Suprainguinal Facia Iliaca Block in Maximizing the Feasibility of Positioning for Spinal Anesthesia
Effectiveness of Suprainguinal Facia Iliaca Block in Maximizing the Feasibility of Positioning for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Hip and Proximal Femur Fractures, a Placebo Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, we assessed the effect of suprainguinal facia iliaca block in maximizing the feasibility of positioning for spinal anaesthesia in patients with hip and proximal femur fractures by determining the angle that could be achieved and success rate of spinal anesthesia The control group received a sham block with the same technique of suprainguinal fascia iliaca block before being given spinal anaesthesia. The interventional group received suprainguinal fascia iliaca block before being given spinal anaesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 18, 2026
CompletedMay 18, 2026
May 1, 2026
2.2 years
May 12, 2026
May 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Degree of Fowler's position
Measure and compare the maximum tolerable degree of Fowler's position after fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) and sham block in order to give spinal anaesthesia.
30 minutes after the fascia iliaca compartment block or sham block and till the full sitting position before spinal anaesthesia.
Study Arms (2)
Fascia iliaca compartment block
ACTIVE COMPARATORFascia iliaca block was performed at the pre-anaesthesia holding area 30 minutes before shifting the patients to the operation room with 30 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine.
Sham group
SHAM COMPARATORSham block was performed at the pre-anaesthesia holding area 30 minutes before shifting the patients to the operation room with 30 ml normal saline.
Interventions
Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) was performed at the pre-anaesthesia holding area 30 minutes before shifting the patients to the operation room with 30 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine.
Sham block was performed at the pre-anaesthesia holding area 30 minutes before shifting the patients to the operation room with 30 ml normal saline.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients are ASA I (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status grade I) = normal healthy patients, ASA II (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status grade II) = patients with mild systemic disease and no functional limitations, or ASA III (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status grade III) = patients with moderate systemic disease and some functional limitations.
- Patients having hip and/or proximal femur fractures.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal to participate in the study
- Patients' refusal for regional anaesthesia
- Patients have other combined fractures rather than unilateral hip or proximal femur fractures.
- Underlying coagulopathies.
- Local infection.
- Known allergy to LA.
- Body mass index (BMI) more than 40 kg/m².
- Heart block greater than first-degree.
- Renal and hepatic dysfunction.
- Neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's and dementia or apparent psychological instability.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University
Ismailia, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The patient and the caregiver were blinded to the injectate in the procedure. The investigator was blinded to the solution that was used for the block, as a third person had prepared the injectate. The one who assessed the sitting angle was blinded to the group of the patient.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2026
First Posted
May 18, 2026
Study Start
September 1, 2022
Primary Completion
November 30, 2024
Study Completion
January 30, 2026
Last Updated
May 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05