NCT07560137

Brief Summary

Mallet finger fractures are injuries affecting the tip of the finger and can be treated either with splinting or surgery. However, there is no clear agreement on which treatment provides better outcomes for certain types of these fractures. In this study, patients with mallet finger fractures were randomly assigned to receive either surgical treatment using a pin-orthosis extension-block pinning technique or conservative treatment with splint immobilization. Patients were followed at regular intervals, and outcomes such as finger movement, function, bone healing, and complications were evaluated over time. The purpose of this study is to compare these two treatment approaches and determine which one leads to better clinical and functional outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
62

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 13, 2022

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 15, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 15, 2024

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 23, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 30, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

April 30, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

April 23, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 23, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Conservative treatmentcrawford criteriaextension-block pinning techniquemallet fracturepin orthosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Distal Interphalangeal Joint Extension Lag

    Degree of extension lag at the distal interphalangeal joint measured using a goniometer.

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Distal Interphalangeal Joint Range of Motion

    Up to 12 months (assessed at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months)

  • Functional Outcome According to Crawford Criteria

    12 months

  • Fracture Union

    Up to 12 months (assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months)

  • Complication Rate

    Up to 12 months

Study Arms (2)

Surgical Treatment (PO-EBPT)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group underwent surgical treatment using the pin-orthosis extension-block pinning technique.

Procedure: Pin-Orthosis Extension-Block Pinning Technique

Conservative Treatment (Splinting)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in this group received conservative treatment with splint immobilization of the distal interphalangeal joint.

Procedure: Splinting

Interventions

The pin-orthosis extension-block pinning technique was performed under appropriate anesthesia. A Kirschner wire was used to block extension at the distal interphalangeal joint and stabilize the fracture fragment, followed by immobilization with an orthosis. The fixation was maintained for a defined period, and patients were followed according to the study protocol.

Surgical Treatment (PO-EBPT)
SplintingPROCEDURE

Conservative treatment consisted of continuous splint immobilization of the distal interphalangeal joint in extension. Patients were instructed to maintain uninterrupted splint use for the recommended duration with regular follow-up visits to monitor compliance and clinical progress.

Conservative Treatment (Splinting)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Acute mallet fracture (≤ 3 weeks from injury)
  • Fracture fragment involving 20-50% of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint articular surface

You may not qualify if:

  • Open fractures
  • Chronic mallet fractures (\> 3 weeks from injury)
  • Fracture fragment involving more than 50% of the DIP joint articular surface
  • Open physes
  • Inability to complete 12-month follow-up

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Haseki Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, Sultangazi, 34265, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Splints

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

External FixatorsOrthopedic Fixation DevicesOrthopedic EquipmentSurgical EquipmentEquipment and SuppliesSurgical Fixation Devices

Study Officials

  • Kemal A Col, Doctor

    Haseki Training and Research Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants were randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups: surgical treatment using the pin-orthosis extension-block pinning technique or conservative treatment with splinting. Each participant remained in the assigned group throughout the study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Orthopaedic Surgeon

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2026

First Posted

April 30, 2026

Study Start

January 13, 2022

Primary Completion

October 15, 2024

Study Completion

October 15, 2024

Last Updated

April 30, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared due to privacy and institutional data protection policies.

Locations