Comparison of Anaesthesia Requirement for Ventilation With Endotracheal Tube Versus Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway
Anaesthesia Requirements for Ventilation With Endotracheal Tube Versus ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway During Automated Feedback-Loop Controlled Total Intravenous Anaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomised Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endotracheal tube (ETT) is the gold standard conduit for providing controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia (GA). however, the supra-glottic airway (SGA) devices in particular the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and its variants have become a reliable alternative to ETT for carrying out controlled ventilation. Of the several variants of LMA available today, the proseal LMA (PLMA) is preferred for controlled ventilation. The various advantages of LMA includes, a lower incidence of postoperative sore throat and superior haemodynamic profile during surgery. However, one aspect of providing anaesthesia with LMA compared to ETT is the ability of LMA to maintain equivalent depth of anaesthesia with lower anaesthetic requirement, is quiet intriguing and evidence to this regard is very limited. By measuring the anaesthesia requirement using a robust computerised delivery system such as the closed loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS) we can establish for sure the anaesthesia required for maintaining intraoperative mechanical ventilation with the use of these two (ETT and PLMA) airway management devices. This randomised controlled study aims to calculate the anaesthesia requirement as determined by the total amount of propofol consumed for maintaining anaesthesia with ETT versus PLMA
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 4, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
April 27, 2026
April 1, 2026
7.7 years
January 19, 2019
April 22, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Propofol usage in milligrams
Comparison of quantitative difference in propofol requirement between the two groups
From beginning of anaesthesia (0-hours, baseline) till 4 hours intraoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Anaesthesia depth consistency using BIS scores
From beginning of anaesthesia (0-hours, baseline) till 3 hours intraoperatively
Evaluation of propofol anaesthesia delivery system
From beginning of anaesthesia (0-hours, baseline) till 3 hours intraoperatively
Change in Intra-operative heart Rate (beats per minute)
From beginning of anaesthesia (0-hours, baseline) till 3 hours intraoperatively
Change in Intra-operative systolic , diastolic, and mean (mmHg)
From beginning of anaesthesia (0-hours, baseline) till 10 hours intraoperatively
Early Recovery from anesthesia
From end of anaesthesia till 20-minutes postoperatively
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ETT Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnesthesia will be induced with fentanyl-citrate (3µg/kg) and propofol (dose determined by automated system based on continuous BIS feedback from the patients). Atracurium besylate 0.5-mg/kg will be given to facilitate placement of airway device. Propofol administration rate will be controlled by a feedback loop facilitated by BIS monitoring using the closed-loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS). A BIS value of 50 will be used as the target point for induction and maintenance of GA. Intraoperative ventilation will be instituted through a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) ETT (Portex, Smiths Medical ASD, Inc, Minneapolis, USA). The size of the tube will be standardized for the male (7.5 mm ID) and the female (6.5 MM ID).
PLMA Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnesthesia will be induced with fentanyl-citrate (3µg/kg) and propofol (dose determined by automated system based on continuous BIS feedback from the patients). Atracurium besylate 0.5-mg/kg will be given to facilitate placement of airway device. Propofol administration rate will be controlled by a feedback loop facilitated by BIS monitoring using the closed-loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS). A BIS value of 50 will be used as the target point for induction and maintenance of GA. intraoperative ventilation will be maintained with PLMA (Telefex Medical, Westmeath Ireland) whose size would be selected based on body weight. In patients weighing 30-50 kg PLMA # 3.0, 50-70 kg PLMA # 4.0, and 50-100 kg PLMA # 5.0 will be inserted.
Interventions
After induction of anaesthesia patient will be intubated with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) ETT for maintaining intraoperative ventilation. Anaesthesia will be maintained with propofol and the administration rate will be controlled by a feedback loop facilitated by BIS monitoring using the closed-loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS). A BIS value of 50 will be used as the target point for induction and maintenance of GA.
After induction of anaesthesia ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) will be inserted for maintaining intraoperative ventilation. Anaesthesia will be maintained with propofol and the administration rate will be controlled by a feedback loop facilitated by BIS monitoring using the closed-loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS). A BIS value of 50 will be used as the target point for induction and maintenance of GA.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA physical status I/II
- Undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
You may not qualify if:
- Anticipated difficult airway
- Body mass index \> 30-kg/m2
- Uncompensated cardiovascular disease (e.g. uncontrolled hypertension, atrio-ventricular block, sinus bradycardia, congenital heart disease, reduced LV compliance, diastolic dysfunction)
- Hepato-renal insufficiency
- Uncontrolled endocrinology disease (e.g. diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism)
- Known allergy/hypersensitivity to the study drug (propofol)
- Drug dependence/substance abuse/psychiatric illness
- Requirement of postoperative ventilation
- Refusal to informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sir Ganga Ram Hospital
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110060, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nitin Sethi, DNB
Sir Ganga Ram Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Amitabh Dutta, MD
Sir Ganga Ram Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Jayashree Sood, MD, FFRCA
Sir Ganga Ram Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The attending anaesthesiologist will not be blinded to the technique utilized to administer GA. An independent assessor unaware of the technique utilized for administering GA will analyse the intraoperative data and conduct the postoperative follow up
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant & Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2019
First Posted
January 23, 2019
Study Start
March 4, 2019
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share