Clinical Trial Study on the Improved New Method of Acupotomy for AS
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study employs a randomized controlled trial methodology to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified acupotomy technique in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Through ultrasound-guided localization, the operative sites are assessed to clarify the improvement effect of the modified acupotomy on disease activity in AS patients. The aim is to enhance the clinical outcomes of AS, provide evidence-based medical support for acupotomy treatment of AS, and improve the diagnosis and treatment standards for the condition.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2029
May 13, 2026
May 1, 2026
2.6 years
May 5, 2026
May 11, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index
Based on the patient's symptoms over the past week, an assessment is conducted through six questions. The first five questions are scored using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-10 points). The calculation formula is generally expressed as: BASDAI = 0.2 × (A + B + C + D + (E + F)/2) Where: A represents the degree of fatigue/tiredness; B represents the degree of pain in the neck, back, or hips; C represents the degree of pain/swelling in other joints; D represents the level of discomfort from bodily tenderness or pressure pain; E represents the severity of morning stiffness; F represents the duration of morning stiffness (converted to a 0-10 score). BASDAI ≥4 indicates high disease activity, while a score \<4 suggests lower disease activity.
Week 0,Week 4
Secondary Outcomes (7)
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index
Week 0,Week 2,Week 8
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index
Week 0,Week 2,Week 4,Week 8
Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein
Week 0,Week 2,Week 4,Week 8
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index
Week 0,Week 2,Week 4,Week 8
The Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Scale
Week 0,Week 2,Week 4,Week 8
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
the acupotomy intervention group
EXPERIMENTALAll subjects were enrolled at week 0 and, after completing baseline assessments, received acupotomy treatment once per week for a total of four sessions over the initial three-week period. The core intervention for theacupotomy intervention group involved ultrasound-guided precise release: first, the target vertebra with the most significant lesions was identified through palpation and ultrasound imaging, after which the acupotomy was accurately guided in real-time via ultrasound to the interspinous points (located at the interspinous ligaments) and paraspinal points (located at the intertransverse ligaments) of the target vertebra and adjacent vertebrae for release.
the sham acupotomy intervention group
SHAM COMPARATORThe sham acupotomy intervention group strictly replicated all preliminary procedures of the treatment group, including exploration, ultrasound localization, and local anesthesia. However, the acupotomy needle only pierced the epidermis without performing any release operations in the deeper tissues, thereby maintaining blinding and assessing the specific effect of the acupotomy therapy.
Interventions
All subjects were enrolled at week 0 and, after completing baseline assessments, received acupotomy treatment once per week for a total of four sessions over the initial three-week period. The core intervention for the treatment group (acupotomy group) involved ultrasound-guided precise release: first, the target vertebra with the most significant lesions was identified through palpation and ultrasound imaging, after which the acupotomy was accurately guided in real-time via ultrasound to the interspinous points (located at the interspinous ligaments) and paraspinal points (located at the intertransverse ligaments) of the target vertebra and adjacent vertebrae for release.
The control group (sham acupotomy group) strictly replicated all preliminary procedures of the treatment group, including exploration, ultrasound localization, and local anesthesia. However, the acupotomy needle only pierced the epidermis without performing any release operations in the deeper tissues, thereby maintaining blinding and assessing the specific effect of the acupotomy therapy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Meeting the 1984 revised New York criteria or the 2009 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis
- Age 18-75 years
- BASDAI ≥4
- Signed informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of autoimmune diseases other than the studied condition
- Complete spinal ankylosis or spinal deformity
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Comorbid severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases, hepatic or renal failure, malignant tumors, or coagulation disorders
- Patients unable to comply with data collection due to mental, linguistic, or similar factors
- Patients with psoriatic arthritis, reactive arthritis, or inflammatory bowel disease-associated spondyloarthritis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine
Henan, Zhengzhou, 450002, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2026
First Posted
May 11, 2026
Study Start
December 2, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2029
Last Updated
May 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share