Comparison of the Efficacy of Sacral Espb and Caudal Block for Pain Management After Urogenital Surgeries in Children
SESPB
Comparison of the Effects of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Caudal Block on Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Urogenital Surgery Cases
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of caudal block and sacral espb used as a postoperative analgesia method in urogenital pediatric surgery cases.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 22, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 18, 2024
CompletedJuly 22, 2024
July 1, 2024
2 months
April 15, 2024
July 18, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) score
The FLACC is an observational pain scale. It is widely used in the paediatric population to assess pain in infants and children who are unable to verbally express their pain.Each category is scored on the 0-2 scale which results in a total score of 0-10.
baseline ,and 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Analgesic requirement
baseline, and 24 hours
Satisfaction of the patient's parents
24. hours
Satisfaction of the surgeons
24.hours
Study Arms (2)
SESPB
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received ultrasound-guided SESPB before the surgery
CAUDAL
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received ultrasound-guided caudal block before the surgery
Interventions
Patients were received ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block, 1ml/kg %0.25 bupivacaine (max 20 ml), for postoperative pain management
Patients were received ultrasound-guided caudal block, 1ml/kg %0.25 bupivacaine (max 20 ml), for postoperative pain management
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 1-7 years undergoing paediatric urogenital surgery
- Patients in American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class I-II
You may not qualify if:
- Patients whose parents do not give consent
- Patients with anatomical changes in the sacral region, previous surgery, scar and infection,
- Patients with known local anaesthetic allergy
- Patients for whom regional anaesthesia is contraindicated
- Known neurological or muscular disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Giresun Research and Training Hospital
Giresun, Central, 28100, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bilge Olgun Keleş
Giresun University
- STUDY CHAIR
Dilek Yeniay
Giresun University
- STUDY CHAIR
Elvan Tekir Yılmaz
Giresun University
- STUDY CHAIR
İlke Tamdoğan
Giresun University
- STUDY CHAIR
Mehmet Değermenci
Giresun University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Randomisation using a closed envelope method based on computer-generated random numbers was to assign patients to two equal groups. Group 1 received midline US-guided sacral erector spinae plane block and Group 2 received caudal block. The experienced anesthetist who opened the envelope performed the block according to the group code and patients were followed postoperatively by an anesthetist blinded to which block was performed. Patients were also blinded as to which block was performed.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2024
First Posted
April 18, 2024
Study Start
April 22, 2024
Primary Completion
June 22, 2024
Study Completion
July 18, 2024
Last Updated
July 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07