Studying the Workflow of the American College of Surgeons Geriatric Surgery Program to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Older Adults Undergoing Surgery at the James Cancer Hospital
Implementation of the American College of Surgeons Geriatric Surgery Verification Program at the James Cancer Hospital
2 other identifiers
interventional
4,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study examines how the American College of Surgeons Geriatric Surgery Verification Program, also called the ACS GSV Program, is implemented at the James Cancer Hospital. The program is designed to improve surgical care for adults age 65 and older by helping care teams identify and address age-related needs before, during, and after surgery. Older adults with cancer may have concerns related to physical function, memory or thinking, medications, social support, and goals of care. If these needs are not recognized, patients may be at higher risk for complications, longer hospital stays, readmission, or discharge to a facility instead of home. The ACS GSV Program includes standards for geriatric surgery leadership, goals-of-care discussions, screening for age-related vulnerabilities, care plans for identified needs, age-friendly perioperative care, and regular review of surgical outcomes. This study will evaluate how well these standards are adopted across surgical oncology services and whether implementation is associated with better outcomes, such as shorter hospital stays, fewer complications, fewer readmissions, and improved discharge outcomes. The results may help improve surgical care workflows for older adults undergoing cancer surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 26, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
May 29, 2026
May 1, 2026
1.5 years
May 2, 2026
May 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Adoption of the Core ACS GSV Care Bundle
Patient-level completion of the core ACS GSV care bundle, defined as completed goals-of-care documentation, completed G8 geriatric vulnerability screening, and, among patients with a positive G8 screen, documented referral to the Cancer Aging and Resiliency Clinic or documented rationale for referral deferral. Measured as the percentage of eligible patients who complete the core ACS GSV care bundle. The bundle is defined as completed goals-of-care documentation, completed G8 geriatric vulnerability screening, and, among patients with a positive G8 screen, documented referral to the Cancer Aging and Resiliency Clinic or documented rationale for referral deferral.
From ACS GSV implementation through study completion, up to 3 years.
Hospital Length of Stay
Patient hospital length of stay after surgery, measured in days using electronic health record data.Measured in days from admission to discharge for the index surgical hospitalization using electronic health record data.
From admission for the index surgical hospitalization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days after surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Completion of Goals-of-Care Documentation
From ACS GSV implementation through study completion, up to 3 years.
Completion of G8 Geriatric Vulnerability Screening
From ACS GSV implementation through study completion, up to 3 years.
Implementation Cost
From pre-implementation planning through study completion, up to 3 years.
Referral or Documented Deferral for Positive G8 Screens
From ACS GSV implementation through study completion, up to 3 years.
ACS GSV Fidelity Index Score
From ACS GSV implementation through study completion, up to 3 years.
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Group 1 (months 3-6 ACS GSV)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants complete the Serious Illness Conversation Program (SICP) workshop over two months (months 1-2). Participants then implement the ACS GSV program into surgical services over four months (months 3-6) followed by a transition period over 1 month (month 7) and continued maintenance implementation of the ACS GSV program over 9 months (months 8-16).
Group 2 (months 8-11 ACS GSV)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants complete the SICP workshop over two months (months 6-7). Participants then implement the ACS GSV program into surgical services over four months (months 8-11) followed by a transition period over 1 month (month 12) and continued maintenance implementation of the ACS GSV program over 4 months (months 13-16).
Group 3 (months 13-16 ACS GSV)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants complete the SICP workshop over two months (months 11-12). Participants then implement the ACS GSV program into surgical services over four months (months 13-16).
Interventions
Surgeons and advanced practice providers complete Serious Illness Conversation Program training to support elicitation and documentation of goals of care for older adults undergoing oncologic surgery.
Implementation of the American College of Surgeons Geriatric Surgery Verification Age-Friendly Level standards across surgical oncology services, supported by tailored implementation strategies informed by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior model, Theoretical Domains Framework, and Behavior Change Wheel. Components include goals-of-care documentation workflows, G8 geriatric vulnerability screening, referral pathways for patients with positive screens, age-friendly perioperative care processes, and data surveillance/quality monitoring.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient records for adults aged 65 years or older
- Patient records with a surgical encounter or preoperative evaluation within participating James Cancer Hospital surgical oncology services during the rollout period
- Patient records with data available in institutional electronic health record or institutional data systems
- Clinical staff age 18 years or older who are employed or credentialed at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and work within clinical areas affected by ACS Geriatric Surgery Verification implementation
You may not qualify if:
- Patient records for encounters occurring only at outside institutions or non-James hospitals within the enterprise
- Patient records missing all primary outcome fields after data quality checks
- Clinical staff who are trainees, including medical students, physician assistant students, nursing students, resident physicians, or fellows
- Clinical staff whose employment, visa, or institutional status would make participation sensitive under institutional policy, if applicable
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Samilia Obeng-Gyasi, MD, MPH
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Central Study Contacts
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2026
First Posted
May 26, 2026
Study Start
June 15, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
May 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared because the study uses institutional EHR-derived clinical data, quality dashboard data, implementation data, and staff survey data that are subject to institutional privacy, IRB, and data governance restrictions. Aggregate findings will be reported publicly, and data access requests may be considered through Ohio State's institutional review and data governance processes.