NCT06373185

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of caudal block and sacral espb used as a postoperative analgesia method in urogenital pediatric surgery cases.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 15, 2024

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 18, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 22, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 22, 2024

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 18, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 22, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

April 15, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 18, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

sacral erector spinae plane blockcaudal blocknerve blockanesthesia, generalurogenital surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) score

    The FLACC is an observational pain scale. It is widely used in the paediatric population to assess pain in infants and children who are unable to verbally express their pain.Each category is scored on the 0-2 scale which results in a total score of 0-10.

    baseline ,and 24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Analgesic requirement

    baseline, and 24 hours

  • Satisfaction of the patient's parents

    24. hours

  • Satisfaction of the surgeons

    24.hours

Study Arms (2)

SESPB

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received ultrasound-guided SESPB before the surgery

Procedure: Ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block

CAUDAL

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants received ultrasound-guided caudal block before the surgery

Procedure: Ultrasound-guided caudal block

Interventions

Patients were received ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block, 1ml/kg %0.25 bupivacaine (max 20 ml), for postoperative pain management

SESPB

Patients were received ultrasound-guided caudal block, 1ml/kg %0.25 bupivacaine (max 20 ml), for postoperative pain management

CAUDAL

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year - 7 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 1-7 years undergoing paediatric urogenital surgery
  • Patients in American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class I-II

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients whose parents do not give consent
  • Patients with anatomical changes in the sacral region, previous surgery, scar and infection,
  • Patients with known local anaesthetic allergy
  • Patients for whom regional anaesthesia is contraindicated
  • Known neurological or muscular disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Giresun Research and Training Hospital

Giresun, Central, 28100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urogenital DiseasesPain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Bilge Olgun Keleş

    Giresun University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Dilek Yeniay

    Giresun University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Elvan Tekir Yılmaz

    Giresun University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • İlke Tamdoğan

    Giresun University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Mehmet Değermenci

    Giresun University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Randomisation using a closed envelope method based on computer-generated random numbers was to assign patients to two equal groups. Group 1 received midline US-guided sacral erector spinae plane block and Group 2 received caudal block. The experienced anesthetist who opened the envelope performed the block according to the group code and patients were followed postoperatively by an anesthetist blinded to which block was performed. Patients were also blinded as to which block was performed.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled double blind study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2024

First Posted

April 18, 2024

Study Start

April 22, 2024

Primary Completion

June 22, 2024

Study Completion

July 18, 2024

Last Updated

July 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Locations