane rupture
- Maternal age \>18 years
- Ability to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Placenta previa
- Maternal substance abuse or infection
- Suspected placenta accreta
- Diabetes
- one or more prior cesarean section
- Vulnerable participants (e.g., mental health conditions)
- Emergency cesarean sections
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kantonsspital Baden
Baden, Canton of Aargau, 5400, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amr S. Hamza, Assoc. Prof.
Kantonsspital Baden
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc. Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2025
First Posted
May 27, 2026
Study Start
May 25, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 30, 2029
Last Updated
June 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
De-identified individual participant data will not be shared outside the research team because no external data-sharing process has been approved by the ethics committee or institution. Aggregate study results may be shared through publication or presentation.