NCT07544771

Brief Summary

This randomized, multicenter clinical trial will evaluate whether remote management guided by the HeartLogic™ algorithm improves outcomes compared with traditional face-to-face follow-up in adult patients with heart failure recently implanted with a HeartLogic™-enabled ICD or CRT-D device. The primary objective is to determine whether this strategy reduces, at 12 months, the proportion of patients with death, unscheduled hospitalization for heart failure, or deterioration in quality of life. Secondary objectives include assessment of hospitalization, mortality, quality of life, safety, and cost-effectiveness.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
578

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable heart-failure

Timeline
37mo left

Started Apr 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable heart-failure

Geographic Reach
1 country

15 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress2%
Apr 2026May 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 22, 2026

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 15, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 22, 2026

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 15, 2028

Expected
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 15, 2029

Last Updated

April 22, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

March 22, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 18, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

heart failureimplantable cardioverter defibrillatorremote monitoringhospitalizationquality of life

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of patients who are alive with no unscheduled hospitalization for heart failure and no deterioration in quality of life.

    The primary outcome is the proportion of patients, at 12 months, who are alive with no unscheduled hospitalization for heart failure and no deterioration in quality of life, defined as a reduction of 5 points or more in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ).

    12-month follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Win ratio

    12-month follow-up

  • Cumulative incidence of unscheduled hospitalization for heart failure

    12-month follow-up

  • Cumulative incidence of heart failure-related death

    12-month follow-up

  • Cumulative incidence of cardiovascular death

    12-month follow-up

  • Number of all-cause death

    12-month follow-up

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Remote HF management guided with the HeartLogic™ algorithm.

EXPERIMENTAL

After enrolment, patients of the intervention arm will be remotely followed up based on an alert-driven strategy by the local research coordinator. In case of index value ≥16, diuretics should be increased during 4 to 5 days, or HF guidelines directed medication therapy will be up titrated.

Other: Alert-guided remote follow-up

Conventional face-to-face HF management (no monitoring of HeartLogic alerts)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The control group is treated with a usual follow-up. Current guidelines recommend follow-up at intervals no longer than 6 months. They will be monitored at baseline, 6 and 12 months after inclusion.

Other: Traditional follow up

Interventions

Participants assigned to this intervention will receive alert-guided remote follow-up for heart failure. Device-generated alerts suggestive of worsening heart failure will be reviewed by the study team through the remote monitoring platform. When an alert occurs, patients may be contacted for symptom assessment and clinical evaluation, and treatment may be adjusted preemptively according to a predefined care pathway and local clinical practice.

Also known as: HeartLogic-guided remote follow-up
Remote HF management guided with the HeartLogic™ algorithm.

Patients will be monitored every 6 months as recommended by the guidelines

Conventional face-to-face HF management (no monitoring of HeartLogic alerts)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged ≥18 years old;
  • Patients implanted with a cardiac defibrillator for less than 6 months, with or without resynchronization, enabling the HeartLogic™ algorithm;
  • Patients with a history of HF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%; or at least one episode of clinical HF with NT-proBNP blood concentration ≥450 ng/L);
  • Patients with New York Heart Association Class II or III HF;
  • Patient able to comply with the protocol, including Latitude™ transmissions (including adequate connectivity), and study visits.
  • Patients with compulsory health insurance

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients not consenting and non-compliant with remote care directions.
  • Patients with invasive remote HF monitoring device (such as CardioMems);
  • Patients with a concomitant HF device other than cardiac resynchronization, such as a ventricular assist devices or cardiac contractility modulation devices;
  • Patients on heart transplant list, or patients with a heart transplant;
  • Patients with a glomerular filtration rate \<30 ml/min/m2;
  • Participation to a concomitant study evaluating management of HF decompensation, or diuretic titration.
  • Patients enable to consent.
  • Patients receiving State Medical Aid (Aide Médicale d'Etat).
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Persons benefiting from a reinforced protection, namely minors, persons deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, adults under legal protection, and finally patients in emergency situations

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (15)

University hospital of Amiens

Amiens, France

Location

University hospital of Brest

Brest, France

Location

University hospital of Caen

Caen, France

Location

University hospital of Grenoble

Grenoble, France

Location

University hospital of Lille

Lille, France

Location

La Timone University hospital

Marseille, France

Location

Hopital du Confluent

Nantes, France

Location

University hospital of Nantes

Nantes, France

Location

Georges Pompidou European hospital

Paris, France

Location

La Pitié Salpétrière

Paris, France

Location

University hospital of Poitiers

Poitiers, 86021, France

Location

University hospital of Rouen

Rouen, France

Location

Pasteur clinic

Toulouse, France

Location

University hospital of Toulouse

Toulouse, France

Location

University hospital of Tours

Tours, France

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Garcia R, Gras D, Mansourati J, Defaye P, Bisson A, Boveda S, Gandjbakhch E, Gras M, Gueffet JP, Himbert C, Jacon P, Khattar P, Lequeux B, Li A, Mansourati V, Minois D, Marijon E, Pierre B, Probst V, Degand B; HeartLogic France Cohort Study Investigators. Pre-emptive treatment of heart failure exacerbations in patients managed with the HeartLogic algorithm. ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Apr;11(2):1228-1235. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14624. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

    PMID: 38234123BACKGROUND
  • Garcia R, Gras D, Mansourati J, Defaye P, Bisson A, Boveda S, Durocher L, Gandjbakhch E, Gras M, Gueffet JP, Himbert C, Jacon P, Khattar P, Lequeux B, Li A, Mansourati V, Minois D, Marijon E, Pierre B, Ragot S, Probst V, Degand B. Impact and safety of remote monitoring of heart failure patients managed with the HeartLogic algorithm: the HeartLogic France Cohort Study. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025 Nov 13;7(2):ztaf133. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf133. eCollection 2026 Mar.

    PMID: 41624570BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2026

First Posted

April 22, 2026

Study Start

April 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2029

Last Updated

April 22, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data collected in this study will not be made available. Under the French legal and regulatory framework applicable to this research, sharing of individual-level participant data is not permitted outside the authorized study framework.

Locations