NCT07108959

Brief Summary

The present study aims to compare the effect of ESPB versus perioperative iv lidocaine infusion on proinflammatory cytokines in breast cancer surgeries.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
8mo left

Started Aug 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress54%
Aug 2025Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 19, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2025

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

August 7, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

June 19, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 5, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

breast cancerESPBlidocaine infusioncytokines

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Measuring serum pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6) levels in pg/ml.

    by ELISA TECHNIQUE unit pg/ml.

    BASELINE, 2 HOURS POSTOPERATIVE AND 24 HOURS POSTOPERATIVE

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Effect on perioperative Heart rate

    24 hours

  • Effect on perioperative blood pressure

    24 hours

  • post-operative pain.

    24 hours

  • Duration of postoperative analgesia (min).

    24 hours

  • Perioperative analgesic consumptions.

    24 hours

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Group E

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

patients will receive ultrasound guided ESPB with 30 ml bupivacaine 0.25%.

Procedure: Erector spinae plane block (Group E)

Group L

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will receive 1.5mg/kg lidocaine 2%; intravenously as a bolus dose then 1.5mg/kg/hr lidocaine infusion using a 50cc syringe pump intraoperatively.

Procedure: Lidocaine (drug)

Interventions

The ultra sound probe will be placed on the paravertebral region in a Sagittal plane about 3 cm lateral to the T5 spinous process on the operating side to locate erector spinae muscle, rhomboid major and trapezius from inward (To reach T5, we used C7 as an anatomical landmark, which is the most prominent vertebrae in the back and count downwards to reach T5. To locate C7, we will use palpation or ultrasound guidance if there is difficulty in palpation). Following visualization of these muscles and the transverse process of T5, the skin will be infiltrated with 5 ml of 2% lidocaine, and then 30 ml bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected in the plane between the erector spinae muscle and transverse process using a 22-G 10-cm nerve block needle.

Group E

Patients in group L will receive an initial bolus of lidocaine 1.5mg /kg over 10 minutes immediately before the induction of general anaesthesia then 1.5mg/kg/hr lidocaine infusion in a 50cc syringe pump intra operatively that will be stopped at the end of surgery.

Group L

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 60 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 30 -60 years.
  • Female patients.
  • ASA physical status class I - II.
  • Elective resectable non metastatic breast cancer.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with history of sensitivity to the studied drugs.
  • Patients with cardiac conduction defects.
  • Patients with major spine deformities.
  • Patients with severe coagulopathy.
  • Patients with infection at injection site.
  • Patients with preexisting myopathy or neuropathy because it can worsen neurological deficits and increase sensitivity to local anaesthetic toxicity. Additionally, it complicates diagnosis of new symptoms and carries higher medicolegal risk due to difficulty distinguishing anaesthesia effects from disease progression.
  • Psychiatric disease or seizure disorder requiring medication within the previous 2 years.
  • Opioid tolerant patient.
  • Cognitive dysfunction.
  • Body Mass Index ( BMI ) more than 35 kg/m2 or less than 18 kg/m2 .

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Medicine , Alexandria University

Alexandria, Alexandria Governorate, 21526, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Interventions

LidocainePharmaceutical Preparations

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Central Study Contacts

Ahmed Abdelhamid Elsmany, Assistant lecturer

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Lecturer of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care , Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2025

First Posted

August 7, 2025

Study Start

August 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

August 7, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

practical and resource barriers

Locations