Transumbilical Versus Infraumbilical Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
125
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The case study is planned to emanate a comparison between transumbilical pneumoperitoneum and infraumbilical in patients that undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It concentrates on the port access time, events during intraoperative access, postoperative change of events, pain, hospitalization, and cosmetic satisfaction. Through evaluation of both technical and patient centred outcomes, this study can help elucidate on whether transumbilical approach possesses practical benefits compared with its alternative, the conventional method of infraumbilical, without adding risk to the operations. These findings can justify other safer, more efficient and aesthetically correct primary port placement in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 9, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 8, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 8, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2026
CompletedMay 22, 2026
May 1, 2026
3 months
May 15, 2026
May 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of complications
bleeding, vessel injury, bowel injury
day 1
Study Arms (2)
Transumbilical pneumoperitoneum
EXPERIMENTALInfraumbilical pneumoperitoneum
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
In transumbilical group, umbilical cicatrix was incised and primary port was inserted by the use of the transumbilical route to create pneumoperitoneum.
In the infraumbilical group, a skin incision was made just below the umbilicus, and the primary port was introduced through the infraumbilical route. Another routine surgical procedure at the study center was the creation of a pneumoperitoneum. Once pneumoperitoneum was created successfully, laparoscope was inserted and the rest of ports were done under direct vision as per the traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone disease (biliary colic, cholecystitis, gallbladder polyps requiring surgery).
- Both elective and emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases.
- Patients of both genders
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with choledocholithiasis, obstructive jaundice, or dilated common bile duct requiring ERCP or alternative interventions.
- Patients undergoing a planned open cholecystectomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pakistan Railway Hospital
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 60000, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2026
First Posted
May 22, 2026
Study Start
February 9, 2026
Primary Completion
May 8, 2026
Study Completion
May 8, 2026
Last Updated
May 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05