Extension Block Pinning vs Conservative Treatment for Mallet Finger Fractures
PO-EBPT
Pin Orthosis Extension Block Pinning Versus Conservative Treatment for Doyle Type 4B Mallet Fractures
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Mallet finger fractures are injuries affecting the tip of the finger and can be treated either with splinting or surgery. However, there is no clear agreement on which treatment provides better outcomes for certain types of these fractures. In this study, patients with mallet finger fractures were randomly assigned to receive either surgical treatment using a pin-orthosis extension-block pinning technique or conservative treatment with splint immobilization. Patients were followed at regular intervals, and outcomes such as finger movement, function, bone healing, and complications were evaluated over time. The purpose of this study is to compare these two treatment approaches and determine which one leads to better clinical and functional outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 13, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2026
CompletedApril 30, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.8 years
April 23, 2026
April 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Distal Interphalangeal Joint Extension Lag
Degree of extension lag at the distal interphalangeal joint measured using a goniometer.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Distal Interphalangeal Joint Range of Motion
Up to 12 months (assessed at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months)
Functional Outcome According to Crawford Criteria
12 months
Fracture Union
Up to 12 months (assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months)
Complication Rate
Up to 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Surgical Treatment (PO-EBPT)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group underwent surgical treatment using the pin-orthosis extension-block pinning technique.
Conservative Treatment (Splinting)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group received conservative treatment with splint immobilization of the distal interphalangeal joint.
Interventions
The pin-orthosis extension-block pinning technique was performed under appropriate anesthesia. A Kirschner wire was used to block extension at the distal interphalangeal joint and stabilize the fracture fragment, followed by immobilization with an orthosis. The fixation was maintained for a defined period, and patients were followed according to the study protocol.
Conservative treatment consisted of continuous splint immobilization of the distal interphalangeal joint in extension. Patients were instructed to maintain uninterrupted splint use for the recommended duration with regular follow-up visits to monitor compliance and clinical progress.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 65 years
- Acute mallet fracture (≤ 3 weeks from injury)
- Fracture fragment involving 20-50% of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint articular surface
You may not qualify if:
- Open fractures
- Chronic mallet fractures (\> 3 weeks from injury)
- Fracture fragment involving more than 50% of the DIP joint articular surface
- Open physes
- Inability to complete 12-month follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Haseki Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Sultangazi, 34265, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kemal A Col, Doctor
Haseki Training and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Orthopaedic Surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2026
First Posted
April 30, 2026
Study Start
January 13, 2022
Primary Completion
October 15, 2024
Study Completion
October 15, 2024
Last Updated
April 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared due to privacy and institutional data protection policies.