Results of Nerve Surgery to Treat PostAmputation Pain
TreatPAP
1 other identifier
observational
98
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale: Postamputation pain (PAP) is frequently seen after amputations and is a severe lifelong disabling condition affecting quality of life (QoL). Different nerve surgical techniques are available to treat PAP if non-surgical treatment options are not sufficient. Multiple techniques have been described for treatment of symptomatic neuromas with varying results. Techniques described include traction neurectomy with/without implantation, nerve grafting, nerve capping, regenerative peripheral nerve interface, and targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR). In the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), the most common techniques to treat painful neuromas include TMR and fascicular split (FS). TMR involves coaptating the transected mixed nerve to functional motor nerves, showing promising results in recent studies. FS is a technique closely related to neurectomy with implantation in a functional muscle. The difference is that with FS, the nerve is split into fascicles before implantation to allow for better distribution of nerve fibers. These techniques have not yet been compared. In this study, the investigators will compare both these techniques in a prospective setting for the treatment of PAP. The hypothesis is, that after 12 months, pain will be diminished and QoL will be increased in all patients versus the pre-operative status. There will be little to no difference in outcome between the surgical techniques used. Objective: To evaluate limb pain in patients with intractable postamputation pain (residual limb pain and phantom limb pain) one year after nerve embedding surgery following the standardized workup of the LUMC. Study design: Prospective study Study population: Patients 18 years of age or older, with a history of more than 6 months of intractable postamputation neuropathic limb pain, with no history of previous surgical intervention for pain treatment, referred to the Leiden Nerve Center. Main study parameters/endpoints: The mean difference in pain scores for phantom limb pain and residual limb pain one year postoperatively. An average pain score from the past 7 days is used for PLP and RLP individually, on the 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale (NRS). Additionally, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Behavior and Interference Questionnaire Short Forms (7a and 8a, respectively) are used one year postoperatively. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit, and group relatedness: Both techniques are currently used in the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) and considered standard of care. The decision to perform either technique is solely dependent on the personal preference of the treating nerve surgeon. The results of this trial will improve the understanding of the treatment effect of both surgical techniques with a minimal patient burden. Participation requires patients to complete 3-4 non-invasive questionnaires about pain, quality of life, depression and anxiety, and mobility over a period of 2 years. The pre-operative (if applicable) and 12-month postoperative questionnaire will each take approximately 15 minutes to complete. The other two questionnaires at 18 and 24 months postoperative will take approximately 3-4 minutes to complete. Additionally, participants will fill out a daily questionnaire consisting of one to three questions about pain for 7 consecutive days at 12 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Aug 2025
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 26, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 20, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 20, 2029
May 26, 2026
May 1, 2026
3 years
September 15, 2025
May 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Phantom limb pain measured on the 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale.
A primary endpoint is the mean phantom limb pain experience one year postoperatively. This will be measured on the 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale over 7 consecutive days. A higher score indicates worse pain.
1 year postoperatively
Residual limb pain measured on the 11-point numeric rating scale
A primary endpoint is the mean residual limb pain experience one year postoperatively. This will be measured on the 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale over 7 consecutive days. A higher score indicates worse pain.
1 year postoperatively
PROMIS pain behavior short form 7a
PROMIS pain behavior short form 7a in Dutch-Flemish
1 year postoperatively
PROMIS pain interference short form 8a
PROMIS pain interference short form 8a in Dutch-Flemish
1 year postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Phantom limb pain using the 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale
From enrolment until 24 months post-operatively
Residual limb pain using the 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale
From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively
PROMIS pain behavior 7a short form in Dutch-Flemish
From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively
PROMIS pain interference 8a short form in Dutch-Flemish
From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively
Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control: Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR)
Patients with a symptomatic neuroma requiring surgical intervention
Intervention: Fascicular split
Patients with a symptomatic neuroma requiring surgical intervention
Interventions
Fasicular split surgical technique: 1. Painful nerve is identified and the neuroma is resected. 2. Split the nerve into its constituent multiple nerve fascicles 3. Create a deep muscle pocket for each individual fascicle 4. Plant each fascicle into a separate muscle compartment and fixate the fascicle in place with tissue glue.
Targeted Muscle Reinnervation surgical technique 1. Painful nerve is identified and the neuroma is resected. 2. A nerve stimulator is used to identify functional motor nerve branches. Near the point where the motor branch enters the muscle, the motor nerve branch is transected 3. End-to-end nerve coaptation is performed between the amputated nerve and the transected motor nerve branch.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with intractable postamputation pain after a major extremity amputation (trans humeral, elbow disarticulation, forearm, transfemoral, knee disarticulation, and transtibial) undergoing surgical postamputation pain treatment in our center.
You may qualify if:
- Age older than or equal to 18 years
- Intractable postamputation pain
You may not qualify if:
- Having received previous radiotherapy on the affected limb
- Patients who are unable to comprehend the informed consent form or the questionnaires used in the current study
- Unfit for general anesthesia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA, Netherlands
Related Publications (20)
Anné C, de Laat FA, Hafner BJ, et al. "Dutch-Flemish translation of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M)". Poster tijdens het PROMIS congres Praag. 2022.
BACKGROUNDHudak PL, Wright JG. The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3167-77. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00012.
PMID: 11124733BACKGROUNDZigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
PMID: 6880820BACKGROUNDFreynhagen R, Baron R, Gockel U, Tolle TR. painDETECT: a new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Oct;22(10):1911-20. doi: 10.1185/030079906X132488.
PMID: 17022849BACKGROUNDGomez-Eslava B, Raasveld FV, Hoftiezer YAJ, McCarty JC, Daddario JL, Valerio IL, Heng M, Eberlin KR. Pain Sketches to Predict Pain following Primary Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in Amputees. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 May 1;153(5):1162-1171. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010762. Epub 2023 May 26.
PMID: 37252909BACKGROUNDHerdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
PMID: 21479777BACKGROUNDHarden RN, Weinland SR, Remble TA, Houle TT, Colio S, Steedman S, Kee WG; American Pain Society Physicians. Medication Quantification Scale Version III: update in medication classes and revised detriment weights by survey of American Pain Society Physicians. J Pain. 2005 Jun;6(6):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.01.350.
PMID: 15943958BACKGROUNDTerwee CB, Roorda LD, de Vet HC, Dekker J, Westhovens R, van Leeuwen J, Cella D, Correia H, Arnold B, Perez B, Boers M. Dutch-Flemish translation of 17 item banks from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Qual Life Res. 2014 Aug;23(6):1733-41. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0611-6. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
PMID: 24402179BACKGROUNDSchafer B, Freund G, Orr J, Nolte K, Weis J, Bahm J, Beier JP. Technique and Expected Benefit of Intraoperative Perfusion Imaging of Peripheral Nerves. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Nov 5;12(11):e6281. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006281. eCollection 2024 Nov.
PMID: 39507316BACKGROUNDO'Brien AL, Jordan SW, West JM, Mioton LM, Dumanian GA, Valerio IL. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Upper-Extremity Amputation for the Treatment of Pain Severity and Symptoms. J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Jan;46(1):72.e1-72.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
PMID: 33268236BACKGROUNDBerger LE, Shin S, Haffner ZK, Huffman SS, Spoer DL, Sayyed AA, Franzoni G, Bekeny JC, Attinger CE, Kleiber GM. The application of targeted muscle reinnervation in lower extremity amputations: A systematic review. Microsurgery. 2023 Oct;43(7):736-747. doi: 10.1002/micr.31030. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
PMID: 36864779BACKGROUNDFarrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.
PMID: 11690728BACKGROUNDKang NV, Woollard A, Michno DA, Al-Ajam Y, Tan J, Hansen E. A consecutive series of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) cases for relief of neuroma and phantom limb pain: UK perspective. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):960-969. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.068. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
PMID: 34840118BACKGROUNDMioton LM, Dumanian GA, Shah N, Qiu CS, Ertl WJ, Potter BK, Souza JM, Valerio IL, Ko JH, Jordan SW. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Improves Residual Limb Pain, Phantom Limb Pain, and Limb Function: A Prospective Study of 33 Major Limb Amputees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2161-2167. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001323.
PMID: 32452928BACKGROUNDDumanian GA, Potter BK, Mioton LM, Ko JH, Cheesborough JE, Souza JM, Ertl WJ, Tintle SM, Nanos GP, Valerio IL, Kuiken TA, Apkarian AV, Porter K, Jordan SW. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Treats Neuroma and Phantom Pain in Major Limb Amputees: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):238-246. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003088.
PMID: 30371518BACKGROUNDDellon AL, Mackinnon SE. Treatment of the painful neuroma by neuroma resection and muscle implantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Mar;77(3):427-38. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198603000-00016.
PMID: 2937074BACKGROUNDIves GC, Kung TA, Nghiem BT, Ursu DC, Brown DL, Cederna PS, Kemp SWP. Current State of the Surgical Treatment of Terminal Neuromas. Neurosurgery. 2018 Sep 1;83(3):354-364. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx500.
PMID: 29053875BACKGROUNDPoyntz SA, Hacking NM, Dalal M, Fowler S. Peripheral Interventions for Painful Stump Neuromas of the Lower Limb: A Systematic Review. Clin J Pain. 2018 Mar;34(3):285-295. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000533.
PMID: 28678059BACKGROUNDNederlandse Vereniging van Revalidatieartsen. Amputatie en prothesiologie onderste extremiteit. Available from: https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/richtlijn/amputatie_prothesiologie_onderste_extremiteit/startpagina_-_amputatie_en_prothesiologie_onderste_extremiteit.html.
BACKGROUNDSchwingler PM, Moman RN, Hunt C, Ashmore Z, Ogletree SP, Uvodich ME, Murad MH, Hooten WM. Prevalence of postamputation pain and its subtypes: a meta-analysis with meta-regression. Pain Rep. 2021 May 4;6(1):e918. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000918. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33981935BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Justus L. Groen, MD, PhD
Leiden University Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 15, 2025
First Posted
May 26, 2026
Study Start
August 14, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 20, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 20, 2029
Last Updated
May 26, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05