NCT07590245

Brief Summary

This randomized controlled trial investigated the comparative effects of sensory, motor, and combined sensorimotor interventions on hand motor function and behavioral performance in patients with stroke. The study focused on upper-extremity impairments, particularly deficits in hand strength, dexterity, and reaction time, which are common following stroke and substantially limit functional independence. Sensorimotor integration plays a critical role in motor recovery, as effective hand function depends on the interaction between sensory feedback and motor control mechanisms. Participants with stroke were randomly assigned to sensory, motor, or combined sensorimotor intervention groups. The interventions were designed to target tactile perception, motor coordination, and integrated sensorimotor processing through attended active and passive stimulation approaches. Outcome measures included hand grip strength, manual dexterity, and reaction time, which were evaluated before and after the intervention period. The findings demonstrated that sensorimotor-based rehabilitation approaches positively influenced upper-extremity motor performance and behavioral responses in stroke patients. In particular, combined sensorimotor interventions appeared to provide more comprehensive improvements by simultaneously enhancing sensory processing and motor execution. These results support the importance of integrating sensory-focused strategies into conventional motor rehabilitation programs to optimize neuroplasticity and functional recovery after stroke. The study contributes to the growing evidence supporting multidimensional rehabilitation approaches for improving hand function and sensorimotor performance in individuals with stroke.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
81

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 6, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 25, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2026

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 11, 2026

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 15, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 18, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

May 11, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 15, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

handexercisestrokemuscle strength

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Moberg Pick-up Test (MPUT)

    Hand function was evaluated using the Moberg Pick-up Test (MPUT), a standardized method for assessing functional hand use and fine-motor skills, specifically measuring the ability to grasp and manipulate small objects. During the test, participants were instructed to pick up various small objects (e.g., coins and small blocks) and place them in a container as quickly as possible. During the test, the participants were instructed to pick up various small objects and place them in a container as quickly as possible. The assessment was conducted with the dominant hand, first with eyes open and then with eyes closed, to test sensory function. For each condition, the test was repeated three times, and the best performance time, recorded in seconds, was used for analysis. The objects used in the test were of similar size and required coordinated hand movements for successful completion, ensuring consistency in task difficulty

    immediately after the intervention

  • Muscle Reaction Time

    Light Trainer® system, which consists of a wireless lighting system with LED pods and a central controller. The participants were seated with their hands on the table, 40 cm apart, palms down, and elbows at 90°. The Light Trainer was positioned centrally 20 cm away from each hand. When the pod was illuminated, the participants were instructed to turn off the light as quickly as possible by touching it. Light activation was randomized to avoid predictability, requiring participants to respond based on light cues each time. In the first task, the participants used their dominant hand to turn off the light as quickly as possible. In the second task, they responded to a light signal by deactivating a predetermined light from two different colors using their dominant hand. Scale Range: No minimum or maximum value in milliseconds (lower time is better). Interpretation: Lower reaction times signify better outcomes, as they reflect faster muscle response to visual stimuli.

    immediately after the intervention

  • Grip Strength (Measured Using Jamar Electronic Dynamometer)

    Hand performance was assessed based on grip strength using a Takei Handheld Dynamometer (Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Tokyo, Japan). Participants were seated with elbows flexed at 90 degrees and forearms in a neutral position, and were instructed to squeeze the dynamometer with maximum force for 3-5 seconds, with the palm facing upwards. Each hand was tested three times with a 20-second rest between trials, and the highest value was recorded. This protocol ensures standardized and consistent results, with measurements documented in kilograms (kg) to provide reliable grip strength assessment. Scale Range: The dynamometer measures from 0 to 90 kg. Interpretation: Higher scores reflect stronger grip strength, which is indicative of better hand function.

    immediately after the intervention

Study Arms (4)

Sensory Exercise Group

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: The Sensory Exercise Group

Motor Exercise Group

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: The Motor Exercise Group

Combined Sensory and Motor Exercise Group

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Sensory and Motor Exercise Group

Control

NO INTERVENTION

The control group did not receive any additional treatments during the study period, allowing for a clear comparison between the experimental group and the baseline conditions.

Interventions

In the Combined Sensorimotor Group (CSMG), sensory and motor exercises were applied according to the protocols used in the Sensory Exercise Group (SEG) and Motor Exercise Group (MEG). However, each exercise was performed as a single set, with the remaining session time allocated to superficial massage and sensory stimulation. The sensory and motor components were administered sequentially, with each phase lasting approximately 7-8 minutes to maintain temporal balance within the session.

Combined Sensory and Motor Exercise Group

The Sensory Exercise Group (SEG) participated in an intervention designed to enhance sensory awareness and integration. The protocol included tactile stimuli such as sand, sensory balls, fabrics with different textures, multisensory gels, brushing, vibration, and superficial massage to stimulate cutaneous receptors and enrich sensory input. Massage was applied with the participant in a supine position, elbows extended, and hands in a neutral position. All sessions were standardized using a digital stopwatch, and each intervention lasted approximately 15 minutes with equal time allocation across groups. This standardized timing ensured that observed effects were related to the intervention content rather than differences in exposure duration.

Sensory Exercise Group

The Motor Exercise Group (MEG) performed structured hand exercises including active range of motion exercises for the wrist and fingers, grip strengthening, stabilization exercises, and wrist flexion-extension exercises using elastic bands and dumbbells. Resistance levels were adjusted according to participant tolerance, and the protocol was applied only to the dominant side. Each exercise consisted of 5-7 repetitions and two sets, with 30-second rest intervals between sets.

Motor Exercise Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Having the ability to verbally communicate to answer questions
  • Willingness to participate in the study
  • Having read and signed the informed consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Having joint movement restriction in the upper extremity
  • Presence of skin injury or scarring on the hand or wrist
  • History of surgery on the upper extremity
  • Having an orthopedic problem in the upper extremity
  • Having a rheumatic disease
  • Having a neurological condition in the upper extremity
  • Having a severe mental or cognitive impairment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul Atlas University

Kâğıthane, Istanbul, 34408, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesBehavior

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2026

First Posted

May 15, 2026

Study Start

March 6, 2026

Primary Completion

April 25, 2026

Study Completion

May 1, 2026

Last Updated

May 18, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations