High-Intensity Laser Therapy in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Clinical, Sonographic, and Electrophysiological Outcomes
Evaluation of the Clinical, Sonographic, and Electrophysiological Efficacy of High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper extremity and is characterized by pain, paresthesia, and functional impairment resulting from increased pressure within the carpal tunnel. Although conservative treatment approaches such as splinting and pharmacological therapy are commonly used, High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) has emerged as a non-invasive modality with potential analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and biostimulatory effects. However, evidence regarding its efficacy remains limited, particularly from sham-controlled studies incorporating objective outcome measures. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the clinical, sonographic, and electrophysiological effectiveness of HILT in patients with mild-to-moderate CTS. Eligible patients aged 18 to 65 years with electrophysiologically confirmed mild-to-moderate CTS will be randomized into two groups: a HILT group and a sham HILT group. Both groups will receive standard wrist splinting as part of conservative management. Clinical outcomes will be assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for pain, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores for symptom severity and functional status, and grip strength measurements. Objective evaluations will include median nerve sensory and motor nerve conduction studies and ultrasonographic measurement of the median nerve cross-sectional area at the proximal carpal tunnel level. Assessments will be performed at baseline and at 1 and 3 months after treatment. This study aims to provide robust and objective evidence regarding the therapeutic effectiveness of HILT in the conservative management of carpal tunnel syndrome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 5, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2026
CompletedFebruary 17, 2026
December 1, 2025
4 months
January 14, 2026
February 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain Severity assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Pain intensity will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This is a self-reported scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "severe pain". Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (greater pain intensity).
At baseline (pre-treatment), and at 1 and 3 months following the conclusion of the 2-week treatment period.
Symptom Severity and Functional Status assessed by Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ)
The BCTQ consists of two subscales: the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and the Functional Status Scale (FSS). The SSS has 11 items and the FSS has 8 items. Each item is scored on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "no symptoms/no difficulty" and 5 indicates "severe symptoms/cannot perform activity". The final score is calculated as the mean of the items. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (more severe symptoms and greater functional impairment).
At baseline (pre-treatment), and at 1 and 3 months following the conclusion of the 2-week treatment period.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Median Nerve Cross-Sectional Area(CSA)
At baseline (pre-treatment), and at 1 and 3 months following the conclusion of the 2-week treatment period
Hand Grip Strength
At baseline (pre-treatment), and at 1 and 3 months following the conclusion of the 2-week treatment period.
Pinch Strength (Lateral Pinch)
Time Frame: At baseline (pre-treatment), and at 1 and 3 months following the conclusion of the 2-week treatment period.
Median Nerve Motor Distal Latency (MDL)
At baseline (pre-treatment), and at 1 and 3 months following the conclusion of the 2-week treatment period.
Median Nerve Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) Amplitude
At baseline (pre-treatment), and at 1 and 3 months following the conclusion of the 2-week treatment period.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT)
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group will receive High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) in addition to using a neutral wrist splint. The treatment will consist of a total of 10 sessions, administered 5 days per week for a duration of 2 weeks.
Sham High-Intensity Laser Therapy
SHAM COMPARATORPatients in this group will receive sham (placebo) laser therapy in addition to using a neutral wrist splint. The treatment will consist of a total of 10 sessions, administered 5 days per week for a duration of 2 weeks.
Interventions
Procedure: The laser is applied to the carpal tunnel area while the patient's forearm is in supination. Device Specifications: Pulsed Nd:YAG laser source with Peak Power \>3000 W, Intensity (max) 15,000 W/cm², Frequency 10-30 Hz, Pulse duration ≤ 100 μs, and a spot size of 0.5 cm diameter (0.2 cm²). Treatment Protocol (3 Phases): 1. Initial Rapid Scan (3 Steps): Step 1: 25 Hz, 510 mJ/cm², 139 J energy. Step 2: 20 Hz, 610 mJ/cm², 139 J energy. Step 3: 19 Hz, 710 mJ/cm², 139 J energy. 2. Trigger Point Phase: Applied to painful points on the affected side. Step 1: 15 Hz, 360 mJ/cm², 6.3 J energy. Step 2: 15 Hz, 510 mJ/cm², 9 J energy. Step 3: 14 Hz, 610 mJ/cm², 10.1 J energy (applied for 6 seconds per point). 3. Final Slow Scan: Performed using the same parameters as the rapid scan phase. Total Energy: A total of 835 Joules is delivered per session.
The same HIRO TT device is used with the same positioning and duration as the experimental group. The device provides auditory and visual cues identical to the active treatment, but no laser energy is emitted to the tissue. Participants will also use a standard wrist splint.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 65 years
- Clinical symptoms consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome
- Electrophysiologically confirmed mild or moderate carpal tunnel syndrome
- Ability to comply with the study protocol and follow-up assessments
- Provided written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Severe carpal tunnel syndrome on electrophysiological examination
- Previous surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome
- Local causes of carpal tunnel syndrome (e.g., mass lesions, ganglion cysts, tumors)
- Systemic conditions associated with carpal tunnel syndrome (e.g., diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, pregnancy, acromegaly)
- History of corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome within the last 6 months
- Presence of polyneuropathy, radiculopathy, or other upper extremity peripheral nerve disorders
- Contraindications to electrophysiological testing or laser therapy
- Inability to complete follow-up assessments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
Ankara, Ankara, Çankaya, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Yigit F, Ordahan B. Effects of high-intensity laser therapy on pain, functional status, hand grip strength, and median nerve cross-sectional area by ultrasonography in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Oct 31;38(1):248. doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03913-z.
PMID: 37906312BACKGROUNDde la Barra Ortiz HA, Avila MA, Parizotto NA, Liebano RE. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Physiotherapy. 2025 Sep;128:101780. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2025.101780. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
PMID: 40121869BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Filiz Eser, professor
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2026
First Posted
February 17, 2026
Study Start
November 2, 2025
Primary Completion
March 5, 2026
Study Completion
April 30, 2026
Last Updated
February 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share