NCT07580066

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a non-invasive brain stimulation method called continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) can improve attention in adults who have hemispatial neglect after stroke. Hemispatial neglect is a common consequence of stroke where a person fails to notice things on one side of their environment and body after brain damage despite having intact sensory organs. Current treatments include physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and visual scanning training. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does cTBS applied to the cerebellum shift spatial attention toward the neglected side, as measured by eye movements during a visual exploration task?
  • Does cTBS change brain activity patterns linked to attention networks, as measured by EEG? Researchers will compare different conditions, cerebellar cTBS, cerebral cTBS and sham cTBS to see which approach best improves visuospatial attention. Sham cTBS looks and feels identical to real stimulation but does not deliver effective magnetic pulses. Participants, who are already admitted to the neurology and neurorehabilitation ward, will attend four study visits over approximately two weeks, each lasting about one hour. They receive active or sham cTBS at three stimulation sessions, each separated by at least 48 hours. They also have their eye movements recorded using a camera-based eye-tracking system before and after each session and have their brain activity recorded using EEG, a method that measures electrical activity through small electrodes on the scalp. Participation is voluntary. Participants may withdraw at any time without any impact on their regular medical care. The study is conducted at the Neurocenter of Luzerner Kantonsspital, Switzerland, and is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF).

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
45mo left

Started May 2026

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress6%
May 2026Apr 2030

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 30, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 5, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 12, 2026

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2030

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2030

Last Updated

May 12, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

April 30, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 6, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

NeglectStrokecTMSCerebellum

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mean Gaze Position (MGP) during Free Visual Exploration (FVE)

    MGP reflects the mean horizontal position (x-axis) of all fixations during free viewing of 24 naturalistic images. Recorded using an infrared video-based eye tracking system (EyeLink 1000 Plus; 1000 Hz). A MGP of 0 indicates centered fixation distribution; positive values indicate a rightward bias; negative values indicate a leftward shift. Fixations of 100-2000 ms are included. Assessed immediately before and after each cTBS session.

    pre-intervention and immediatly after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Electroencephalography (EEG)

    pre-intervention and immediatly after intervention

  • MRI-based structural brain connectivity and lesion mapping

    once at baseline

  • Additional Free Visual Exploration (FVE) variables

    pre-intervention and immediatly after intervention

Study Arms (3)

WP1: cTBS over left PIC. WP2: cTBS over left PPC and then over left PIC

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Continuous theta burst stimulation

WP1: cTBS over the left PPC. WP2: cTBS over left PIC and then over left PPC

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: Continuous theta burst stimulation

WP1: sham cTBS over left PIC. WP2: cTBS over left PPC and then sham cTBS over left PIC

SHAM COMPARATOR
Device: Continuous theta burst stimulationDevice: Sham continuous theta burst stimulation

Interventions

cTBS delivered using a MagPro X100 stimulator with a round coil (MC-125, outer radius 60 mm). Protocol: 801 pulses in 267 bursts (3 pulses at 30 Hz, repeated at 6 Hz). Two trains applied with a 15-minute interval. Targets: left posterior inferior cerebellum (PIC; lobules VI-VIII) and left posterior parietal cortex (PPC), localized by MRI-based neuronavigation (BrainSight). Applied at 100% of individual resting motor threshold.

WP1: cTBS over left PIC. WP2: cTBS over left PPC and then over left PICWP1: cTBS over the left PPC. WP2: cTBS over left PIC and then over left PPCWP1: sham cTBS over left PIC. WP2: cTBS over left PPC and then sham cTBS over left PIC

Sham stimulation delivered using the same MagPro X100 stimulator with a sham coil (MC-P-B70), which produces identical acoustic and tactile sensations as the active coil without delivering effective magnetic stimulation. Same protocol and positioning procedure as active cTBS.

WP1: sham cTBS over left PIC. WP2: cTBS over left PPC and then sham cTBS over left PIC

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • First-ever, subacute right hemispheric stroke
  • Left-sided visual neglect defined by MGP \> 1.333°
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity
  • MRI compatibility (MRI-based neuronavigation for cTBS)
  • Capacity to consent and ability to follow study procedures

You may not qualify if:

  • Cerebellar lesion
  • History of epilepsy
  • Metallic implants in the head region
  • Scalp or skin conditions that interfere with EEG electrode placement (e.g. open wounds, infections, severe psoriasis)
  • Co-morbidities including: neurological, degenerative or major psychiatric disorder (other than index stroke), alcohol or drug abuse, severe liver or kidney disease, and active malignant tumor disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Enrolment in an ongoing clinical trial

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Klinik für Neurologie und Neurorehabilitation

Lucerne, Canton of Lucerne, 6004, Switzerland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Perceptual DisordersStroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Thomas Nyffeler, Prof. Dr. med.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: randomized, sham-controlled, single-blinded crossover design
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2026

First Posted

May 12, 2026

Study Start

May 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2030

Last Updated

May 12, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations