Can Cesarean Scar Defects be Prevented?
Is Isthmosel Becoming History? The Effect of Three Different Uterotomy Closure
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, uterotomy after cesarean section was performed using 3 different suture techniques and aimed to demonstrate the potential of the baseball suture technique to prevent the isthmusel complication known as cesarean scar defect.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 7, 2025
CompletedJanuary 7, 2025
December 1, 2024
6 months
December 19, 2024
December 30, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Isthmocele was be evaluated
The presence and anatomical location of isthmocele were be evaluated by ultrasonography.
Three months postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Isthmosel (caesarean scar defect )
ACTIVE COMPARATORIsthmosel or caesarean scar defect is a poch-like defect in the myometrium at the isthmic level that is thought that it might occur as a result of insufficient healing process of the uterine incision after caesarean section.
Residual myometrial thickness
ACTIVE COMPARATORThree months after the operation, residual myometrial thickness localization was evaluated by ultrasonography.
Interventions
(Baseball Suturing Technique): A corner suture was placed at the right corner of the incision. Next, the second stitch was placed at the apex of the left corner and tied with a knot. Then, the free end of the suture was cut and running baseball stitch pattern was started. The suturing pattern was performed by taking bites from the inside out through the upper and lower lips of the wound at approximately 1 cm intervals with a 1 cm margin from the wound edges
(Single-Layer Locked Continuous Suturing Technique): A corner suture was placed at the right corner of the incision. Next, the second stitch was placed at the apex of the left corner and tied with a knot. Then, the free end of the suture was cut and single-layer-locked continuous suturing was started. The suturing pattern was performed by taking bites from outside to inside through the lower lip and inside to outside through the upper lip of the wound. Each time, a lock was formed by passing through the loop formed by the previous suture. The suturing was performed at approximately 1 cm intervals with a 1 cm margin from the wound edges
(Single-Layer Unlocked Continuous Suturing Technique): The uterotomy line was closed in a single-layer continuous suturing pattern that is explained above as group 2 but without passing the needle through the loop formed by the previous sutu
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant women undergoing C/S for the first time
- weeks \< gestation (term pregnancies)
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of regular contractions in the uterus
- Cervical dilatation of more than 4 cm, indicating the onset of the active phase of labour
- Placental abnormalities
- Previous uterine surgery
- Multiple pregnancy
- Premature rupture of membranes
- Chorioamnionitis
- Preoperative haemoglobin level below 10g/dl
- Body mass index (BMI) above 35kg/m2
- Any comorbidity (e.g. diabetes, hypertension, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia)
- Smoking and/or alcohol use
- The need for a blood transfusion.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gazıosmanpasa Unıversity
Tokat Province, 60090, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Neset Gumusburun, M.D.
Gazıosmanpasa Unıversity
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 19, 2024
First Posted
January 7, 2025
Study Start
May 1, 2022
Primary Completion
October 30, 2022
Study Completion
January 30, 2023
Last Updated
January 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- ICF
- Time Frame
- The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from corresponding author.