CoreSys Monitoring for Intraoperative Stress Management in Abdominal Hysterectomy
CORESTRESS
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial evaluates whether intraoperative guidance using the CoreSys monitor reduces the surgical stress response in patients undergoing elective open abdominal hysterectomy. Surgical stress involves complex hemodynamic, endocrine, and inflammatory responses that may negatively impact postoperative recovery. Patients will be randomized to either anesthesia guided by conventional clinical and hemodynamic parameters or anesthesia additionally guided by CoreSys-derived indices of consciousness, nociception, and stress activity. The primary objective is to assess whether CoreSys-guided anesthesia attenuates stress biomarkers, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), cortisol and glycemia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 12, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2026
May 6, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.4 years
April 12, 2026
April 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels
Differences in serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels between baseline (preoperative), end of surgery, and 24 hours postoperatively, comparing CoreSys-guided anesthesia versus standard anesthesia.
Baseline (pre-induction), end of surgery, and 24 hours postoperatively
Change in cortisol levels
Differences in serum cortisol levels between baseline (preoperative), end of surgery, and 24 hours postoperatively, comparing CoreSys-guided anesthesia versus standard anesthesia.
Baseline (pre-induction), end of surgery, and 24 hours postoperatively
Change in blood glucose levels
Differences in blood glucose levels between baseline (preoperative), end of surgery, and 24 hours postoperatively, comparing CoreSys-guided anesthesia versus standard anesthesia.
Baseline (pre-induction), end of surgery, and 24 hours postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Intraoperative mean arterial pressure variability
From baseline (pre-induction) to end of surgery
Intraoperative heart rate variability
From baseline (pre-induction) to end of surgery
Intraoperative Brain Activity (BA)
From baseline (pre-induction) to end of surgery
Intraoperative Stress Activity (SA)
From baseline (pre-induction) to end of surgery
Intraoperative burst suppression (BS)
From baseline (pre-induction) to end of surgery
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
CoreSys-guided anesthesia
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive total intravenous anesthesia guided by standard clinical and hemodynamic parameters plus CoreSys monitoring indices (brain activity, stress activity, and response to inflammation). Standard monitoring includes non-invasive blood pressure, electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, and capnography. Anesthesia is adjusted according to these parameters.
Standard anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive total intravenous anesthesia guided by standard clinical and hemodynamic parameters. Standard monitoring includes non-invasive blood pressure, electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, and capnography. CoreSys monitoring is performed but not visible to the treating anesthesiologist and does not influence clinical management. Data are recorded by a second investigator.
Interventions
Intravenous administration of propofol using target-controlled infusion (TCI) based on the Marsh pharmacokinetic model for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia.
A non-invasive monitoring device that integrates electroencephalographic and autonomic signals to assess hypnotic level, nociception, and intraoperative stress indices.
Intravenous administration of remifentanil using target-controlled infusion (TCI) based on the Minto pharmacokinetic model for intraoperative analgesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients aged 18-70 years
- Scheduled elective open abdominal hysterectomy in the morning
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate
- Significant endocrine/metabolic disease
- Pacemaker or major arrhythmias
- Contraindication to epidural anesthesia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hospital Provincial de Rosariolead
- Coresys Healthcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Provincial de Rosario
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2001SBL, Argentina
Related Publications (6)
Brown EN, Lydic R, Schiff ND. General anesthesia, sleep, and coma. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 30;363(27):2638-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0808281. No abstract available.
PMID: 21190458BACKGROUNDAbad-Gurumeta A, Ripolles-Melchor J, Casans-Frances R, Calvo-Vecino JM. Monitoring of nociception, reality or fiction? Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2017 Aug-Sep;64(7):406-414. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Mar 22. English, Spanish.
PMID: 28341079RESULTPurdon PL, Sampson A, Pavone KJ, Brown EN. Clinical Electroencephalography for Anesthesiologists: Part I: Background and Basic Signatures. Anesthesiology. 2015 Oct;123(4):937-60. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000841.
PMID: 26275092RESULTAldecoa C, Bettelli G, Bilotta F, Sanders RD, Audisio R, Borozdina A, Cherubini A, Jones C, Kehlet H, MacLullich A, Radtke F, Riese F, Slooter AJ, Veyckemans F, Kramer S, Neuner B, Weiss B, Spies CD. European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Apr;34(4):192-214. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000594.
PMID: 28187050RESULTCusack B, Buggy DJ. Anaesthesia, analgesia, and the surgical stress response. BJA Educ. 2020 Sep;20(9):321-328. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Jul 21. No abstract available.
PMID: 33456967RESULTDesborough JP. The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jul;85(1):109-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/85.1.109. No abstract available.
PMID: 10927999RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants are blinded to group allocation. In the control group, CoreSys monitoring data are recorded but not visible to the anesthesiologist. A second investigator monitors these values and intervenes only for patient safety if predefined thresholds are exceeded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 12, 2026
First Posted
May 6, 2026
Study Start
January 8, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 30, 2026
Last Updated
May 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared due to the limited sample size and the absence of a formal data-sharing plan. Data will be used solely for the purposes of this study and reported in aggregate form to ensure participant confidentiality.