Study on the Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Severe Refractory Primary or Secondary RLS
REST-SCS
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Crossover Study on the Efficacy of Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Severe Refractory Primary or Secondary RLS: the REST-SCS Study
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
2
Brief Summary
A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Crossover Study to compare the short-efficacy of Burst-SCS with Sham Stimulation, in patients with severe to very severe RLS refractory or intolerant to standard available treatments and/or patients in augmentation, with a two-period-alternating treatment design.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 14, 2029
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 14, 2029
May 6, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.7 years
April 21, 2026
April 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
RLS symptom severity
Change in RLS symptoms and severity as measured by the International RLS-Rating-scale (IRLS-RS) score. The IRLS-RS is a self-administered 10-item questionnaire to assess the severity of sleep disruption and symptoms in RLS patients. It has been validated by the International RLS Study group. Each item is scored from 4 (very severe) to 0 (none). The final score ranges between 0 and 40 and classifies RLS as mild (1-10), moderate (11-20), severe (21-30) and very severe (31-40). A negative change will indicate an improvement in IRLS-RS score and, therefore, in the severity of sleep disruption and symptoms of RLS.
From baseline of the treatment phase to the end of the 2.5 months treatment phase
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Treatment response to SCS in %
From baseline of the treatment phase to end of the 2.5 months treatment phase
Change in general health quality of life
From baseline of the treatment period to the end of the 2.5 months treatment phase
Change in RLS-related quality of life
From baseline of the treatment period to the end of the 2.5 months treatment phase
Change of Total Sleep Time (TST), Sleep Latency (SL) and Sleep Efficacy (SE) acquired by actigraphy
From baseline of the treatment period to the end of the 1 month SCS stimulation during the cross-over of the treatment period
Change of PLMS Index recorded by PSG
From baseline of the treatment period to the end of the 1 month SCS stimulation during the cross-over of the treatment period
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Treatment phase: Sham-stimulation
PLACEBO COMPARATORAfter IPG implantation Burst-SCS is turned on in all participants for 2.5. Then, they will again be double-blind randomized to the 2 treatment orders for 2 weeks per stimulation mode (Sham stimulation or SCS) as fcollows: * Double-blind randomization to the following alternating treatment modes: * 14 days Sham-stimulation + 14 days SCS * 14 days SCS + 14r days Sham-stimulation
Treatment phase: SCS-stimulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter IPG implantation Burst-SCS is turned on in all participants for 2.5. Then, they will again be double-blind randomized to the 2 treatment orders for 2 weeks per stimulation mode (Sham stimulation or SCS) as fcollows: * Double-blind randomization to the following alternating treatment modes: * 14 days Sham-stimulation + 14 days SCS * 14 days SCS + 14r days Sham-stimulation
Interventions
Burst SCS, a specific spinal cord stimulation waveform that delivers pulses in clusters separated by brief periods without stimulation, is chosen over other modalities due to its demonstrated ability to modulate both the sensory and affective components of pain and discomfort. Unlike traditional tonic stimulation, Burst SCS delivers stimulation patterns that more closely resemble natural neuronal firing, and may provide effective symptom relief without inducing paresthesia.
For the Sham stimulation condition, the amplitude of the spinal cord stimulation will be set to zero.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female (all sexes) aged 18 years or older, inclusive;
- Diagnosis of primary or secondary RLS;
- Severe to very severe RLS defined as IRLS-RS score \> 20;
- Duration of RSL symptoms ≥ 6 months;
- Insufficient symptom control achieved by and/or intolerance to established mono- or combination therapy of standard pharmacological treatment incl. patients in augmentation;
- Stable pharmacologic therapy for RLS for at least 1 month;
- A stable pattern of neurological symptoms;
- Patients who are legally competent and able to understand the nature, scope and aim of the clinical trial;
- Signed informed subject consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to the materials of the device;
- Concomitant use of psychoactive-drugs (e.g. benzodiazepines, antidepressants; wash-out period: at least 7 days or longer depending on half-life);
- Co-morbid sleep disorders influencing sleep structure and nocturnal motor pattern (e.g. Narcolepsy, REM sleep behaviour disorder etc.);
- Coagulopathy or oral anticoagulant therapy (except low-dose acetylsalicylic acid) in conditions that do not allow for a temporary discontinuation;
- Active infection, systemic or localized;
- Known immune deficiency;
- Presence of spinal cord or peripheral nerve stimulators;
- Any disease process or condition that may make the effect of the treatment difficult to evaluate (e.g. cancer with low life expectancy);
- Severe psychiatric disorders (including substance abuse, major depression, and similar severe disorders known or suspected non-compliance) which could have a negative influence on successful treatment;
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, dementia, etc. of the participant;
- Women who are pregnant or breast feeding;
- Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Clinica Ars Medica
Gravesano, Canton Ticino, 6929, Switzerland
Sleep Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland - EOC
Lugano, Canton Ticino, 6900, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor Eva Koetsier, PhD, LL.M, Specialist in Anaesthesiology and Interventional Pain Management
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2026
First Posted
May 6, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 14, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 14, 2029
Last Updated
May 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04