The Efficacy of Preventive Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface(RPNI) Reconstruction in Amputees
The Efficacy, Safety and Prognosis of Preventive Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface(RPNI) Reconstruction in Amputees: Study Protocol for a Cohort Study
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The trial will be carried out in Peking University People's Hospital. The whole trial will last 3 years. Amputees from orthopedics and vascular surgery will be distributed into two groups randomly and receive different treatments including traditional resection and regenerative peripheral nerve interface(RPNI) surgery.The pain outcome,the impact of post-amputation pain on life and the utilization rate of prostheses will be collected to study the efficacy, safety and prognosis of preventive regenerative peripheral nerve interface reconstruction in amputees. Investigators believe that RPNI can effectively reduce the incidence of post-amputation pain, reduce the degree of pain, improve the wearing rate of prostheses, and help patients return to normal life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 12, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 3, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedSeptember 26, 2022
September 1, 2022
3.6 years
September 3, 2022
September 21, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
postamputation pain
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (NRS, PROMIS) were used to assess postamputation pain.The intensity of pain is described by 11 points from 0 (painless) to 10 (the most severe pain).
12 weeks at least after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Prosthesis wearing
12 weeks at least after surgery
Tumor recurrence and metastasis
12 weeks at least after surgery
Quality of life
12 weeks at least after surgery
Study Arms (2)
The control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group received traditional amputation.The proximal nerve is blocked with lidocaine and cut off. The end of the nerve retracted as far as possible and the bleeding point is ligated if necessary.
The experimental group(RPNIs group)
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group received regenerative peripheral nerve interface(RPNI) surgery.
Interventions
Each RPNI unit consists of nerve stump and free autologous muscle graft that is cut off from healthy muscle of the amputated limb. The muscle graft is approximately 30×15×5 mm.The ends of the transected nerve are placed within the muscle belly of the free muscle grafts in an orientation that is parallel to the muscle fibers. Next, the nerve is secured distally with 6-0 non-absorbable monofilament sutures in an epimysial-to-epineurial fashion. The nerve is then wrapped around completely via muscle graft and epimysial securing sutures. All RPNI units are placed in areas remote from the surgical incision and from the weight-bearing surface of the limb.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Perform traditional amputation and nerve disconnection or RPNIs in Peking University People's Hospital
- Age≥6 years
- Follow-up time≥12 weeks
You may not qualify if:
- Follow-up time\<12 weeks
- Age\<6 years
- Preoperative complications included cervical spondylosis, lumbar spinal stenosis, piriformis syndrome, cubital tunnel syndrome and other peripheral nerve entrapment syndrome
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Peking University People's Hospital
Beijing, China
Related Publications (17)
Watson J, Gonzalez M, Romero A, Kerns J. Neuromas of the hand and upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Mar;35(3):499-510. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.12.019.
PMID: 20193866BACKGROUNDZimmermann M. Pathobiology of neuropathic pain. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001 Oct 19;429(1-3):23-37. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)01303-6.
PMID: 11698024BACKGROUNDBowsher D. Human "autotomy". Pain. 2002 Jan;95(1-2):187-9. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00389-x.
PMID: 11790481BACKGROUNDNiederberger E, Kuhlein H, Geisslinger G. Update on the pathobiology of neuropathic pain. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2008 Dec;5(6):799-818. doi: 10.1586/14789450.5.6.799.
PMID: 19086860BACKGROUNDMcFarland LV, Hubbard Winkler SL, Heinemann AW, Jones M, Esquenazi A. Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):299-316. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.03.0027.
PMID: 20803400BACKGROUNDDavis RW. Phantom sensation, phantom pain, and stump pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Jan;74(1):79-91.
PMID: 8380543BACKGROUNDVlot MA, Wilkens SC, Chen NC, Eberlin KR. Symptomatic Neuroma Following Initial Amputation for Traumatic Digital Amputation. J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Jan;43(1):86.e1-86.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.08.021. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
PMID: 28951100BACKGROUNDIves GC, Kung TA, Nghiem BT, Ursu DC, Brown DL, Cederna PS, Kemp SWP. Current State of the Surgical Treatment of Terminal Neuromas. Neurosurgery. 2018 Sep 1;83(3):354-364. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx500.
PMID: 29053875BACKGROUNDPoppler LH, Parikh RP, Bichanich MJ, Rebehn K, Bettlach CR, Mackinnon SE, Moore AM. Surgical interventions for the treatment of painful neuroma: a comparative meta-analysis. Pain. 2018 Feb;159(2):214-223. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001101.
PMID: 29189515BACKGROUNDBarbour JR, Yee A, Moore AM, Trulock EP, Buchowski JM, Mackinnon SE. Cadaveric nerve allotransplantation in the treatment of persistent thoracic neuralgia. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Apr;99(4):1414-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.092.
PMID: 25841822BACKGROUNDElliot D. Surgical management of painful peripheral nerves. Clin Plast Surg. 2014 Jul;41(3):589-613. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2014.03.004.
PMID: 24996473BACKGROUNDLipinski LJ, Spinner RJ. Neurolysis, neurectomy, and nerve repair/reconstruction for chronic pain. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Oct;25(4):777-87. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
PMID: 25240664BACKGROUNDKuiken TA, Miller LA, Lipschutz RD, Lock BA, Stubblefield K, Marasco PD, Zhou P, Dumanian GA. Targeted reinnervation for enhanced prosthetic arm function in a woman with a proximal amputation: a case study. Lancet. 2007 Feb 3;369(9559):371-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60193-7.
PMID: 17276777BACKGROUNDPeters BR, Russo SA, West JM, Moore AM, Schulz SA. Targeted muscle reinnervation for the management of pain in the setting of major limb amputation. SAGE Open Med. 2020 Sep 15;8:2050312120959180. doi: 10.1177/2050312120959180. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32974021BACKGROUNDSantosa KB, Oliver JD, Cederna PS, Kung TA. Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for Prevention and Management of Neuromas. Clin Plast Surg. 2020 Apr;47(2):311-321. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
PMID: 32115057BACKGROUNDKubiak CA, Kemp SWP, Cederna PS, Kung TA. Prophylactic Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces to Prevent Postamputation Pain. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep;144(3):421e-430e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005922.
PMID: 31461024BACKGROUNDWoo SL, Urbanchek MG, Cederna PS, Langhals NB. Revisiting nonvascularized partial muscle grafts: a novel use for prosthetic control. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Aug;134(2):344e-346e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000317. No abstract available.
PMID: 25068369BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The investigator who perform the operations cannot be blinded because of the use of manual techniques.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2022
First Posted
September 26, 2022
Study Start
May 12, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
September 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share