Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Pain and Functional Outcome in Cervical Radiculopathy
CR
1 other identifier
interventional
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
this study will be conducted to compare between transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on pain and functional outcome in cervical radiculopathy
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 30, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2026
April 29, 2026
April 1, 2026
3 months
April 23, 2026
April 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
pain intensity
it will be measured using neumerical pain rating scale (NPRS), There are 11 components in total, with a scoring range from 0 to 10, where 0 signifies the absence of pain, and 10 indicates the highest level of pain.
up to 6 weeks
neck disability
it will be measured using Neck disability index. It consists of a series of questions related to various activities, and the patient rates their level of difficulty in performing each activity on a scale from 0 to 5 where grade 0 represents no to negligible symptoms and grade 5 represents severe symptoms. The total score will be then calculated and converted into a percentage with higher scores indicating greater disability and limitations due to neck pain. 0-20% indicates normal condition, 21-40% indicates mild disability, 41-60% indicates moderate disability, 61-80% indicates severe disability, and more than 80% indicates exaggerated dis ability.
up to 6 weeks
sympathetic skin response
The sympathetic skin response is a measurement of the electrical potential generated by sweat glands in response to a stimulus, indicating sympathetic nervous system activity. SSR has been proposed as a non-invasive approach to investigate the function of the sympathetic system. it will be measured by electromyography device. Normal, resting adult values are commonly defined by a hand latency of 1.3-1.5 seconds, foot latency of 1.9-2.1 seconds, and an amplitude greater than 1 mV in the hand and 0.2 mV in the foot.
up to 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
cervical range of motion
up to 6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
EXPERIMENTAL25 of cervical radiculopathy patients will participated in this group. They will receive peripheral nerve stimulation by using TENS (80-150ms) for 20 min. After that they will underwent the conventional physical therapy session for 3 days a week for 6 weeks
repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
EXPERIMENTAL25 of cervical radiculopathy patients will participated in this group. They will receive cranial stimulation by using rtms 10 Hz frequency (90% rMT) for 20-minute duration (each trial includes 20 pulses in 2 seconds and 8 seconds intertrain interval). This process was repeated for three sessions in three consecutive days for 6 weeks
Interventions
patients will receive TENS to relieve peripheral radiating pain, with high frequency (80 Hz), low intensity (as per the patient's comfort but will not be painful and not elicit the muscle contraction) and a pulse width of 150 µs of asymmetrical biphasic rectangular waveforms, will be used for 20 min+ cinventional therapy in the form of Moist Heat followed by cervical traction in a seated position manually followed by nerve glides and Chin Tuck exercises
Participants will be seated in an rTMS chair with a head and armrest. The resting motor threshold (rTMS) will be defined using visual observation of muscle twitch , For this method, rTMS Applied at Primary Motor Cortex (M1): The stimulation is applied over the M1 region contralateral to the side of pain. Frequency: High-frequency rTMS, typically at 10 Hz, is employed to enhance cortical excitability. the patient's hand will be placed on the armrest and rMT will be set as the lowest setting at which ≥10 of 20 stimuli resulted in any observable contraction of the right thumb (abductor pollicis brevis \[ABP\]muscles). The rTMS system was set on 10 Hz frequency (90% rMT), (900 pulses \[45 trials\] were delivered to the right motor cortex \[position C4\] or 900 pulses \[45 trials\] were delivered to the left motor cortex \[position C3\]), and 20-minute duration (each trial includes 20 pulses in 2 seconds and 8 seconds.plus conventional therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients will be from both sexes, aged between (30 to 45) years
- patients will be diagnosed as cervical radiculopathy unilateral upper limb pain radiating in C5,6 and C6,7 in the lateral aspect of the arm, forearm and hand for at least 3 months sensory in nature. (Sharma et al., 2025).
- The Neck Disability Index (NDI) NDI more than 20%.
- body mass index (BMI) was (18.5 to 29.9) Kg/m2.
- Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score \> 6 y
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a history of injury to the cervical spine.
- Patients who underwent cervicothoracic spine surgery, motor manifestations , spinal canal stenosis, bilateral symptoms, upper motor neuron impairments.
- Use of steroids and pharmacological therapy.
- Any congenital anomaly like cervical rib.
- Pregnancy, oncological episodes.
- The presence of a pacemaker, cochlear implant.
- Epilepsy, psychotropic drug intake before admission, neurological disorders (such as stroke and plexopathies),
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- opaque sealed envelope
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principle investigator : Rania fathy mustafa barseem
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2026
First Posted
April 29, 2026
Study Start
April 30, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04