NCT07606287

Brief Summary

This study examines how the American College of Surgeons Geriatric Surgery Verification Program, also called the ACS GSV Program, is implemented at the James Cancer Hospital. The program is designed to improve surgical care for adults age 65 and older by helping care teams identify and address age-related needs before, during, and after surgery. Older adults with cancer may have concerns related to physical function, memory or thinking, medications, social support, and goals of care. If these needs are not recognized, patients may be at higher risk for complications, longer hospital stays, readmission, or discharge to a facility instead of home. The ACS GSV Program includes standards for geriatric surgery leadership, goals-of-care discussions, screening for age-related vulnerabilities, care plans for identified needs, age-friendly perioperative care, and regular review of surgical outcomes. This study will evaluate how well these standards are adopted across surgical oncology services and whether implementation is associated with better outcomes, such as shorter hospital stays, fewer complications, fewer readmissions, and improved discharge outcomes. The results may help improve surgical care workflows for older adults undergoing cancer surgery.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
4,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
19mo left

Started Jun 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 2, 2026

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 26, 2026

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2026

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

May 29, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

May 2, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 27, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

geriatric surgery verificationoncogeriatrics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Adoption of the Core ACS GSV Care Bundle

    Patient-level completion of the core ACS GSV care bundle, defined as completed goals-of-care documentation, completed G8 geriatric vulnerability screening, and, among patients with a positive G8 screen, documented referral to the Cancer Aging and Resiliency Clinic or documented rationale for referral deferral. Measured as the percentage of eligible patients who complete the core ACS GSV care bundle. The bundle is defined as completed goals-of-care documentation, completed G8 geriatric vulnerability screening, and, among patients with a positive G8 screen, documented referral to the Cancer Aging and Resiliency Clinic or documented rationale for referral deferral.

    From ACS GSV implementation through study completion, up to 3 years.

  • Hospital Length of Stay

    Patient hospital length of stay after surgery, measured in days using electronic health record data.Measured in days from admission to discharge for the index surgical hospitalization using electronic health record data.

    From admission for the index surgical hospitalization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days after surgery.

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Completion of Goals-of-Care Documentation

    From ACS GSV implementation through study completion, up to 3 years.

  • Completion of G8 Geriatric Vulnerability Screening

    From ACS GSV implementation through study completion, up to 3 years.

  • Implementation Cost

    From pre-implementation planning through study completion, up to 3 years.

  • Referral or Documented Deferral for Positive G8 Screens

    From ACS GSV implementation through study completion, up to 3 years.

  • ACS GSV Fidelity Index Score

    From ACS GSV implementation through study completion, up to 3 years.

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Group 1 (months 3-6 ACS GSV)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants complete the Serious Illness Conversation Program (SICP) workshop over two months (months 1-2). Participants then implement the ACS GSV program into surgical services over four months (months 3-6) followed by a transition period over 1 month (month 7) and continued maintenance implementation of the ACS GSV program over 9 months (months 8-16).

Behavioral: Serious Illness Conversation Program trainingOther: ACS Geriatric Surgery Verification Program Implementation

Group 2 (months 8-11 ACS GSV)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants complete the SICP workshop over two months (months 6-7). Participants then implement the ACS GSV program into surgical services over four months (months 8-11) followed by a transition period over 1 month (month 12) and continued maintenance implementation of the ACS GSV program over 4 months (months 13-16).

Behavioral: Serious Illness Conversation Program trainingOther: ACS Geriatric Surgery Verification Program Implementation

Group 3 (months 13-16 ACS GSV)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants complete the SICP workshop over two months (months 11-12). Participants then implement the ACS GSV program into surgical services over four months (months 13-16).

Behavioral: Serious Illness Conversation Program trainingOther: ACS Geriatric Surgery Verification Program Implementation

Interventions

Surgeons and advanced practice providers complete Serious Illness Conversation Program training to support elicitation and documentation of goals of care for older adults undergoing oncologic surgery.

Group 1 (months 3-6 ACS GSV)Group 2 (months 8-11 ACS GSV)Group 3 (months 13-16 ACS GSV)

Implementation of the American College of Surgeons Geriatric Surgery Verification Age-Friendly Level standards across surgical oncology services, supported by tailored implementation strategies informed by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior model, Theoretical Domains Framework, and Behavior Change Wheel. Components include goals-of-care documentation workflows, G8 geriatric vulnerability screening, referral pathways for patients with positive screens, age-friendly perioperative care processes, and data surveillance/quality monitoring.

Also known as: GSV implementation
Group 1 (months 3-6 ACS GSV)Group 2 (months 8-11 ACS GSV)Group 3 (months 13-16 ACS GSV)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient records for adults aged 65 years or older
  • Patient records with a surgical encounter or preoperative evaluation within participating James Cancer Hospital surgical oncology services during the rollout period
  • Patient records with data available in institutional electronic health record or institutional data systems
  • Clinical staff age 18 years or older who are employed or credentialed at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and work within clinical areas affected by ACS Geriatric Surgery Verification implementation

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient records for encounters occurring only at outside institutions or non-James hospitals within the enterprise
  • Patient records missing all primary outcome fields after data quality checks
  • Clinical staff who are trainees, including medical students, physician assistant students, nursing students, resident physicians, or fellows
  • Clinical staff whose employment, visa, or institutional status would make participation sensitive under institutional policy, if applicable

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsHead and Neck NeoplasmsSkin NeoplasmsSoft Tissue NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsEndocrine Gland Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesDigestive System NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesNervous System NeoplasmsNervous System DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Samilia Obeng-Gyasi, MD, MPH

    Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Stepped-wedge cluster randomized implementation study. Twelve surgical oncology services are randomized into three rollout groups. Groups cross over from usual care/pre-implementation to ACS GSV implementation at prespecified time periods until all services receive the intervention.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2026

First Posted

May 26, 2026

Study Start

June 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

May 29, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared because the study uses institutional EHR-derived clinical data, quality dashboard data, implementation data, and staff survey data that are subject to institutional privacy, IRB, and data governance restrictions. Aggregate findings will be reported publicly, and data access requests may be considered through Ohio State's institutional review and data governance processes.

Locations