Intravenous Lidocaine for Hepatectomy
ILHEP
Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine on Postoperative Opioid Related-side Effects After Open HEPatectomy: a Multicentre Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
312
1 country
9
Brief Summary
Liver resection is increasingly performed for hepatic tumors, mainly primary liver cancers and resectable metastases, but also for some benign lesions. Postoperative pain is often significant, regardless of the surgical technique, making effective pain control essential to promote early mobilization and reduce complications. Current standard care relies on multimodal analgesia, combining several drugs administered during surgery, with morphine administered as rescue therapy when required. Morphine is associated with side effects such as nausea, vomiting, ileus, hypoxemia, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, and transient cognitive impairment. Therefore, there is a need to optimize pain management while reducing opioid consumption and related adverse effects. Intravenous (IV) lidocaine has well-documented anti-inflammatory effects and is effective against neuropathic pain. Several studies have shown that intravenous lidocaine may be associated with improved analgesia, reduced opioid consumption, shorter hospital stay, and decreased postoperative ileus, nausea, and vomiting-particularly in abdominal and genitourinary surgeries. Therefore, Intravenous (IV) lidocaine may be a valuable alternative for postoperative pain management after liver surgery. National guidelines now recommend perioperative Intravenous (IV) lidocaine for abdominal surgeries but its efficacy in liver surgery has not yet been established due to a lack of specific evidence (more specific data are needed). Findings from other types of abdominal surgery suggest a potential benefit, which should be confirmed by dedicated clinical trials and robust multicenter evaluation such as the ILHEP protocol. The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effect of intravenous perioperative lidocaine on postoperative opioid related-side effects and to formally confirm the safety of lidocaine during hepatic surgical procedures. The hypothesis is that Intravenous (IV) lidocaine compared with placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug e.g. a saline solution) would improve postoperative outcome by reducing opioid related side-effects in patients undergoing liver surgery and benefitting of the same baseline analgesia. In the context of this trial, patients will receive either intravenous lidocaine or placebo according to their assigned randomization group during standardized general anesthesia, and will then be followed throughout their hospital stay until discharge or up to a maximum of 28 days. An ancillary study will be conducted in patients enrolled at the coordinating center in Rennes to assess exposure to lidocaine during intravenous administration and to evaluate the relationship between blood concentrations and adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Aug 2026
Typical duration for phase_4
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 15, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2028
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2028
May 15, 2026
May 1, 2026
2.1 years
April 22, 2026
May 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare the effects of a perioperative lidocaine infusion versus placebo on the composite incidence of postoperative opioid-related adverse events, assessed blinded to the randomization group, in patients undergoing open hepatectomy.
Number of participants with at least one of the following postoperative opioid-related adverse events : Postoperative nausea and vomiting defined as any nausea or vomiting ; Postoperative hypoxemia defined as SpO2 \< 95% with a need for oxygen supplementation ; Postoperative ileus duration. Ileus is defined as an intolerance to an oral diet (e.g. soft food or light meal)
from Hour 0 (extubation) to Hour 48
Secondary Outcomes (22)
Determine the occurrence of postoperative opioid-related nausea and vomiting
from Hour 0 to Hour 48
Determine the occurrence of postoperative opioid-related hypoxemia
from Hour 0 to Hour 48
Determine the occurrence of postoperative opioid-related ileus
from Hour 0 to Hour 48
Determine the occurrence of postoperative opioid-related absence of flatus or stools
from Hour 0 to Hour 48
Determine if lidocaine is associated with a better postoperative analgesia at rest, as measured by the number of episodes with a Numeric Rating Scale score > 3, recorded every 10 minutes during post anesthesia care unit stay and every 6 hours thereafter.
from Hour 0 to Hour 48
- +17 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lidocaine Group
EXPERIMENTALStandard anaesthesia protocol with lidocaine
Control Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORStandard anaesthesia protocol with placebo (NaCl)
Interventions
Standard general anaesthesia induction protocol with pre-defined bolus of lidocaine and standard general anaesthesia maintenance protocol with pre-defined continuous intravenous infusion of lidocaine
Standard general anaesthesia induction protocol with pre-defined bolus of placebo and standard general anaesthesia maintenance protocol with pre-defined continuous intravenous infusion of placebo
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Known hypersensitivity to lidocaine hydrochloride, to amide-type local anesthetics, or to any of the excipients (sodium chloride, sodium hydroxide solution or concentrated hydrochloric acid solution, water for injection)
- Treatment with following antiarythmic medication : class I, class III or Sotalol
- Heart failure NYHA grade 3-4, AV-block \>1, without pacemaker
- Acute porphyria
- Recurrent porphyrias
- Uncontrolled epilepsy / Seizure at enrollment
- Renal insufficiency (Creatinine clearance \< 15 mL/min)
- Untreated glaucoma
- Uncontrolled epilepsy
- Allergy
- Renal insufficiency (Creatinine clearance \< 50 mL/min)
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Allergy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
Centre 03 - CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Hôpital Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand, 63100, France
Centre 04 - Centre Hospitalier Départemental de la Vendée
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85000, France
Centre 02 - CH Louis Pasteur, Les Hôpitaux de Chartres
Le Coudray, 28630, France
Centre 05 - CHU de Lille
Lille, 59000, France
Centre 06 - Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, 69008, France
Centre 07 - CHU Nice, Hôpital Archet 2
Nice, 06200, France
Centre 08 - AP-HP - Sorbonne Université, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière
Paris, 75013, France
Centre 01 - CHU de RENNES, Hôpital Pontchaillou
Rennes, 35000, France
Centre 09 - CHU Toulouse, Hôpital Rangueil
Toulouse, 31400, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2026
First Posted
May 15, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Last Updated
May 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05