Comparative Effects of Kendall and Feldenkrais Exercise in Upper Crossed Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Upper Cross Syndrome (UCS) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder characterized by muscular imbalances and postural dysfunction. Kendall Method and Feldenkrais Method are physiotherapy exercise programs aimed at reducing pain and improving cervical position sense, CV angle and function. This study compares their effects on pain, CV angle, cervical position sense, and disability in individuals with upper cross syndrome. This will be a randomized Controlled trial conducted on 72 participants. Data will be collected from Sikander Medical Complex, Gujranwala by using non-probability convenience sampling technique. Adults aged 20 to 50 years with upper cross syndrome, confirmed by Craniovertebral Angle less than 50 degrees and experiencing symptoms for more than four weeks, will be included in this study. Individuals with cervical spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, disc prolapse, trauma-related cervical injuries, or a history of shoulder surgery will be excluded. Group A will receive Kendall Method along with conservative physiotherapy, while Group B will receive Feldenkrais Method combined with conservative physiotherapy. Each session will last 30 minutes-40 minutes for the primary intervention and 15-20 minutes for conventional therapy-administered three times per week for five weeks. Pre- and post-treatment evaluations will include the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), CV angle (measured via Image J), Cervical position Sense (assessed via HRE) and functional disability (measured via NDI). Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 27.0.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2026
ExpectedMay 11, 2026
May 1, 2026
4 months
May 5, 2026
May 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Neck pain and diability index
The NDI is used to measure functional impairment and pain because to its high reliability and validity. A higher NDI score indicates a more severe impairment; the ten parts of the NDI are rated from zero to fifty. With a maximum score of 50, each item may be assessed on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 5 (total impairment). The maximum possible score for each part is 5. If the first statement is marked as true, the section score is 0, and if the final statement is recorded as true, the score is 5. No neck impairment is considered to exist with a score of 0 4, mild disability from 5-14, moderate disability from 15-24, severe disability from 25-34, and full disability from scores over 34(11). The Neck Disability Index exhibited excellent reliability (ICC = 0.92; \[95 % CI: 0.46-0.97\]).(27)
6th week
Head Repositioning Error Test
The Arc tangent of the distance between the reference and target points divided by the distance between reference point and the laser pointer was considered as HRE.This method was first described by Revel et al. Each participant performed three trials. The average amount of three HRE was used for data analysis. No discomfort or complication was reported by participants after HRE test. The CVA and HRE were measured by two different physiotherapists.(29)
6th week
Study Arms (2)
Kendall Exercise Method (KM)
EXPERIMENTALFeldenkrais Exercise Method (FM)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Strengthening of deep cervical flexors Procedure: Positioning supine with the chin tucked in and lifting the head for 2 to 8 s. Stretching of cervical extensors Procedure: Maintaining a sitting posture, with hands on the occipital region, and flexed spine while moving head downwards to stretch cervical extensors. Strengthening of retractors Procedure: Maintaining an upright posture, keep the resistance band circling with strong support and stretching it with the upper limbs of both sides so that there is full retraction of the scapula
Shoulder 1 minute (2) Relaxation (2) Lift and lower one shoulder slowly Key Focus Focus on small range of motion and awareness Neck Rolls head from one side to the other gently 1 minute Reduce tension, no strain, smooth motion Ear-to-Shoulder (Static) Lower ear to shoulder, return to center 1 minute Observe full-body involvement Ear-to-Shoulder with Shoulder Lift Alternate ear-to-shoulder and shoulder-to-ear 1 minute Gentle coordination of \]head and shoulder Upper Body Rotation (Step 1) Sit forward on chair; rotate upper body right slightly 6-10 Reps Relaxed turning, observe visual range Eyes Fixed with Body Rotation Fix eyes forward, turn upper body right 6-10 Reps Notice effect of eye fixation on motion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male subjects between 20-50 years
- Female subjects between 20-50 years
- Cranio-vertebral angle less than 50 degrees
- Subjects who had been experiencing neck pain for more than 3 months
- Slouched sitting for more than four hours per day
- Usage of handheld devices while reading, working, and travelling
- Pain intensity score between 4 to 10 on NPRS
- NDI\>10 scores between 10 and 34
- Tight pectoralis major muscle
You may not qualify if:
- Surgeries of the cervical spine within past 1 year
- Surgeries or fracture to the shoulder joint
- Cervical instability
- Cervical Radiculopathy
- Neurological disorders such as cervical spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, disc prolapse and rheumatic disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rabiya Noor
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aiman Hameed, MSPT(CP)
Riphah International University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2026
First Posted
May 11, 2026
Study Start
January 15, 2026
Primary Completion
May 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 15, 2026
Last Updated
May 11, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share