NCT04281394

Brief Summary

Gait enables individuals to move forward and is considered a natural skill. However, gait disturbances are very common in patients with burn injury. Major causes of functional impairment are pain and joint contractures. Recent studies focused on the application of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT). This study aimed to elucidate the efficacy and investigate the mechanism of motor recovery after RAGT on patients with lower extremity burn.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
28

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 22, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 25, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 24, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 24, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 24, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

February 26, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

October 22, 2019

Last Update Submit

February 24, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

burnsrehabilitationrobot assisted gait training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • the changes of functional ambulatory category

    Scale 0 means that the patient cannot walk or can only walk with assistance of two people. Scale 5 means that the patient can walk independently. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    baseline, and after 12 weeks intervention

  • the changes of 6 minutes walking test

    6MWT was performed in accordance with standardized guidelines, and the walking course was 20 m. Patients were instructed to walk as far as possible in 6 min. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    baseline, and after 12 weeks intervention

  • the changes of visual analogue scale

    Visual analogue scale was used to rate the degree of subjective pain during gait movement: 0 points were assigned when no pain was noted, and unbearable pain was assigned 10 points. higher scores mean a worse outcome

    baseline, and after 12 weeks intervention

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • the changes of active range of motion of flexion and extension

    baseline, and after 12 weeks intervention

  • the changes of active range of motion of flexion and extension

    baseline, and after 12 weeks intervention

  • the changes of active range of motion of dorsiflexion and plantarflexion

    baseline, and after 12 weeks intervention

  • the changes of isometric forces of knee flexion and knee extension

    baseline, and after 12 weeks intervention

  • the changes of isometric forces of ankle dorsiflexion and ankle plantarflexion

    baseline, and after 12 weeks intervention

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Robot assisted gait training

EXPERIMENTAL

Robot assisted gait training(RAGT) group received RAGT 5 sessions per week at duration 30 minutes with 30 minutes conventional physical therapy in 12 weeks. SUBAR® (CRETEM, Korea) is a wearable robot with a footplate that assists patients to perform voluntary muscle movements.

Device: Robot assisted gait training

conventional physical training group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The conventional group underwent conventional physical therapy( even level gait training and range of motion exercises) twice a day, 5 times a week in 12 weeks.

Other: conventional gait training

Interventions

SUBAR® (CRETEM, Korea) is a wearable robot with a footplate that assists patients to perform voluntary muscle movements. RAGT group received RAGT 5 sessions per week at duration 30 minutes with 30 minutes conventional physical therapy in 12 weeks.

Robot assisted gait training

even level gait training and range of motion exercises

conventional physical training group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients with full or virtually full thickness involvement of \>50% on the body surface area of the lower extremity
  • age \> 18 years
  • with ≤1 functional ambulation category (FAC) score ≤ 3

You may not qualify if:

  • patients with cognitive disorders before burn
  • serious cardiac dysfunction
  • problems with weight bearing due to unstable fractures
  • body weight ≥100 kg
  • severe fixed contracture
  • skin disorders that could be worsened by RAGT and conventional rehabilitation
  • patients with severe pain who were unable to undergo conventional rehabilitation programs.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital

Seoul, Yeong-deungpo-Dong, 150-719, South Korea

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Goto K, Morishita T, Kamada S, Saita K, Fukuda H, Shiota E, Sankai Y, Inoue T. Feasibility of rehabilitation using the single-joint hybrid assistive limb to facilitate early recovery following total knee arthroplasty: A pilot study. Assist Technol. 2017 Winter;29(4):197-201. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2016.1219883. Epub 2016 Aug 10.

    PMID: 27689789BACKGROUND
  • Kang MG, Yun SJ, Shin HI, Kim E, Lee HH, Oh BM, Seo HG. Effects of robot-assisted gait training in patients with Parkinson's disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Jan 7;20(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3123-4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

BurnsGait Disorders, Neurologic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and InjuriesNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: patients with full or virtually full thickness involvement of \>50% on the body surface area of the lower extremity
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2019

First Posted

February 24, 2020

Study Start

October 25, 2019

Primary Completion

February 24, 2020

Study Completion

February 24, 2020

Last Updated

February 26, 2020

Record last verified: 2019-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations