Infusion of Furosemide to Improve Diuretic Efficiency in Acute Heart Failure
INFUSE-AHF
2 other identifiers
interventional
436
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Acute heart failure is a condition where the heart suddenly cannot pump blood well enough for the body's needs. Many people admitted to the hospital with acute heart failure have too much fluid in the body. This can cause shortness of breath, swelling, and the need for treatment with water-removing medicine. Furosemide is a commonly used water-removing medicine that is given into a vein to treat fluid overload. It can be given in different ways. One way is as a continuous infusion, where the medicine is given slowly over time through a pump. Another way is as repeated injections given several times a day. It is not known whether one of these ways is better than the other for removing excess fluid in people with acute heart failure. The purpose of this study is to compare two ways of giving furosemide into a vein: Continuous infusion started with an initial extra dose, and bolus injections given three times a day. About 436 adults admitted to hospitals in Denmark with acute heart failure and fluid overload will take part. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. This means that chance will decide which treatment method each participant receives. The main thing the researchers will measure is how much body weight participants lose about 3 days after randomization. Weight loss is used as a measure of how much excess fluid has been removed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started May 2026
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2027
May 11, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.3 years
April 28, 2026
May 5, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Net weight loss 3 days after randomization
Net change in body weight from randomization to the morning of Day 4, corresponding to approximately 72 hours after randomization.
From randomization to approximately 72 hours
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Net weight loss 2 days after randomization
From randomization to approximately 48 hours
Change in dyspnea 3 days after randomization
From randomization to approximately 72 hours
Days alive out of hospital to Day 30
From randomization to 30 days
Length of hospital stay
From randomization up to 30 days
Other Outcomes (8)
Net weight loss 1 day after randomization
From randomization to approximately 24 hours
Change in dyspnea 1 day after randomization
From randomization to approximately 24 hours
Change in dyspnea 2 days after randomization
From randomization to approximately 48 hours
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Continuous infusion preceded by a loading dose
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive intravenous furosemide administered as a continuous infusion preceded by an initial loading dose. The loading dose is administered immediately before initiation of the infusion. Daily intravenous furosemide doses are determined according to the participant's oral loop diuretic dose at hospital admission using a predefined dosing algorithm.
Bolus injections three times a day
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive intravenous furosemide administered as bolus injections three times a day. The first bolus injection includes an additional dose to mirror the loading dose strategy used in the continuous infusion group. Daily intravenous furosemide doses are determined according to the participant's oral loop diuretic dose at hospital admission using a predefined dosing algorithm.
Interventions
Intravenous furosemide administered as a continuous infusion preceded by a loading dose. Daily intravenous furosemide doses are determined according to the participant's oral loop diuretic dose at hospital admission using a predefined dosing algorithm.
Intravenous furosemide administered as bolus injections three times a day. The first bolus injection includes an additional dose to mirror the loading dose strategy used in the continuous infusion group. Daily intravenous furosemide doses are determined according to the participant's oral loop diuretic dose at hospital admission using a predefined dosing algorithm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure with volume overload
- At least 1 sign of volume overload
- Anticipated intravenous furosemide treatment for at least 3 days
- Age 18 years or older
You may not qualify if:
- Shock
- Patient requiring treatment with inotropes or vasopressors
- Current or planned use of renal replacement therapy or ultrafiltration
- Patient with a renal transplant
- Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding
- Severe hypokalaemia, defined as potassium less than 2.5 mmol/L, or severe hyponatremia, defined as sodium less than 125 mmol/L
- Allergy to furosemide and its components
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Aarhuslead
- Central Denmark Regioncollaborator
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Esben Merrild, MD
Department of Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Bo Løfgren, MD PhD
Department of Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Henrik Birn, MD PhD DMSc
Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Kasper G Lauridsen, MD PhD
Department of Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Christian B Poulsen, MD PhD
Private Organization
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- This is an open-label trial. Participants, care providers, investigators, and outcome assessors are not masked to treatment allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2026
First Posted
May 11, 2026
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2027
Last Updated
May 11, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- After publication of the main trial results. Data will be considered available on a case-by-case basis, and there is no predefined end date for availability.
- Access Criteria
- Requests must be submitted to the Scientific Lead or Coordinating Investigator and will be evaluated by the Steering Committee. Access may be granted for scientifically sound research proposals that do not conflict with ongoing or planned analyses, intellectual property considerations, or the governance and objectives of the trial. Requests will be evaluated based on methodological quality, feasibility, and compatibility with the scientific, ethical, and strategic framework of the trial.
De-identified individual participant data may be made available after publication of the main trial results, subject to approval by the Steering Committee and in accordance with applicable data protection legislation. All trial data will be pseudo-anonymized and stored for 25 years after the end of the trial in accordance with Danish law and GDPR requirements. Data sharing will be considered on a case-by-case basis for scientifically sound research proposals that do not conflict with ongoing or planned analyses, intellectual property considerations, or the governance and objectives of the trial. Requests for data access must be submitted to the Scientific Lead or Coordinating Investigator and will be evaluated by the Steering Committee based on methodological quality, feasibility, and compatibility with the scientific, ethical, and strategic framework of the trial. There is no obligation for unrestricted, automatic, or indefinite data sharing.