Low-Load BFR vs. High-Load Training on Biceps Hypertrophy
Bayesian Comparison of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction and High-Load Resistance Exercise on Biceps Brachii Muscle Hypertrophy in Untrained Men
2 other identifiers
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aimed to compare the effects of low-load blood flow restriction resistance exercise (BFR-RE) performed to voluntary failure with traditional high-load resistance exercise (HL-RE) and a control condition on biceps brachii muscle hypertrophy, muscle stiffness, and maximal strength in untrained young men. Participants completed an 8-week training program, with exercise performed three times per week. Outcomes were assessed using ultrasound imaging, elastography, and one-repetition maximum (1RM) testing. The study evaluates whether low-load BFR training can produce adaptations comparable to high-load resistance training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2026
CompletedMay 1, 2026
April 1, 2026
2 months
April 24, 2026
April 24, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Biceps Brachii Muscle Thickness
Muscle thickness of the biceps brachii was assessed using ultrasound imaging to evaluate hypertrophic adaptations following the intervention.
Baseline and 8 weeks (post-intervention), with an additional follow-up measurement at 1 week after the intervention
Study Arms (3)
BFR-RE
EXPERIMENTALParticipants performed low-load resistance exercise with blood flow restriction using 30% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) and 60% limb occlusion pressure. Exercises were performed to voluntary failure, three times per week for 8 weeks.
HL-RE
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants performed traditional high-load resistance exercise at 70% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) without blood flow restriction, three times per week for 8 weeks.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants did not engage in any structured resistance training program and continued their normal daily activities throughout the 8-week study period.
Interventions
Resistance exercise was performed under partial vascular occlusion using a pneumatic cuff applied to the upper arm. Limb occlusion pressure was individually determined, and exercise was conducted at a relative intensity corresponding to a percentage of one-repetition maximum. Occlusion pressure was maintained during sets and released between exercises. Training load and repetition tempo were standardized and progressively adjusted throughout the intervention period.
Participants performed resistance exercise using conventional loading strategies based on a percentage of one-repetition maximum. Training intensity, volume, and progression were standardized across sessions, with loads adjusted periodically according to performance assessments.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Karabuk Universitycollaborator
- Mehmet Akif Ersoy Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Karabük University Faculty of Sport Sciences
Karabük, 37100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This study employed a single-blind design in which outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment while participants care providers and investigators were not blinded due to the nature of the exercise intervention.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2026
First Posted
May 1, 2026
Study Start
June 1, 2025
Primary Completion
August 3, 2025
Study Completion
August 3, 2025
Last Updated
May 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04