NCT07600372

Brief Summary

This study compared the effects of High-Velocity Low-Amplitude (HVLA) thrust and Post-Isometric Relaxation Muscle Energy Technique (PIR-MET) on pain and shoulder mobility in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Sixty-six participants received either HVLA or PIR-MET with conventional physiotherapy for four weeks. Both treatments improved pain and range of motion, but PIR-MET showed significantly greater improvement, making it a more effective approach for managing frozen shoulder symptoms.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
66

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 9, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 29, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 6, 2026

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 14, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 20, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 20, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

May 14, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 14, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Adhesive Capsulitis, Frozen Shoulder, HVLA Thrust, PIR-MET, Shoulder Pain, Shoulder Mobility, Manual

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain

    Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a 10 cm scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Participants marked their perceived shoulder pain level before and after the four-week intervention period.

    Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention

Study Arms (2)

Group A- HVLA Thrust

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group received high velocity, low amplitude thrust manipulation to the glenohumeral joint. Treatment was delivered by a trained physical therapist. The intervention aimed to restore joint mobility and reduce pain in patients diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis. Sessions were conducted 3 times per week for 12 weeks, in addition to a standardized home exercise program.

Behavioral: High Velocity Low Amplitude Thrust

Group-B MET

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group received muscle energy technique applied to the shoulder muscles to improve range of motion and decrease pain. The technique involved active contraction of the patient against manual resistance followed by stretching. Sessions were conducted 3 times per week for 12 weeks, in addition to a standardized home exercise program.

Behavioral: Muscle Energy Technique

Interventions

A manual therapy technique involving a quick, controlled thrust applied to the glenohumeral joint at the end of the available range of motion. The goal is to improve joint play and mobility. Each session lasted approximately 10-15 minutes. The intervention was performed 3 times per week for 12 weeks. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study.

Also known as: HVLA Thrust
Group A- HVLA Thrust

An active manual therapy technique where the patient contracts the shoulder muscles against the therapist's resistance, followed by a passive stretch. Target muscles included the posterior capsule, pectoralis major, and rotator cuff as indicated. Each session lasted approximately 15-20 minutes. The intervention was performed 3 times per week for 12 weeks.

Also known as: MET
Group-B MET

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants diagnosed with Stage II or III Adhesive Capsulitis Age between 40 and 65 years Both male and female participants Presence of shoulder pain and restricted range of motion for at least 3 months Limitation of active and passive shoulder movements, particularly external rotation Willingness to participate and provide informed consent Ability to attend treatment sessions for four weeks

You may not qualify if:

  • History of shoulder fracture, dislocation, or recent trauma Previous shoulder surgery Neurological disorders affecting shoulder function Rheumatoid arthritis or other systemic inflammatory conditions Cervical radiculopathy or referred pain from the cervical spine Rotator cuff tear or severe shoulder instability Malignancy or infection involving the shoulder joint Participants receiving other concurrent shoulder treatments Contraindications to manual therapy or physiotherapy interventions Unwillingness to participate or inability to complete the treatment protocol

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Principal Investigator

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

BursitisShoulder Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesArthralgiaPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
This study was single-blinded. Participants were unaware of their treatment group allocation throughout the intervention period to minimize performance and response bias. Care providers and investigators administering the interventions were not blinded due to the nature of the manual therapy techniques.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study used a parallel-group randomized controlled trial design. A total of 66 participants diagnosed with Stage II or III Adhesive Capsulitis were randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group A received High-Velocity Low-Amplitude (HVLA) thrust manipulation combined with conventional physiotherapy, while Group B received Post-Isometric Relaxation Muscle Energy Technique (PIR-MET) combined with conventional physiotherapy. Both groups underwent treatment sessions for four weeks. Conventional physiotherapy included moist heat application, range-of-motion exercises, stretching, and strengthening exercises. Outcome measures included pain intensity assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and shoulder range of motion measured using a universal goniometer before and after the intervention period.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal InvestigatorG

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2026

First Posted

May 20, 2026

Study Start

November 9, 2025

Primary Completion

April 29, 2026

Study Completion

May 6, 2026

Last Updated

May 20, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Only IPD used in the result publication will be shared

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
It will be available after the completion of study
Access Criteria
De-identified participant data, including demographic details, pain scores, shoulder range-of-motion data, study protocol, and analysis information, will be available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request and approval. Access will be provided through secure electronic sharing while maintaining participant confidentiality and ethical standards.

Locations