NCT07600606

Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a healthy diet promotion intervention focused on increasing legume consumption. The intervention is delivered via mobile application in a sample drawn from the healthy adult population.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
682

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 17, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 13, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 13, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 6, 2026

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 20, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 20, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

May 6, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 13, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

legumeswell-beingfood educationhealthy dietcommunication strategies

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Portions of purchased legumes - task 1 - simulation on online grocery shopping

    In the first task, specifically designed for the present study, participants are asked to complete a simulated online grocery shopping for the following week. The task is structured to closely resemble a real shopping experience: each item can be added to the virtual cart in a potentially unlimited number of units, with higher values indicating larger quantities purchased and a value of zero indicating that the item was not selected. The primary outcome will consist of the total number of legume-based items selected, subsequently converted into servings. This conversion process will be carried out by the nutrition research team.

    T1 - day 3. After compiling the baseline assessment (T0) at day 1, participants received the link to complete the second part of the survey at day 3, which was to be completed by the end of the day.

  • Explicit attitudes about legumes

    Participants were asked to express their opinions about legumes using six different bipolar scales, introduced with the following instruction: "Now think about legumes (e.g., chickpeas, peas, beans, lentils, broad beans). Which adjectives do you consider most appropriate to describe them? Please respond to each pair of adjectives without overthinking your answer." The bipolar adjective pairs were as follows: negative-positive; bland-tasty; isolating-convivial; unsatisfying-satiating; difficult-easy; loser-winner. Responses were recorded on 7-point scales ranging from 1 (indicating the negative pole of each adjective pair) to 7 (indicating the positive pole of each adjective pair).

    T1 - day 3. After compiling the baseline assessment (T0) at day 1, participants received the link to complete the second part of the survey at day 3, which was to be completed by day 3.

  • Swipe Approach-Avoidance Task (SwipeAAT)

    The Swipe Approach-Avoidance Task (SwipeAAT) is a smartphone-based version of the Approach-Avoidance Task, in which participants interact with visual stimuli according to specific instructions. Stimuli must either be "approached" (by swiping upward) or "avoided" (by swiping downward) depending on the instructions provided. Reaction times recorded during task performance are analyzed to infer spontaneous behavioral tendencies of approach or avoidance toward the presented stimuli. To assess spontaneous approach and avoidance tendencies toward legumes and meat, two scores were computed for each participant: Legume SwipeAAT score, calculated as the difference between the mean of all valid latencies (see Data Exclusion) for the "Avoid legumes" trials and the "Approach legumes" trials. Meat SwipeAAT score, calculated as the difference between the mean of all valid latencies (see Data Exclusion) for the "Avoid meat" trials and the "Approach meat" trials.

    T1 - day 3. After compiling the baseline assessment (T0) at day 1, participants received the link to complete the second part of the survey at day 3, which was to be completed by day 3.

  • Intention to increase legumes portions in the future - single ad hoc item

    Participants were asked to report their future intention to increase their weekly consumption of legumes using a single-item measure ("Do you intend to increase your consumption of legumes in the near future?"). Responses were provided on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("absolutely not") to 5 ("absolutely yes").

    T1 - day 3. After compiling the baseline assessment (T0) at day 1, participants received the link to complete the second part of the survey at day 3, which was to be completed by day 3.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Portions of other purchased items - task 1 - simulation on online grocery shopping

    T1 - day 3. After compiling the baseline assessment (T0) at day 1, participants received the link to complete the second part of the survey at day 3, which was to be completed by day 3.

Study Arms (3)

Educational

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants watch a video with an educational content and communicative style about the benefits of eating legumes

Other: Educational

Persuasive

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants watch a video with an educational content and a persuasive communicative style about the benefits of eating legumes

Other: Persuasive

Tailored

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants watch a video with a persuasive communicative style and tailored content about the benefits of eating legumes

Other: Tailored

Interventions

Participants watch an educational video about the benefits of eating legumes. Then, they perform the grocery shopping simulation and the automatic task for approach/avoidance assessment

Educational

Participants watch a persuasive video with educational content about the benefits of eating legumes. Then, they perform the grocery shopping simulation

Persuasive

Participants watch a persuasive video with a tailored content about the benefits of eating legumes. Then, they perform the grocery shopping simulation

Tailored

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 30 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • be university students (enrolled in a bachelor's degree, master's degree/specialized degree/single-cycle degree program, or postgraduate education);
  • own a smartphone.

You may not qualify if:

  • consume an adequate amount of legumes (\> 3 servings);
  • suffer from one or more conditions that could represent a contraindication to the consumption of certain specific categories of legumes, such as favism, allergies, irritable bowel syndrome, short bowel syndrome and/or leaky gut, forms of intestinal dysbiosis, or other intestinal disorders.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1

Milan, 20126, Italy

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Igartua JJ, Rodriguez-Contreras L. Narrative Voice Matters! Improving Smoking Prevention with Testimonial Messages through Identification and Cognitive Processes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 5;17(19):7281. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197281.

    PMID: 33028030BACKGROUND
  • Cheng G, Li W, He M, Liao L. Exploring consumer responses to official endorsement: roles of credibility and attractiveness attributes in live streaming. Front Psychol. 2024 May 20;15:1371343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1371343. eCollection 2024.

    PMID: 38831950BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Patrizia Steca

    University of Milan-Bicocca

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Maria Elide Vanutelli

    University of Milan-Bicocca

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2026

First Posted

May 20, 2026

Study Start

November 17, 2025

Primary Completion

March 13, 2026

Study Completion

March 13, 2026

Last Updated

May 20, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations