Clinical Effectiveness of Robot-assisted Gait Training in Patients With Lower Limb Burns Accompanied by Fractures: Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Gait dysfunction, common in patients with lower limb burns accompanied by fractures, requires acute rehabilitation. This study investigated the clinical effects of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) on gait function in patients with lower limb burns accompanied by fractures. In this preliminary study, RAGT will be conducted using an end-effector-type gait-training robot. Participants will receive 60 min of gait training daily (30 min of conventional gait training and 30 min of RAGT) for 8 weeks. We plan to conduct clinical evaluations related to gait function of the participants included in the preliminary study before training and after 8 weeks of training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 25, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2026
May 11, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.7 years
May 5, 2026
May 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
functional ambulatory category
Ambulatory ability was assessed using the FAC scale. Participants were rated on a six-point scale based on the level of physical assistance required for walking, regardless of whether an assistive device was used.
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
manual muscle test, MMT
8 weeks
active range of motion (AROM) of the lower limbs
8 weeks
pain score (visual analog scale, VAS)
8 weeks
6-minute walking test (6 MWT)
8 weeks
Study Arms (1)
robot assited gait training
OTHERAll participants underwent 60 min of daily gait training consisting of 30 min of conventional physical therapy in the morning and 30 min of RAGT in the afternoon. All participants underwent 40 gait training sessions over 8 weeks, five times per week. Conventional physical training consisted of ROM exercises and strength training for the lower limbs and ground gait training once weight bearing was possible.
Interventions
All participants underwent 60 min of daily gait training consisting of 30 min of conventional physical therapy in the morning and 30 min of RAGT in the afternoon. All participants underwent 40 gait training sessions over 8 weeks, five times per week. Conventional physical training consisted of ROM exercises and strength training for the lower limbs and ground gait training once weight bearing was possible.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged 19 years or older
- admitted to the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine after the wound had epithelialized following wound treatment via skin grafting or aseptic dressing procedures
- underwent fixation or brace treatment after a lower limb fracture was diagnosed via imaging at the time of injury
- sufficient cognitive function to follow the therapist's instructions during training
- a functional ambulatory category (FAC) of 1 or higher and 3 or lower.
You may not qualify if:
- unable to bear weight owing to fracture union failure or complications such as osteomyelitis
- severe pain rendering the patient unable to wear the robotic device
- scars that may bleed or become infected when wearing the robotic device
- a history of lower limb weakness or reduced gait ability due to other causes prior to injury
- lower limb sensory disturbances caused by peripheral neuropathic diseases such as diabetes
- height less than 120 cm or body mass more than 120 kg
- withdrawal of consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital
Seoul, 07247, South Korea
Related Publications (2)
Franks PW, Bryan GM, Martin RM, Reyes R, Lakmazaheri AC, Collins SH. Comparing optimized exoskeleton assistance of the hip, knee, and ankle in single and multi-joint configurations. Wearable Technol. 2021 Nov 24;2:e16. doi: 10.1017/wtc.2021.14. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 38486633RESULTIziumov A, Hussein TS, Kosenko E, Nazarov A. Adaptive Exoskeleton Device for Stress Reduction in the Ankle Joint Orthosis. Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jan 30;25(3):832. doi: 10.3390/s25030832.
PMID: 39943472RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Outcome measurements and data analyses were conducted by trained, blinded assessors who were not involved in the training.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2026
First Posted
May 11, 2026
Study Start
April 15, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 25, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Last Updated
May 11, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
We plan to disclose it upon a legitimate request from the corresponding author.