Bupivacaine-Lidocaine vs Bupivacaine for Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
PSSNB-BL
Bupivacaine-Lidocaine Combination Versus Bupivacaine Alone for Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block in Elective Lower Extremity Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy of two local anesthetic regimens for ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block in adult patients undergoing elective distal lower extremity surgery. Eligible participants (ages 18-65, ASA physical status I-III, BMI 18-35 kg/m²) will be randomized into two equal groups of 20. Patients in Group BL will receive a combination of 10 mL 2% lidocaine and 10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine, while patients in Group B will receive 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine alone, administered via ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block prior to surgery. The primary outcome is the onset time of sensory and motor blockade. Secondary outcomes include block success rate, duration of sensory and motor block, postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively, Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score, and incidence of rebound pain. The study is conducted at Ataturk University Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Erzurum, Turkey.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
April 24, 2026
April 1, 2026
1 year
April 15, 2026
April 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sensory and Motor Block Onset Time
Time elapsed from completion of local anesthetic injection to first achievement of block success criteria, defined as a total sensorimotor score ≥12/14 and sensory score ≥7/8. Blocks not meeting success criteria within 60 minutes will be considered failed.
From completion of injection up to 60 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Block Success Rate
Within 60 minutes after injection
Duration of Sensory Block
Up to 72 hours after block application
Duration of Motor Block
Up to 72 hours after block application
Postoperative Opioid Consumption
First 24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative Pain Score
At 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group BL (Bupivacaine-Lidocaine)
EXPERIMENTALUltrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block with 10 mL 2% lidocaine + 10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine administered sequentially in separate syringes (total volume: 20 mL).
Group B (Bupivacaine Alone)
ACTIVE COMPARATORUltrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block with 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine administered in two 10 mL syringes (total volume: 20 mL).
Interventions
Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block with 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine administered in two separate 10 mL syringes (total volume: 20 mL).
Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block with 10 mL 2% lidocaine and 10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine administered sequentially in separate syringes (total volume: 20 mL).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 65 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I, II, or III
- Scheduled for elective distal lower extremity surgery (below-knee)
- Body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 35 kg/m²
- Provision of written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate in the study
- Morbid obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m²)
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any local anesthetic agent
- Severe cardiac, hepatic, or renal disease
- Pre-existing neurological deficits or peripheral neuropathy
- Use of anticoagulant therapy
- History of prior surgery or significant scar tissue in the popliteal fossa
- Pregnancy
- Chronic opioid use at home
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ataturk University
Erzurum, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Wieder B, Arbisfeld J. Overriding Safety Controls. Am J Nurs. 2023 Nov 1;123(11):9. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000995280.93037.b9. No abstract available.
PMID: 37882382BACKGROUNDGallipoli A, MacLean G, Walia JS, Sehgal A. Congenital Chylothorax and Hydrops Fetalis: A Novel Neonatal Presentation of RASA1 Mutation. Pediatrics. 2021 Mar;147(3):e2020011601. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-011601.
PMID: 33608416BACKGROUNDOcchipinti G, Ruberti AA, Alcocer J, Gimenez-Mila M, Vidal B, Regueiro A. Sex differences in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: a tale of 2 hearts. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2025 Oct;78(10):916-918. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2025.01.014. Epub 2025 Feb 6. No abstract available. English, Spanish.
PMID: 39922556BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
AHMET MURAT YAYIK, MD, PhD
Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
ASLIHAN BOROGLU, MD
Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Study solutions are prepared by a dedicated investigator not involved in block performance or outcome assessment. The patient, the anesthesiologist performing the block, and the outcome assessor are all blinded to group allocation. Randomization is based on a computer-generated random number list.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2026
First Posted
April 24, 2026
Study Start
December 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share