Hydrodissection With Neuroprolotherapy Versus Open Release for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
HN-CTS
Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodissection Combined With Neuroprolotherapy Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Non-Inferiority Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial designed to compare ultrasound-guided hydrodissection combined with neuroprolotherapy versus open carpal tunnel release in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated sequence, with allocation concealment ensured by sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis will be performed by blinded evaluators. The experimental group will undergo a single session of ultrasound-guided hydrodissection with perineural injection of a solution composed of zero point nine percent sodium chloride and five percent dextrose, combined with local anesthetic and betamethasone, aiming to promote mechanical release of the median nerve and modulation of the inflammatory process. The control group will undergo standard open carpal tunnel release through surgical division of the transverse carpal ligament under sterile conditions. Participants will be assessed at baseline, and at 1, 3, and 6 months after intervention. The primary outcome is the change in the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score at 3 months. A non-inferiority margin of 0.5 points will be adopted. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity measured by visual analog scale, grip strength, pinch strength, median nerve cross-sectional area assessed by ultrasound, time to return to work, and procedure-related complications. Statistical analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle, with complementary per-protocol analysis. Between-group comparisons will be conducted using analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline values, and repeated measures will be analyzed using mixed-effects models. The hypothesis is that the minimally invasive intervention is non-inferior to surgical decompression, with potential advantages in recovery and morbidity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 4, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 2, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2027
May 8, 2026
May 1, 2026
4 months
May 4, 2026
May 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score
Change from baseline in the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire total score at 3 months. The primary analysis will assess the between-group difference using a non-inferiority framework with a predefined margin of 0.5 points. Lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Baseline to 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale)
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months
Change in grip strength
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Hydrodissection + Neuroprolotherapy
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will undergo a single session of ultrasound-guided hydrodissection combined with neuroprolotherapy. The procedure will be performed under sterile conditions with real-time ultrasound guidance, with needle placement adjacent to the median nerve at the level of the carpal tunnel, followed by perineural injection of a solution composed of zero point nine percent sodium chloride and five percent dextrose, combined with local anesthetic and betamethasone, with a total volume of ten milliliters, aiming to achieve mechanical nerve release and inflammatory modulation.
Open Carpal Tunnel Release
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will undergo open carpal tunnel release performed under sterile conditions in an operating room, using local or regional anesthesia, through a longitudinal palmar incision with division of the transverse carpal ligament to decompress the median nerve, followed by hemostasis, layered closure, and compressive dressing.
Interventions
Ultrasound-guided perineural injection using saline and dextrose solution combined with local anesthetic and betamethasone for mechanical release of the median nerve.
Participants will undergo open carpal tunnel release performed under sterile conditions in an operating room, using local or regional anesthesia, through a longitudinal palmar incision with division of the transverse carpal ligament to decompress the median nerve, followed by hemostasis, layered closure, and compressive dressing.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 years or olde
- Clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome
- Presence of symptoms for at least 3 months
- Failure of conservative treatment, including splinting, medication, or physical therapy
- Ability to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Previous carpal tunnel surgery in the affected limb
- Severe thenar muscle atrophy
- Cervical radiculopathy or proximal nerve compression
- Pregnancy
- Coagulopathy or current use of anticoagulants contraindicating procedures
- Local infection at the intervention site
- Inability to comply with follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Recife, Pernambuco, 50.670-901, Brazil
Related Publications (4)
Wu YT, Ho TY, Chou YC, Ke MJ, Li TY, Tsai CK, Chen LC. Six-month Efficacy of Perineural Dextrose for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Aug;92(8):1179-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.025.
PMID: 28778254RESULTPadua L, Coraci D, Erra C, Pazzaglia C, Paolasso I, Loreti C, Caliandro P, Hobson-Webb LD. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Nov;15(12):1273-1284. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30231-9. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
PMID: 27751557RESULTKeith MW, Masear V, Chung K, Maupin K, Andary M, Amadio PC, Barth RW, Watters WC 3rd, Goldberg MJ, Haralson RH 3rd, Turkelson CM, Wies JL. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Jun;17(6):389-96. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200906000-00007.
PMID: 19474448RESULTLevine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, Katz JN. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Nov;75(11):1585-92. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199311000-00002.
PMID: 8245050RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Giselly V de Miranda, MD
Hospital das Clínicas - Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE/EBSERH)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome assessors and the statistician will be blinded to group allocation. Participants and treating surgeons cannot be blinded due to the nature of the interventions.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2026
First Posted
May 8, 2026
Study Start
May 2, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 2, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2027
Last Updated
May 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share