Efficacy and Safety of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Spinal Cord Stimulation
SCORS-DOC
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Investigating the efficacy and safety of spinal cord stimulation for patients with disorders of consciousness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 23, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 10, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2026
ExpectedJanuary 7, 2025
January 1, 2025
12 months
June 23, 2024
January 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effective rate of awakening
The CRS-R is employed, with a minimum of 5 CRS-R assessments conducted at each follow-up time point, accompanied by simultaneous video recording. And the highest value is scored as a state of consciousness. The clinical assessment of participants' consciousness is deemed significantly improved when it fulfills the following criteria: a) MCS- recover to consciousness level of MCS+ or higher; b) MCS status (MCS- or MCS+) recover to emergence from MCS (restoration of functional communication).
SCS stimulation for 3 months after operation
Secondary Outcomes (9)
The difference of CRS-R scale relative to baseline between SCS group and Sham group
SCS stimulation for 14 days, 1-month-postoperative-stimulation, 3-month-postoperative-stimulation, 6-month-postoperative-stimulation
The difference of SECONDs scale relative to baseline between SCS group and Sham group
SCS stimulation for 14 days, 1-month-postoperative-stimulation, 3-month-postoperative-stimulation, 6-month-postoperative-stimulation
The difference of modified Ashworth scale relative to baseline between SCS group and Sham group
SCS stimulation for 14 days, 1-month-postoperative-stimulation, 3-month-postoperative-stimulation, 6-month-postoperative-stimulation
The NCS-R scale relative to baseline between SCS group and Sham group
SCS stimulation for 14 days, 1-month-postoperative-stimulation, 3-month-postoperative-stimulation, 6-month-postoperative-stimulation
The difference of effective rate of awakening between SCS group and Sham group by SECONDs scale
SCS stimulation for 3-month-postoperative-stimulation
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Security outcome
3 months after operation
Security outcome
3 months after operation
Study Arms (2)
SCS group
EXPERIMENTALSCS stimulation therapy is initiated 1 week post-surgery, which is administered continuously for a duration of 6 months.
Sham group
SHAM COMPARATORSham stimulation therapy is initiated 1 week post-surgery, and SCS stimulation therapy is initiated 3 months post-surgery, which is stimulated continuously for a duration of 3 months.
Interventions
Sham stimulation will be performed in the first three months after surgery, and SCS stimulation will be started in the fourth month after surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female patients between the ages of 18 and 65, experiencing DOC for a duration ranging from 3 months to 1 year following brain disease.
- Patients diagnosed with DOC as a consequence of traumatic brain injury, hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, or severe cerebral infarction.
- Patients exhibiting stable cerebral anatomy and no need for further cranioplasty or hydrocephalus shunt.
- Patients in MCS, who fulfill at least one of the following criteria: ① Demonstrating an oriented response to noxious stimuli; ② Exhibiting sustained eye tracking behavior; ③ Displaying purposeful movements; ④ Manifesting comprehension of language or emotions and actions (often observed in specific environments such as when hearing family members crying).
- The vital signs and state of consciousness are stable: normal body temperature, the spontaneous breathing is stable (minimal sputum production and respiratory stability without oxygen supplementation for at least 2 hours); there is no significant change in the level of consciousness for at least 1 month and more.
- Presence of short-latency responses (N20/P25) on somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) recorded from the median nerve in the upper limbs.
- Written informed consent obtained from legal guardians or representatives.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a history of severe neurological or psychiatric disorders, or other significant diseases impacting prognosis prior to the onset of DOC;
- Patients with contraindications for surgery, such as acute infections or coagulation disorders;
- Patients who require short-wave diathermy treatment and are unable to undergo neurostimulation;
- Patients with hypoxic brain injury due to suffocation, cardiac arrest, or respiratory arrest;
- Patients with brainstem hemorrhage;
- Pregnant women;
- Patients who voluntarily request SCS implantation but are unwilling to cooperate with the research protocol;
- Participants in other clinical trials.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350000, China
Xiangya Hospital,Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, 410000, China
Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200000, China
Related Publications (18)
van Erp WS, Lavrijsen JC, Vos PE, Bor H, Laureys S, Koopmans RT. The vegetative state: prevalence, misdiagnosis, and treatment limitations. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Jan;16(1):85.e9-85.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.10.014.
PMID: 25528282BACKGROUNDMaas AIR, Menon DK, Manley GT, Abrams M, Akerlund C, Andelic N, Aries M, Bashford T, Bell MJ, Bodien YG, Brett BL, Buki A, Chesnut RM, Citerio G, Clark D, Clasby B, Cooper DJ, Czeiter E, Czosnyka M, Dams-O'Connor K, De Keyser V, Diaz-Arrastia R, Ercole A, van Essen TA, Falvey E, Ferguson AR, Figaji A, Fitzgerald M, Foreman B, Gantner D, Gao G, Giacino J, Gravesteijn B, Guiza F, Gupta D, Gurnell M, Haagsma JA, Hammond FM, Hawryluk G, Hutchinson P, van der Jagt M, Jain S, Jain S, Jiang JY, Kent H, Kolias A, Kompanje EJO, Lecky F, Lingsma HF, Maegele M, Majdan M, Markowitz A, McCrea M, Meyfroidt G, Mikolic A, Mondello S, Mukherjee P, Nelson D, Nelson LD, Newcombe V, Okonkwo D, Oresic M, Peul W, Pisica D, Polinder S, Ponsford J, Puybasset L, Raj R, Robba C, Roe C, Rosand J, Schueler P, Sharp DJ, Smielewski P, Stein MB, von Steinbuchel N, Stewart W, Steyerberg EW, Stocchetti N, Temkin N, Tenovuo O, Theadom A, Thomas I, Espin AT, Turgeon AF, Unterberg A, Van Praag D, van Veen E, Verheyden J, Vyvere TV, Wang KKW, Wiegers EJA, Williams WH, Wilson L, Wisniewski SR, Younsi A, Yue JK, Yuh EL, Zeiler FA, Zeldovich M, Zemek R; InTBIR Participants and Investigators. Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2022 Nov;21(11):1004-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00309-X. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
PMID: 36183712BACKGROUNDWu S, Wu B, Liu M, Chen Z, Wang W, Anderson CS, Sandercock P, Wang Y, Huang Y, Cui L, Pu C, Jia J, Zhang T, Liu X, Zhang S, Xie P, Fan D, Ji X, Wong KL, Wang L; China Stroke Study Collaboration. Stroke in China: advances and challenges in epidemiology, prevention, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Apr;18(4):394-405. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30500-3.
PMID: 30878104BACKGROUNDMulti-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). N Engl J Med. 1994 May 26;330(21):1499-508. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199405263302107.
PMID: 7818633BACKGROUNDGiacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH, Whyte J, Zafonte RD, Zasler ND. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002 Feb 12;58(3):349-53. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.3.349.
PMID: 11839831BACKGROUNDThibaut A, Bruno MA, Ledoux D, Demertzi A, Laureys S. tDCS in patients with disorders of consciousness: sham-controlled randomized double-blind study. Neurology. 2014 Apr 1;82(13):1112-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000260. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
PMID: 24574549BACKGROUNDGiacino JT, Whyte J, Bagiella E, Kalmar K, Childs N, Khademi A, Eifert B, Long D, Katz DI, Cho S, Yablon SA, Luther M, Hammond FM, Nordenbo A, Novak P, Mercer W, Maurer-Karattup P, Sherer M. Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):819-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102609.
PMID: 22375973BACKGROUNDDenison T, Morrell MJ. Neuromodulation in 2035: The Neurology Future Forecasting Series. Neurology. 2022 Jan 11;98(2):65-72. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013061.
PMID: 35263267BACKGROUNDPetersen EA, Stauss TG, Scowcroft JA, Brooks ES, White JL, Sills SM, Amirdelfan K, Guirguis MN, Xu J, Yu C, Nairizi A, Patterson DG, Tsoulfas KC, Creamer MJ, Galan V, Bundschu RH, Paul CA, Mehta ND, Choi H, Sayed D, Lad SP, DiBenedetto DJ, Sethi KA, Goree JH, Bennett MT, Harrison NJ, Israel AF, Chang P, Wu PW, Gekht G, Argoff CE, Nasr CE, Taylor RS, Subbaroyan J, Gliner BE, Caraway DL, Mekhail NA. Effect of High-frequency (10-kHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2021 Jun 1;78(6):687-698. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0538.
PMID: 33818600BACKGROUNDHara S, Andresen H, Solheim O, Carlsen SM, Sundstrom T, Lonne G, Lonne VV, Taraldsen K, Tronvik EA, Oie LR, Gulati AM, Sagberg LM, Jakola AS, Solberg TK, Nygaard OP, Salvesen OO, Gulati S. Effect of Spinal Cord Burst Stimulation vs Placebo Stimulation on Disability in Patients With Chronic Radicular Pain After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022 Oct 18;328(15):1506-1514. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18231.
PMID: 36255427BACKGROUNDMekhail N, Levy RM, Deer TR, Kapural L, Li S, Amirdelfan K, Hunter CW, Rosen SM, Costandi SJ, Falowski SM, Burgher AH, Pope JE, Gilmore CA, Qureshi FA, Staats PS, Scowcroft J, Carlson J, Kim CK, Yang MI, Stauss T, Poree L; Evoke Study Group. Long-term safety and efficacy of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation to treat chronic back and leg pain (Evoke): a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020 Feb;19(2):123-134. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30414-4. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
PMID: 31870766BACKGROUNDNorth RB, Kidd DH, Zahurak M, James CS, Long DM. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: experience over two decades. Neurosurgery. 1993 Mar;32(3):384-94; discussion 394-5. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199303000-00008.
PMID: 8455763BACKGROUNDFunahashi K, Komai N, Ogura M, Kuwata T, Nakai M, Tsuji N. [Effects and indications of spinal cord stimulation on the vegetative syndrome]. No Shinkei Geka. 1989 Oct;17(10):917-23. Japanese.
PMID: 2812256BACKGROUNDKanno T, Morita I, Yamaguchi S, Yokoyama T, Kamei Y, Anil SM, Karagiozov KL. Dorsal column stimulation in persistent vegetative state. Neuromodulation. 2009 Jan;12(1):33-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2009.00185.x.
PMID: 22151220BACKGROUNDPiedade GS, Assumpcao de Monaco B, Guest JD, Cordeiro JG. Review of spinal cord stimulation for disorders of consciousness. Curr Opin Neurol. 2023 Dec 1;36(6):507-515. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001222. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
PMID: 37889524BACKGROUNDKinfe TM, Pintea B, Vatter H. Is Spinal Cord Stimulation Useful and Safe for the Treatment of Chronic Pain of Ischemic Origin? A Review. Clin J Pain. 2016 Jan;32(1):7-13. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000229.
PMID: 25760739BACKGROUNDGiacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, Whyte J, Ashman EJ, Ashwal S, Barbano R, Hammond FM, Laureys S, Ling GSF, Nakase-Richardson R, Seel RT, Yablon S, Getchius TSD, Gronseth GS, Armstrong MJ. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: Disorders of consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Neurology. 2018 Sep 4;91(10):450-460. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005926. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
PMID: 30089618BACKGROUNDThibaut A, Schiff N, Giacino J, Laureys S, Gosseries O. Therapeutic interventions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jun;18(6):600-614. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30031-6. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
PMID: 31003899BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xuehai Wu, Ph.D.
Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This study is being conducted as a double-blind trial, wherein the surgeons, assessors and participants' family members are kept unaware of the assigned research groups. However, it is necessary to inform the physicians responsible for adjustment of stimulation parameters about the allocation of participants. Follow-up assessments of participants after stimulation will be conducted by an independent assessor using standardized evaluation criteria.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Director of Shanghai Neurosurgical Emergency Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2024
First Posted
July 23, 2024
Study Start
January 10, 2025
Primary Completion
December 30, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 30, 2026
Last Updated
January 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share