Effectiveness of Audio-Tactile Performance Technique With Sing-Along Lyrics on Oral Hygiene Instruction to Visually Impaired Individuals: A Matched-Pair Randomized Study
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this match-pair randomized study is to compare the effectiveness of the standard Audio-Tactile Performance (ATP) technique with a song-based adaptation (ATP/S) in teaching oral hygiene in visually impaired individuals aged 6 to 20 years in Kathmandu, Nepal.
- 1.Can the ATP/S approach achieve a greater improvement in plaque control, as measured by the Patient Hygiene Performance (PHP) index, compared to standard ATP instruction over a two-week period?
- 2.Does the rhythmic structure of a song lead to a more continuous improvement in toothbrushing task performance and theoretical oral health knowledge?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 9, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 13, 2026
CompletedMay 13, 2026
January 1, 2025
2 months
May 7, 2026
May 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
tooth brushing task analysis
The oral cavity is divided into 16 surface areas. Scoring Criteria: For each area, participants are scored on four specific criteria: 1. Maintaining a 45-degree angle of the bristles. 2. Using an appropriate back-and-forth vibrating motion. 3. Ensuring adequate surface coverage. 4. Brushing for at least 5 seconds per surface. Calculation: Each correctly executed criterion earns 1 point, and the total skill level is determined by the percentage of points achieved out of the total possible points.
from baseline to intervention, reinforment (1 week) & Final data collection (end of 2 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient hygiene performance (PHP score)
from baseline to intervention, reinforment (1 week) & Final data collection (end of 2 weeks)
Other Outcomes (1)
Oral Health Knowledge Questionnaire
from baseline, intervention, reinforcement (1 week) and final data collection (end of 2 week)
Study Arms (2)
ATP with audio information file
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm receive Oral Hygiene Instruction (OHI) using the standard Audio-Tactile Performance (ATP) technique. This involves hands-on training with a tooth model (dentoform) paired with a pre-recorded audio information file that provides verbal instructions on brushing techniques.
ATP with informational song
EXPERIMENTALGroup B (Intervention Group): Participants in this arm receive OHI using the ATP technique enhanced with a sing-along song. This method utilizes the same hands-on training with a tooth model but replaces the standard audio file with a culturally adapted song containing the brushing instructions, leveraging rhythmic entrainment to aid memory and coordination.
Interventions
ATP with informational song used to provide guidance to the participants
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Bilateral visually impaired in age 6-20yrs. (as verified in school medical record)
You may not qualify if:
- Visual impairment associated with any disabilities that affected arm motor skill/loss of upper dexterous extremity/abnormal mental development/deaf.
- Using any chemical plaque control agent.
- Individuals with calculus on examining teeth
- On medications that could affect the gingival status.
- Inability to brush due to pain from severe caries/oro-mucosal conditions.
- Have less than 4 teeth in each quadrant.
- Presented with orthodontic or prosthodontic appliance.
- Subject with good oral hygiene ; plaque score = 0
- Un co-operative children.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Laboratory boarding Secondary school
Ki̇̄rtipur, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal
Namuna Macchindra secondary school
Lalitpur, Lagankhel, 44600, Nepal
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
woranun Prapansilp, Masters pediatric dentistry
Mahidol University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Dental Examiners: Two dental examiners were blinded to the group assignments (Control vs. Intervention). This was critical to ensure that the measurement of PHP scores, the evaluation of toothbrushing task analysis steps and the oral health knowledge were not influenced by whether the student used the standard audio or the song. two schools were randomly allocated in un-named envelop and picked on the day of intervention
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principle investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2026
First Posted
May 13, 2026
Study Start
June 9, 2025
Primary Completion
August 22, 2025
Study Completion
October 30, 2025
Last Updated
May 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share