Using Artificial Intelligence To Improve Ventilator Settings For Intensive Care Patients
Research on Intelligent Optimization of Ventilator Parameters for Intensive Care Patients Based on Multimodal Large Models
1 other identifier
observational
2,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This observational study aims to determine whether an AI-assisted decision support system can improve clinical outcomes for mechanically ventilated pediatric patients (aged 1 month to 18 years) in the PICU, compared to standard care provided by medical staff. The primary question addressed is: Do patients whose ventilator parameter optimization decisions are guided by AI assistance achieve a greater number of ventilator-free days within 28 days than those managed by medical staff? By utilizing clinical data collected following tracheal intubation to generate AI-driven recommendations-and comparing these against the actual adjustments made by physicians-this study seeks to assess whether the AI-assisted decision support system can effectively improve clinical outcomes for mechanically ventilated patients in the PICU.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2021
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 18, 2026
CompletedMay 18, 2026
May 1, 2026
5 years
May 10, 2026
May 15, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of ventilator-free days within 28 days
Days survived and free from invasive ventilation
From the start of tracheal intubation until 28 days after tracheal intubation.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
mortality rate
28 and 90 days after the initiation of tracheal intubation
Mechanical Ventilation-Related Complications
From the start of tracheal intubation to Day 28
Length of Hospital Stay
The duration from the time of admission to discharge for pediatric patients-up to a maximum of three months.
Artificial Intelligence System Evaluation
From the start of tracheal intubation to Day 28
Health Economics
The duration from the time of admission to discharge for pediatric patients-up to a maximum of three months.
Study Arms (1)
AI-Assisted Ventilator Parameter Optimization in Pediatric ICU
Clinical data from key time points following tracheal intubation in each pediatric patient were input into an AI system to generate recommendations. These recommendations were then compared against the actual adjustments made by physicians, enabling a counterfactual assessment to determine whether-had the AI's suggestions been adopted-the number of ventilator-free days within a 28-day period would have been superior.
Eligibility Criteria
Pediatric patients aged 1 month to 18 years admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University and Yuying Children's Hospital, who are receiving mechanical ventilation.
You may qualify if:
- PICU patients aged 1 month to 18 years.
- Receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, expected to last ≥ 48 hours.
- Informed consent signed prior to enrollment.
You may not qualify if:
- Expected survival \< 24 hours
- Irreversible brain injury (GCS = 3 + absence of brainstem reflexes)
- Severe congenital cardiopulmonary malformations affecting ventilation assessment
- Pregnancy (must be ruled out in adolescent girls)
- Currently participating in other ventilation intervention trials
- Guardian refusal to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Wu Rongzhoulead
Study Sites (1)
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University and Yuying Children's Hospital
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325000, China
Related Publications (9)
Char DS, Shah NH, Magnus D. Implementing Machine Learning in Health Care - Addressing Ethical Challenges. N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 15;378(11):981-983. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1714229. No abstract available.
PMID: 29539284RESULTFleuren LM, Klausch TLT, Zwager CL, Schoonmade LJ, Guo T, Roggeveen LF, Swart EL, Girbes ARJ, Thoral P, Ercole A, Hoogendoorn M, Elbers PWG. Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Mar;46(3):383-400. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05872-y. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
PMID: 31965266RESULTGattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Herrmann P, Moerer O, Protti A, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Carlesso E, Chiumello D, Quintel M. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4505-2. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
PMID: 27620287RESULTPirracchio R, Petersen ML, Carone M, Rigon MR, Chevret S, van der Laan MJ. Mortality prediction in intensive care units with the Super ICU Learner Algorithm (SICULA): a population-based study. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Jan;3(1):42-52. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70239-5. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
PMID: 25466337RESULTChen JH, Asch SM. Machine Learning and Prediction in Medicine - Beyond the Peak of Inflated Expectations. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 29;376(26):2507-2509. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1702071. No abstract available.
PMID: 28657867RESULTKomorowski M, Celi LA, Badawi O, Gordon AC, Faisal AA. The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care. Nat Med. 2018 Nov;24(11):1716-1720. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0213-5. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
PMID: 30349085RESULTAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.
PMID: 10793162RESULTEsteva A, Robicquet A, Ramsundar B, Kuleshov V, DePristo M, Chou K, Cui C, Corrado G, Thrun S, Dean J. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):24-29. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
PMID: 30617335RESULTTopol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):44-56. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
PMID: 30617339RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2026
First Posted
May 18, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
May 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared, the study's ethical approvals and consent agreements do not permit public data sharing. Access may be considered upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, subject to institutional review and data use agreements to ensure patient privacy and compliance with regulations.