Laryngeal Mask Airways Are Supraglottic Devices Used to Maintain Airway Patency During Anesthesia and in Difficult Airways. IV Dexmedetomidine Improves LMA Insertion Success and Decreases Coughing, While IV Lidocaine Decreases Postoperative Cough.
DEX LMA
Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Vs. Lidocaine for Laryngeal Mask Insertion Conditions In Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgeries, A Randomized Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Laryngeal Mask Airways Are Supraglottic Devices Used to Maintain Airway Patency During Anesthesia and in Difficult Airways. LMA may help in reducing postoperative pulmonary complications. IV Dexmedetomidine Improves LMA Insertion Success and Decreases trials number, While IV Lidocaine Decreases Postoperative Cough. This is a randomized interventional trial comparing both drugs. IV DEX will be compared vs IV lidocaine regarding the feasibility of insertion, number of trials, incidence of cough, postoperative pulmonary complications and hemodynamic profile.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2026
May 1, 2026
April 1, 2026
3 months
April 25, 2026
April 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
First-attempt insertion success rate
The success of the first trial of classic LMA insertion will be assessed. Binary: yes or no.
After induction of anesthesia
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Ease of insertion (4-point scale)
After Induction of anesthesia
Heart rate
Every 15 minutes till recovery
MAP
Every 15 minutes
Recovery Time
After cessation of anesthesia administration
Postoperative Agitation
In PACU
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group (D) DEX
ACTIVE COMPARATORDose: 0.2 mcg/kg IV in 10 mL saline, infused over 10 min pre-induction.
Group (L) Lidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORDose: 1.5 mg/kg IV (max 100 mg) in 10 ml saline over 1 min before induction.
Interventions
IV 0.2 mic/ kg of dexmedetomidine will be diluted over 10 ml saline and given to the patient over 10 minutes before induction and assess the feasibility of classic LMA insertion
IV 1.5 mg/kg of lidocaine will be diluted over 10 ml saline and given to the patient 1 minute before induction and assess the feasibility of classic LMA insertion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parental/guardian consent. Age 2-12 years, ASA physical status I-II. Elective surgery requiring LMA (duration \<2 hours).
You may not qualify if:
- Known airway anomalies (e.g., tonsillar hypertrophy, cleft palate). Cardiovascular disease (bradycardia, arrhythmias). Allergy to study drugs. BMI \>95th percentile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medicine Assiut University
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71621, Egypt
Related Publications (3)
Li L, Zhang Z, Yao Z, Wang H, Wang H, An H, Yao J. The impact of laryngeal mask versus other airways on perioperative respiratory adverse events in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2019 Apr;64:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
PMID: 30878762BACKGROUNDJu Q, Xiao Z, Sun W, Zhu M, Lv P. The anesthesia induction effect of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing laryngeal mask intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7 RCTs. Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;10(12):12358-12366. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-2971.
PMID: 35016404BACKGROUNDGharaei B, Jafari A, Poor Zamany M, Kamranmanesh M, Aghamohammadi H, Roodneshin F, Teymourian H, Khazaie Y, Dadkhah P. Topical Versus Intravenous Lidocaine in Children With Upper Respiratory Infection Undergoing Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double Blind, Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Aug 22;5(4):e23501. doi: 10.5812/aapm.23501v2. eCollection 2015 Aug.
PMID: 26473098BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abdelrahman Hamdy
Asyut University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Anesthesia & ICU, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2026
First Posted
May 1, 2026
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 30, 2026
Last Updated
May 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 2027 after publishing the study and for 1 year after