NCT07605754

Brief Summary

Rationale: Postamputation pain (PAP) is frequently seen after amputations and is a severe lifelong disabling condition affecting quality of life (QoL). Different nerve surgical techniques are available to treat PAP if non-surgical treatment options are not sufficient. Multiple techniques have been described for treatment of symptomatic neuromas with varying results. Techniques described include traction neurectomy with/without implantation, nerve grafting, nerve capping, regenerative peripheral nerve interface, and targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR). In the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), the most common techniques to treat painful neuromas include TMR and fascicular split (FS). TMR involves coaptating the transected mixed nerve to functional motor nerves, showing promising results in recent studies. FS is a technique closely related to neurectomy with implantation in a functional muscle. The difference is that with FS, the nerve is split into fascicles before implantation to allow for better distribution of nerve fibers. These techniques have not yet been compared. In this study, the investigators will compare both these techniques in a prospective setting for the treatment of PAP. The hypothesis is, that after 12 months, pain will be diminished and QoL will be increased in all patients versus the pre-operative status. There will be little to no difference in outcome between the surgical techniques used. Objective: To evaluate limb pain in patients with intractable postamputation pain (residual limb pain and phantom limb pain) one year after nerve embedding surgery following the standardized workup of the LUMC. Study design: Prospective study Study population: Patients 18 years of age or older, with a history of more than 6 months of intractable postamputation neuropathic limb pain, with no history of previous surgical intervention for pain treatment, referred to the Leiden Nerve Center. Main study parameters/endpoints: The mean difference in pain scores for phantom limb pain and residual limb pain one year postoperatively. An average pain score from the past 7 days is used for PLP and RLP individually, on the 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale (NRS). Additionally, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Behavior and Interference Questionnaire Short Forms (7a and 8a, respectively) are used one year postoperatively. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit, and group relatedness: Both techniques are currently used in the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) and considered standard of care. The decision to perform either technique is solely dependent on the personal preference of the treating nerve surgeon. The results of this trial will improve the understanding of the treatment effect of both surgical techniques with a minimal patient burden. Participation requires patients to complete 3-4 non-invasive questionnaires about pain, quality of life, depression and anxiety, and mobility over a period of 2 years. The pre-operative (if applicable) and 12-month postoperative questionnaire will each take approximately 15 minutes to complete. The other two questionnaires at 18 and 24 months postoperative will take approximately 3-4 minutes to complete. Additionally, participants will fill out a daily questionnaire consisting of one to three questions about pain for 7 consecutive days at 12 months.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
98

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
39mo left

Started Aug 2025

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress21%
Aug 2025Aug 2029

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 14, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 15, 2025

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 26, 2026

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 20, 2028

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 20, 2029

Last Updated

May 26, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

September 15, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 18, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

NeuromaAmputationpainTargeted Muscle ReinnervationNerve embedding

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Phantom limb pain measured on the 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale.

    A primary endpoint is the mean phantom limb pain experience one year postoperatively. This will be measured on the 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale over 7 consecutive days. A higher score indicates worse pain.

    1 year postoperatively

  • Residual limb pain measured on the 11-point numeric rating scale

    A primary endpoint is the mean residual limb pain experience one year postoperatively. This will be measured on the 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale over 7 consecutive days. A higher score indicates worse pain.

    1 year postoperatively

  • PROMIS pain behavior short form 7a

    PROMIS pain behavior short form 7a in Dutch-Flemish

    1 year postoperatively

  • PROMIS pain interference short form 8a

    PROMIS pain interference short form 8a in Dutch-Flemish

    1 year postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Phantom limb pain using the 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale

    From enrolment until 24 months post-operatively

  • Residual limb pain using the 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale

    From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively

  • PROMIS pain behavior 7a short form in Dutch-Flemish

    From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively

  • PROMIS pain interference 8a short form in Dutch-Flemish

    From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively

  • Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)

    From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control: Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR)

Patients with a symptomatic neuroma requiring surgical intervention

Procedure: Targeted Muscle Reinnervation

Intervention: Fascicular split

Patients with a symptomatic neuroma requiring surgical intervention

Procedure: Fascicular split

Interventions

Fasicular split surgical technique: 1. Painful nerve is identified and the neuroma is resected. 2. Split the nerve into its constituent multiple nerve fascicles 3. Create a deep muscle pocket for each individual fascicle 4. Plant each fascicle into a separate muscle compartment and fixate the fascicle in place with tissue glue.

Also known as: nerve embedding
Intervention: Fascicular split

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation surgical technique 1. Painful nerve is identified and the neuroma is resected. 2. A nerve stimulator is used to identify functional motor nerve branches. Near the point where the motor branch enters the muscle, the motor nerve branch is transected 3. End-to-end nerve coaptation is performed between the amputated nerve and the transected motor nerve branch.

Control: Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with intractable postamputation pain after a major extremity amputation (trans humeral, elbow disarticulation, forearm, transfemoral, knee disarticulation, and transtibial) undergoing surgical postamputation pain treatment in our center.

You may qualify if:

  • Age older than or equal to 18 years
  • Intractable postamputation pain

You may not qualify if:

  • Having received previous radiotherapy on the affected limb
  • Patients who are unable to comprehend the informed consent form or the questionnaires used in the current study
  • Unfit for general anesthesia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Leiden University Medical Center

Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA, Netherlands

RECRUITING

Related Publications (20)

  • AnnĂ© C, de Laat FA, Hafner BJ, et al. "Dutch-Flemish translation of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M)". Poster tijdens het PROMIS congres Praag. 2022.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hudak PL, Wright JG. The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3167-77. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00012.

    PMID: 11124733BACKGROUND
  • Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.

    PMID: 6880820BACKGROUND
  • Freynhagen R, Baron R, Gockel U, Tolle TR. painDETECT: a new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Oct;22(10):1911-20. doi: 10.1185/030079906X132488.

    PMID: 17022849BACKGROUND
  • Gomez-Eslava B, Raasveld FV, Hoftiezer YAJ, McCarty JC, Daddario JL, Valerio IL, Heng M, Eberlin KR. Pain Sketches to Predict Pain following Primary Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in Amputees. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 May 1;153(5):1162-1171. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010762. Epub 2023 May 26.

    PMID: 37252909BACKGROUND
  • Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

    PMID: 21479777BACKGROUND
  • Harden RN, Weinland SR, Remble TA, Houle TT, Colio S, Steedman S, Kee WG; American Pain Society Physicians. Medication Quantification Scale Version III: update in medication classes and revised detriment weights by survey of American Pain Society Physicians. J Pain. 2005 Jun;6(6):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.01.350.

    PMID: 15943958BACKGROUND
  • Terwee CB, Roorda LD, de Vet HC, Dekker J, Westhovens R, van Leeuwen J, Cella D, Correia H, Arnold B, Perez B, Boers M. Dutch-Flemish translation of 17 item banks from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Qual Life Res. 2014 Aug;23(6):1733-41. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0611-6. Epub 2014 Jan 9.

    PMID: 24402179BACKGROUND
  • Schafer B, Freund G, Orr J, Nolte K, Weis J, Bahm J, Beier JP. Technique and Expected Benefit of Intraoperative Perfusion Imaging of Peripheral Nerves. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Nov 5;12(11):e6281. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006281. eCollection 2024 Nov.

    PMID: 39507316BACKGROUND
  • O'Brien AL, Jordan SW, West JM, Mioton LM, Dumanian GA, Valerio IL. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Upper-Extremity Amputation for the Treatment of Pain Severity and Symptoms. J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Jan;46(1):72.e1-72.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

    PMID: 33268236BACKGROUND
  • Berger LE, Shin S, Haffner ZK, Huffman SS, Spoer DL, Sayyed AA, Franzoni G, Bekeny JC, Attinger CE, Kleiber GM. The application of targeted muscle reinnervation in lower extremity amputations: A systematic review. Microsurgery. 2023 Oct;43(7):736-747. doi: 10.1002/micr.31030. Epub 2023 Mar 2.

    PMID: 36864779BACKGROUND
  • Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.

    PMID: 11690728BACKGROUND
  • Kang NV, Woollard A, Michno DA, Al-Ajam Y, Tan J, Hansen E. A consecutive series of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) cases for relief of neuroma and phantom limb pain: UK perspective. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):960-969. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.068. Epub 2021 Oct 22.

    PMID: 34840118BACKGROUND
  • Mioton LM, Dumanian GA, Shah N, Qiu CS, Ertl WJ, Potter BK, Souza JM, Valerio IL, Ko JH, Jordan SW. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Improves Residual Limb Pain, Phantom Limb Pain, and Limb Function: A Prospective Study of 33 Major Limb Amputees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2161-2167. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001323.

    PMID: 32452928BACKGROUND
  • Dumanian GA, Potter BK, Mioton LM, Ko JH, Cheesborough JE, Souza JM, Ertl WJ, Tintle SM, Nanos GP, Valerio IL, Kuiken TA, Apkarian AV, Porter K, Jordan SW. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Treats Neuroma and Phantom Pain in Major Limb Amputees: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):238-246. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003088.

    PMID: 30371518BACKGROUND
  • Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE. Treatment of the painful neuroma by neuroma resection and muscle implantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Mar;77(3):427-38. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198603000-00016.

    PMID: 2937074BACKGROUND
  • Ives GC, Kung TA, Nghiem BT, Ursu DC, Brown DL, Cederna PS, Kemp SWP. Current State of the Surgical Treatment of Terminal Neuromas. Neurosurgery. 2018 Sep 1;83(3):354-364. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx500.

    PMID: 29053875BACKGROUND
  • Poyntz SA, Hacking NM, Dalal M, Fowler S. Peripheral Interventions for Painful Stump Neuromas of the Lower Limb: A Systematic Review. Clin J Pain. 2018 Mar;34(3):285-295. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000533.

    PMID: 28678059BACKGROUND
  • Nederlandse Vereniging van Revalidatieartsen. Amputatie en prothesiologie onderste extremiteit. Available from: https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/richtlijn/amputatie_prothesiologie_onderste_extremiteit/startpagina_-_amputatie_en_prothesiologie_onderste_extremiteit.html.

    BACKGROUND
  • Schwingler PM, Moman RN, Hunt C, Ashmore Z, Ogletree SP, Uvodich ME, Murad MH, Hooten WM. Prevalence of postamputation pain and its subtypes: a meta-analysis with meta-regression. Pain Rep. 2021 May 4;6(1):e918. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000918. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 33981935BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NeuromaPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Nerve Sheath NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Nerve TissueNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Justus L. Groen, MD, PhD

    Leiden University Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Guus A.H. Tendijck, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2025

First Posted

May 26, 2026

Study Start

August 14, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 20, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 20, 2029

Last Updated

May 26, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Locations