Impact of Chewing Gum on Bowel Preparation in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths that could be prevented in the United States. Colonoscopy is the best test for finding and removing polyps before they turn into cancer. However, many people are hesitant to have a colonoscopy because of the bowel preparation. The preparation can be difficult to tolerate, with patients often struggling to finish it due to the taste, volume, or side effects like nausea and bloating. This can lead to incomplete procedures or discourage people from getting screened at all. Chewing sugar-free gum is a simple, low-cost, and safe intervention that may make the preparation process easier. One study from China found that chewing gum did not change the quality of bowel cleansing, but patients reported that they were more satisfied with the process. No U.S.-based studies have tested this strategy, and no prior research has looked at whether gum chewing has different effects in people using high-volume versus low-volume prep solutions. The investigators will randomize 160 participants to the stated intervention or control using computer-generated 1:1 randomization. Upon completing the study, the investigators will analyze the data. By studying gum chewing during bowel preparation, the investigators hope to find out whether this small change can make bowel prep more tolerable and encourage more patients to complete their colonoscopy. If successful, this approach could help more people get screened, leading to earlier detection and prevention of colorectal cancer in the community.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 6, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 21, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2026
April 17, 2026
April 1, 2026
10 months
December 8, 2025
April 13, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bowel cleansing quality (BBPS total score)
Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (0-9; sum of right, transverse, left colon segment scores) assessed by the blinded endoscopist. Higher scores indicate better cleansing.
Day of colonoscopy (intra-procedure assessment, immediately prior to withdrawal).
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Patient tolerance
Day of colonoscopy (pre-procedure)
Patient satisfaction
Day of colonoscopy (pre-procedure)
Prep completion rate
Day of colonoscopy (pre-procedure)
Willingness to repeat
Day of colonoscopy (pre-procedure)
Segmental Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BPPS) Scores
Day of colonoscopy (intra-procedure)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Chewing Gum During Bowel Preparation (2L PEG-ELP)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to the experimental arm will chew one piece of sugar-free gum for approximately 15-20 minutes, 30 minutes before starting the first dose of split-dose bowel preparation and again 30 minutes after the second dose. The gum is sugar-free and non-medicated. Participants will be instructed not to swallow the gum and to discontinue chewing if they experience discomfort. All participants will receive standard bowel preparation (either 4L PEG or 2L PEG + ascorbate, prescribed according to clinical indication). The endoscopist performing the colonoscopy will remain blinded to group assignment.
Standard Bowel Preparation 4L (No Gum)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in the control arm will undergo standard split-dose bowel preparation (4L PEG) according to clinical indication, without chewing gum before or after the preparation. Endoscopists will be blinded to participant group assignment.
Chewing Gum During 4L Bowel Preparation
EXPERIMENTALArm Description: Participants randomized to the experimental arm will chew one piece of sugar-free gum for approximately 15-20 minutes, 30 minutes before starting the first dose of split-dose bowel preparation and again 30 minutes after the second dose. The gum is sugar-free and non-medicated. Participants will be instructed not to swallow the gum and to discontinue chewing if they experience discomfort. All participants will receive standard bowel preparation (either 4L PEG or 2L PEG + ascorbate, prescribed according to clinical indication). The endoscopist performing the colonoscopy will remain blinded to group assignment.
Standard Bowel Preparation 2L PEG-ELP (No Gum)
ACTIVE COMPARATORArm Description: Participants in the control arm will undergo standard split-dose bowel preparation (2L PEG + ascorbate) according to clinical indication, without chewing gum before or after the preparation. Endoscopists will be blinded to participant group assignment.
Interventions
Participants in this comparator arm will follow standard split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) bowel preparation (4L PEG, prescribed per clinical indication) without gum chewing before or after the preparation. This represents the standard-of-care approach currently used for colonoscopy preparation at the study site.
Participants randomized to the intervention arm will chew one piece of sugar-free gum for approximately 15-20 minutes, 30 minutes before the first dose of split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) bowel preparation and again 30 minutes after completing the second dose. The gum-chewing activity is intended to improve tolerance and satisfaction with the bowel preparation process through cephalic-vagal stimulation ("sham feeding") without altering the underlying cleansing regimen.
Participants in this comparator arm will follow standard split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) bowel preparation (either 4L PEG or 2L PEG + ascorbate, prescribed per clinical indication) without gum chewing before or after the preparation. This represents the standard-of-care approach currently used for colonoscopy preparation at the study site.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 45-75 years
- Scheduled for elective outpatient colonoscopy
- Able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Prior major abdominal surgery (excluding appendectomy or cholecystectomy)
- Pregnancy
- Cognitive impairment
- Ward of the state
- Known allergy to PEG or gum components
- Current use of GI prokinetics
- Known temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorder or difficulty chewing/swallowing
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UMMC Midtown - Outpatient Endoscopy Center
Towson, Maryland, 21204, United States
Related Publications (5)
Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, Dominitz JA, Kaltenbach T, Martel M, Robertson DJ, Boland CR, Giardello FM, Lieberman DA, Levin TR, Rex DK. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the U.S. multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Oct;80(4):543-562. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.08.002. No abstract available.
PMID: 25220509RESULTGao C, Zou D, Wang W, Li Y, Han J, Su D, Qi X. Effect of chewing gum combined with WeChat-enhanced instruction on bowel preparation in constipated patients: a randomized-controlled trial. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2025 Apr 28;13:goaf034. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goaf034. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 40297539RESULTGuo T, et al. Chewing gum improves tolerance but not quality of bowel preparation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024;16(6):321-333.
RESULTAtalay R, et al. Gum chewing improves bowel preparation quality for colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019;30(9):801-807.
RESULTZhang S, et al. Effect of chewing gum on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62(7):874-881.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Gastroenterology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 8, 2025
First Posted
January 6, 2026
Study Start
February 21, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Last Updated
April 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Given the small, single-center RCT focused on workflow-embedded outcomes and minimal-risk behavioral exposure, the investigators do not plan to share de-identified IPD outside the study team. Aggregate results will be disseminated via presentations and peer-reviewed publication.