NCT07605897

Brief Summary

The main purpose of this research study is to learn if an alternative bowel preparation (bowel prep) for colonoscopy is safe, tolerable and effective as compared to the standard bowel prep. Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of the following bowel cleansing regimens for colonoscopy.

  • Standard Bowel Prep which includes a clear liquid diet the day before the scheduled procedure and two doses of a laxative, polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG-3350) taken with 4 liters of water.
  • Happy Colon Foods Bowel Prep which begins the day before the scheduled procedure and contains various low residue foods (foods that are easily digested and absorbed), and seven doses of laxatives including PEG-3350 taken with a total of about 4 liters of water, senna tablets, and one dose of magnesium citrate.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
57

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2022

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2022

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 24, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 24, 2025

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 11, 2026

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 26, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 26, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

May 11, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 18, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

colonoscopybowel preparation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient acceptance/satisfaction

    Measure: Scores on a designed survey evaluating acceptance, ease of following instructions and willingness to repeat the preparation.

    Periprocedural

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Quality of bowel preparation

    During colonoscopy (single procedure)

  • Patient-reported symptoms during bowel preparation

    Periprocedural

  • Adverse events during bowel preparation

    Periprocedural

Other Outcomes (8)

  • Irrigation and suction time

    Periprocedural

  • Colonoscopy withdrawal time

    Periprocedural

  • Total colonoscopy procedure time

    Periprocedural

  • +5 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Experimental: Food Kit with Laxatives (Happy Colon Foods)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receive a commercially available prepackaged food and laxative kit (Happy Colon Foods) starting 24 hours before colonoscopy, including a low-residue diet and intermittent laxative regimen with PEG-3350 powder, senna tablets, and a single dose of magnesium citrate, following written and visual instructions.

Other: Use of a standardized meal content (food-kit) the day prior to colonoscopy

Control: Standard GoLYTELY Split-Dose Prep

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients receive standard colonoscopy bowel preparation using a clear liquid diet for 24 hours before the procedure and split-dose 4 L polyethylene glycol 3350 electrolyte solution (PEG-3350; GoLYTELY) prior to the scheduled colonoscopy.

Drug: Polyethylene glycol 3350 - electrolyte solution (GoLYTELY)

Interventions

Low-residue diet food items and scheduled doses of PEG-3350, senna, and magnesium citrate prior to the colonoscopy

Experimental: Food Kit with Laxatives (Happy Colon Foods)

Split-dose 4 L PEG-3350 electrolyte lavage solution taken the day before and morning of colonoscopy, combined with 24-hour clear liquid diet.

Control: Standard GoLYTELY Split-Dose Prep

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 69 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- Veterans undergoing index colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening, including follow-up colonoscopy after a positive non-invasive stool-based test (e.g., fecal immunochemical test)

You may not qualify if:

  • Personal history of colorectal cancer
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Prior colon resection
  • Antithrombotic therapy precluding polypectomy
  • Pregnancy
  • Hospitalization at the time of the scheduled procedure
  • Celiac disease (food kit contained gluten products)
  • Prior colonoscopy (cognitive bias)
  • Chronic kidney disease stage 3 or higher
  • Age 70 years or older.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Central Virginia VA Health Care System

Richmond, Virginia, 23249, United States

Location

Related Publications (23)

  • Lahti H, Lyyra N, Hietajarvi L, Villberg J, Paakkari L. Profiles of Internet Use and Health in Adolescence: A Person-Oriented Approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 29;18(13):6972. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136972.

    PMID: 34209886BACKGROUND
  • Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Baute JL, Hernandez G, Morales D, Gonzalez-Perez CD, Nicolas-Perez D, Alarcon-Fernandez O, Jimenez A, Hernandez-Guerra M, Romero R, Alonso I, Gonzalez Y, Adrian Z, Carrillo M, Ramos L, Quintero E. Risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation: a validated predictive score. Endoscopy. 2017 Jun;49(6):536-543. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101683. Epub 2017 Mar 10.

    PMID: 28282690BACKGROUND
  • Tyson SF, Burton L, McGovern A. The impact of a toolkit on use of standardised measurement tools in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Sep;29(9):926-34. doi: 10.1177/0269215514562590. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

    PMID: 25501626BACKGROUND
  • Hafeez M, Yuan C, Shahzad K, Aziz B, Iqbal K, Raza S. An empirical evaluation of financial development-carbon footprint nexus in One Belt and Road region. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Aug;26(24):25026-25036. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05757-z. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

    PMID: 31250390BACKGROUND
  • Othman F, Crooks CJ, Card TR. The risk of Clostridium difficile infection in patients with pernicious anaemia: a retrospective cohort study using primary care database. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Nov;5(7):959-966. doi: 10.1177/2050640617695697. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

    PMID: 29163961BACKGROUND
  • Chak A, Cooper GS, Canto MI, Pollack BJ, Sivak MV Jr. Enteroscopy for the initial evaluation of iron deficiency. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Feb;47(2):144-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70347-5.

    PMID: 9512279BACKGROUND
  • Vetter B, Gasch B, Padosch SA. [Coping with complex medical emergency situations : Competent and successful decision-making, communication and leadership]. Anaesthesist. 2015 Apr;64(4):298-303. doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-2423-2. German.

    PMID: 25701067BACKGROUND
  • Smith MM, Hayes AJ, Melrose J. Pentosan Polysulfate, a Semisynthetic Heparinoid Disease-Modifying Osteoarthritic Drug with Roles in Intervertebral Disc Repair Biology Emulating the Stem Cell Instructive and Tissue Reparative Properties of Heparan Sulfate. Stem Cells Dev. 2022 Aug;31(15-16):406-430. doi: 10.1089/scd.2022.0007. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

    PMID: 35102748BACKGROUND
  • Hu S, Gong T, Ma J, Tao Y, Xian Q. Simultaneous determination of iodinated haloacetic acids and aromatic iodinated disinfection byproducts in waters with a new SPE-HPLC-MS/MS method. Chemosphere. 2018 May;198:147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.124. Epub 2018 Feb 3.

    PMID: 29421724BACKGROUND
  • Rotolo F, Vitiello V, Pellegrini D, Carotenuto Y, Buttino I. Historical control data in ecotoxicology: Eight years of tests with the copepod Acartia tonsa. Environ Pollut. 2021 Sep 1;284:117468. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117468. Epub 2021 May 27.

    PMID: 34062440BACKGROUND
  • Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057. Epub 2009 Jan 10.

    PMID: 19136102BACKGROUND
  • Raulf-Heimsoth M, Rihs HP, Rozynek P, Cremer R, Gaspar A, Pires G, Yeang HY, Arif SA, Hamilton RG, Sander I, Lundberg M, Bruning T. Quantitative analysis of immunoglobulin E reactivity profiles in patients allergic or sensitized to natural rubber latex (Hevea brasiliensis). Clin Exp Allergy. 2007 Nov;37(11):1657-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02833.x. Epub 2007 Sep 19.

    PMID: 17883426BACKGROUND
  • Robertson GS, Ristic CD, Bullen BR. The incidence of congenitally absent foot pulses. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990 Mar;72(2):99-100.

    PMID: 2185683BACKGROUND
  • Kahl S, Zimmermann S, Genz I, Glasbrenner B, Pross M, Schulz HU, Mc Namara D, Schmidt U, Malfertheiner P. Risk factors for failure of endoscopic stenting of biliary strictures in chronic pancreatitis: a prospective follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Nov;98(11):2448-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.08667.x.

    PMID: 14638347BACKGROUND
  • Parsons TM, Satchithananda K, Berbe R, Siddiqui IA, Robinson E, Hart AJ. [MRI investigations in patients with problems due to metal-on-metal implants]. Orthopade. 2013 Aug;42(8):629-36. doi: 10.1007/s00132-012-2036-2. German.

    PMID: 23912305BACKGROUND
  • Riemann JF. Colorectal cancer screening in Europe: compliance and the choice of test. Endoscopy. 2010 Jul;42(7):576-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255542. Epub 2010 Jun 30. No abstract available.

    PMID: 20593335BACKGROUND
  • Klein EY. Antimalarial drug resistance: a review of the biology and strategies to delay emergence and spread. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013 Apr;41(4):311-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.12.007. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

    PMID: 23394809BACKGROUND
  • Chave SP. The Duncan memorial lecture. 'Duncan of Liverpool--and some lessons for today'. Community Med. 1984 Feb;6(1):61-71. No abstract available.

    PMID: 6368115BACKGROUND
  • Scaglione G, Pietrini L, Russo F, Franco MR, Sorrentini I. Long-acting octreotide as rescue therapy in chronic bleeding from gastrointestinal angiodysplasia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Sep 15;26(6):935-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03435.x.

    PMID: 17767478BACKGROUND
  • See CC, Newman LJ, Berezin S, Glassman MS, Medow MS, Dozor AJ, Schwarz SM. Gastroesophageal reflux-induced hypoxemia in infants with apparent life-threatening event(s). Am J Dis Child. 1989 Aug;143(8):951-4.

    PMID: 2756970BACKGROUND
  • Kluge MA, Williams JL, Wu CK, Jacobson BC, Schroy PC 3rd, Lieberman DA, Calderwood AH. Inadequate Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores predict the risk of missed neoplasia on the next colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):744-751. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

    PMID: 28648575BACKGROUND
  • Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M, Rosenbaum AJ, Wang T, Neugut AI. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun;73(6):1207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.051. Epub 2011 Apr 8.

    PMID: 21481857BACKGROUND
  • Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Kaltenbach T, Levin TR, Lieberman D, Robertson DJ. Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;112(7):1016-1030. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.174. Epub 2017 Jun 6.

    PMID: 28555630BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Golytely

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
single-blinded endoscopist
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Feasibility study comparing low-fiber vs clear-liquid diet before colonoscopy
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Staff Physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2026

First Posted

May 26, 2026

Study Start

November 1, 2022

Primary Completion

June 24, 2025

Study Completion

June 24, 2025

Last Updated

May 26, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data from this single-center VA study will not be shared outside the institution due to privacy and confidentiality protections for Veterans and lack of an approved external data-sharing mechanism. Aggregate results will be disseminated through presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

Locations