NCT01874639

Brief Summary

Blood loss in hepatic surgery is the main factor of postoperative morbidity. The use of the most effective possible tool for hemostasis allows a bleeding decrease during liver transection and thus could reduce postoperative morbidity. In the past decade, the improvement of techniques of transection of the hepatic parenchyma was one of the most important factors to ensure the hepatectomy safety. But the clinical performances of these technological innovations (ultrasound dissectors, monopolar radiofrequency probes and dissection devices using pressurized water) remain still unclear. The medical device of hemostasis Aquamantys® (Salient company, Innopath) use the technology of "transcollation" combining a source of radiofrequency associated with a conductive liquid (NaCl 0.9% solution). The system consists of a specific generator (Aquamantys Pump Generator®) and single-use probes (Aquamantys 2.3 BipolarSealer®). The energy of radiofrequency is delivered by two bipolar electrodes. The innovative aspect of this device consists in maintaining the tissue to a temperature of 100°C, while using a conductive liquid which acts as process of cooling and avoids the drying out of tissues, smoke, risks of electric arc and overheating met with conventional electrosurgery. This device allows the coagulation of blood vessels but also bile ducts. The Aquamantys® system could decrease the postoperative morbidity and mortality due to a decrease of blood loss and biliary leak. These clinical benefits could be translated by an improvement of the direct and indirect costs associated to the surgery. However the Aquamantys® technology has not been scientifically validated in the context of the hepatic surgery, and this technology is expensive due to the purchase of single-use bipolar probes (Aquamantys 2.3 BipolarSealer®) and to the investment in a generator (Aquamantys Pump Generator®). Consequently, it is essential to realize a study measuring the clinical and medical economic impact of the transcollation technology (Aquamantys® device) in the hepatic surgery.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2013

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2013

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 7, 2013

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 11, 2013

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

July 29, 2016

Status Verified

July 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

June 7, 2013

Last Update Submit

July 28, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Hepatectomyblood losshemostasiscoagulationLiver surgery (benign or malign)Resection of 2 or more segments

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Blood loss during surgery

    at day 0

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Duration of liver transection

    at day 0

  • Duration of surgery

    at day 0

  • Duration of hospital stay

    at day 1

  • Number of red blood cells transfusions

    at day 0

  • Number of frozen plasma transfusions

    at day 0

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

hepatectomy ( conventional hemostasis )

EXPERIMENTAL

After validation of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the patients include in this clinical trial will be randomized between the two arms of the study: \- Control group: hepatectomy with conventional hemostasis using standard bipolar coagulation

Device: standard bipolar coagulation

hepatectomy with Aquamantys

OTHER

After validation of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the patients include in this clinical trial will be randomized between the two arms of the study: \- Test group: hepatectomy with Aquamantys®

Device: Aquamantys® probe for liver hemostasis

Interventions

hepatectomy ( conventional hemostasis )
hepatectomy with Aquamantys

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing elective surgery for liver resection of malignant or benign disease
  • Hepatic resection of two or more segments
  • No coagulation disorder
  • No portal hypertension (platelets ≥ 100 G/L, absence of splenomegaly, absence of portal hypertension varices)
  • Obtaining the patient's written consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \< 18 years and \> 80 years
  • ASA score \> 3
  • Cirrhosis, liver fibrosis \> F2, steatosis \> 60%, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome
  • Cognitive troubles and major disability making impossible to understand the study and signed the informed consent (e.g. dementia, psychiatric disorders like psychosis, speech disorder ...)
  • Liver and kidney failure
  • Pregnancy and lactating women
  • Legal incapacity
  • Patients already enrolled in a clinical trial

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HemorrhageThrombosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsEmbolism and ThrombosisVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Emmanuel BUC

    University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2013

First Posted

June 11, 2013

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2016

Study Completion

December 1, 2016

Last Updated

July 29, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-07

Locations