NCT07573813

Brief Summary

Background: The SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask is a novel video-assisted device that integrates the functions of both a dual-channel laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and an intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA). At present, there are relatively few studies on awake airway management for obese patients who undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask airway as an intubation conduit in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Patients and methods: This single-arm prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask airway in 57 morbidly obese patients (BMI ≥35 kg/m²) undergoing LSG.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
57

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2022

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 20, 2023

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 30, 2023

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 6, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 7, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

April 6, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 1, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Video laryngeal mask airwayMorbidly obese patientsAirway managementLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomyFirst-attempt success rate

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • the first-time success rate of intubation after insertion of SaCoVLM™

    Within 10 minutes following SaCoVLM™ placement

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Time to Successful SaCoVLM™ Insertion (seconds)

    From the start of device insertion into the mouth until the time of successful SaCoVLM™ placement with first confirmed ventilation, assessed up to 120 seconds. If insertion is not successful within 120 seconds, the event is censored at 120 seconds.

  • Number of SaCoVLM™ Insertion Attempts per Participant

    From the first insertion attempt until successful SaCoVLM™ placement is achieved or until the procedure is abandoned, assessed during the initial airway management procedure (up to 120 seconds or a maximum of 3 attempts, whichever comes first).

  • the SaCoVLM™ glottic exposure grades

    Immediately after SaCoVLM™ placement

  • Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP) (cm H₂O)

    Immediately after successful SaCoVLM™ insertion and before start of positive pressure ventilation (measured at a single time point: within 1 minute of confirmation of correct placement)

  • Proportion of Participants Requiring Any Airway Optimization Maneuver During SaCoVLM™ Placement

    During the initial airway management procedure, from the start of the first insertion attempt until successful ventilation is confirmed (assessed up to 120 seconds or a maximum of 3 attempts).

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

morbidly obese bariatric surgery

This study was a single-arm prospective study, so there was no grouping.

Device: SaCoVLM™ in Difficult Airways

Interventions

As part of the awake airway management protocol initiated in the operating room, patients were first instructed to hold 10 mL of dyclonine mucilage orally for approximately 10 minutes to achieve topical oropharyngeal anesthesia. This was followed by intravenous administration of midazolam 2 mg and atropine 0.4 mg, and bilateral ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block using 0.375% ropivacaine. A properly sized laryngeal mask was selected. The posterior surface of the cuff was lubricated with a water-based surgical lubricant. Under awake conditions, patients were instructed to open their mouths to facilitate SaCoVLM™ insertion. Optimal positioning was confirmed by visualization of complete glottic structures on the monitor screen. The glottic exposure grade was as we previously described . The cuff was inflated using a handheld manometer, and the mask was connected to the anesthesia machine. Clear glottic visualization on the monitor and the presence of a regular EtCO₂ waveform.

morbidly obese bariatric surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

The study population comprised adult patients aged over 18 years (with no upper age limit) diagnosed with morbid obesity.

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients aged over 18 years (no upper age limit)
  • Diagnosed with morbid obesity, clinically defined as either:
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m², or BMI ≥ 35 kg/m² accompanied by at least one significant obesity-related comorbidity

You may not qualify if:

  • Have no clinical indicators of anticipated difficult airway (Mallampati classification IV, thyromental distance \< 6 cm, mouth opening \< 3 cm, severe limited neck extension, or a history of difficult airway management)
  • Demonstrate tolerance for laparoscopic surgery and anesthesia
  • Be scheduled exclusively for LSG without concurrent additional procedures

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital

Jinan, Shandong, 250014, China

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Harjai M, Alam S, Rastogi S, Kumar S. Effectiveness and Validity of Preoperative Ultrasonographic Airway Assessment and Clinical Screening Tests to Predict Difficult Laryngoscopy: A Prospective, Observational Study. Cureus. 2023 Jul 15;15(7):e41933. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41933. eCollection 2023 Jul.

    PMID: 37583718BACKGROUND
  • Arterburn DE, Telem DA, Kushner RF, Courcoulas AP. Benefits and Risks of Bariatric Surgery in Adults: A Review. JAMA. 2020 Sep 1;324(9):879-887. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12567.

    PMID: 32870301BACKGROUND
  • Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, Rossing P, Tsapas A, Wexler DJ, Buse JB. Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2669-2701. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0033. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

    PMID: 30291106BACKGROUND
  • Wang Y, Zhao L, Gao L, Pan A, Xue H. Health policy and public health implications of obesity in China. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Jul;9(7):446-461. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00118-2. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Yongtao Sun

    Shandong First Medical University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Min Zhang

    Shandong First Medical University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Day
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Deputy Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2026

First Posted

May 7, 2026

Study Start

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion

May 20, 2023

Study Completion

May 30, 2023

Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

all IPD collected throughout the trial, only IPD used in the results publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
From May 2022 to May 2023, we included a total of 57 patients who were scheduled to undergo bariatric surgery.
Access Criteria
Who Qualified researchers from academic, non-profit, or commercial institutions with an approved research proposal; regulatory authorities; and direct collaborators. What Anonymized IPD, data dictionary, protocol, SAP, and ICF summary. No direct or indirect participant identifiers. How Submit proposal via online portal. Independent review committee approval. Sign data use agreement (non-identification, non-commercial, no third-party sharing). Access via secure virtual research environment or encrypted download; time-limited (e.g., 12 months); audit logs kept.

Locations