Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars
MTA
Comparative Evaluation of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Ferric Sulfate and a 2 % Chitosan Hydrogel for Primary Molar Pulpotomy: An 18- Month Randomized Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
165
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comparative Evaluation of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), Ferric Sulfate, and Chitosan Hydrogel for Primary Molar Pulpotomy: An 18-Month Randomized Controlled Trial Why is this study being done? When a child's tooth has a deep cavity, the decay can reach the soft inner part of the tooth called the pulp. A common treatment is called a pulpotomy - the dentist removes the infected part of the pulp and places a special material to protect the healthy root and save the tooth. Several materials are used for this treatment, but dentists do not yet agree on which one works best. This study compares three materials: (1) Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) - a well-known dental cement; (2) Ferric Sulfate (FS) - a liquid that stops bleeding; and (3) Chitosan Hydrogel - a new, natural gel made from shellfish shells. The goal is to find out which material keeps the treated tooth healthy for the longest time. Who can take part? Healthy children aged 5 to 8 years who have at least one baby back tooth (primary molar) that needs a pulpotomy treatment may be eligible. Children with tooth pain, swelling, infection, or teeth that are too damaged will not be included. A parent or guardian must give written permission for their child to join the study. What will happen during the study? 165 children will join the study and be randomly placed (like a coin toss) into one of three groups - each group receives a different pulpotomy material. The treatment is a routine pulpotomy done under local anesthesia (numbing injection) by an experienced pediatric dentist. After the pulpotomy material is placed, the tooth is sealed with a protective metal crown. Children will have check-up visits at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. At each visit, the dentist checks the tooth by examination and by taking a small X-ray. What are the possible risks? The risks are similar to those of any routine pulpotomy. Some children may feel mild soreness for 1 to 2 days after treatment. All three materials used in this study have been used in previous dental research. Children with shellfish allergies will be screened before enrollment. What are the possible benefits? Participating children receive free professional dental treatment and regular check-ups at no cost for 18 months. The treatment aims to save the child's baby tooth, helping with chewing, speech, and guiding permanent teeth into the right position. The results of this study will help dentists choose the best treatment for children's teeth. Is participation voluntary? Yes. Joining this study is completely voluntary. Parents and children may choose not to participate or may withdraw at any time without any effect on their future dental care. If a family does not join or decides to leave, their child will still receive standard dental treatment. How is my child's information kept private? All information collected during this study is kept strictly confidential. Children's names are replaced with codes. Only the research team can access identifiable information. Results will be published in a way that does not identify any individual child.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Mar 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 7, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2026
CompletedApril 24, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.6 years
April 7, 2026
April 21, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall Treatment Success
Overall success is defined as the simultaneous presence of clinical success AND radiographic success at the 18-month follow-up visit. Clinical success requires ALL of the following: No spontaneous pain reported by the child or parent No tenderness to percussion No soft tissue swelling or sinus tract No pathological tooth mobility (beyond normal physiologic mobility for a primary tooth) Radiographic success requires ALL of the following on a periapical radiograph: No internal pathologic root resorption No external pathologic root resorption No furcation radiolucency No periapical radiolucency No widening of the periodontal ligament space beyond normal limits A tooth is classified as a failure if it lacks either clinical success or radiographic success (or both) at the 18-month time point. Teeth that fail at any earlier visit are recorded as failures from that time onward and counted as failures at 18 months (intention-to-treat principle)
18 months post-pulpotomy
Study Arms (3)
2% Chitosan Hydrogel Arm
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm received a single pulpotomy treatment using a 2% (w/v) chitosan hydrogel as the medicament. The chitosan powder (85% deacetylated, 300-350 kDa) was dissolved in 1% acetic acid, neutralized to pH 7.0, and sterilized by gamma irradiation (25-30 kGy), yielding a hydrogel with viscosity of approximately 850 cP. After standardized coronal pulp amputation and hemostasis (saline-moistened cotton pellet for up to 5 minutes), the sterile hydrogel was applied 2-3 mm thick directly onto the pulp stumps using a syringe. No additional hemostatic or capping agent was placed over the hydrogel. The tooth was then restored with a reinforced glass ionomer base (Fuji IX GP) and a preformed stainless-steel crown. No re-application or repeat intervention was performed. The intervention was administered once at baseline (day of pulpotomy), with no further chitosan applications during follow-up.
15.5% Ferric Sulfate Solution (Astringedent®) Arm
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants in this arm received a single pulpotomy treatment using 15.5% ferric sulfate solution (Astringedent®, Ultradent) as the hemostatic and pulpotomy medicament. After standardized coronal pulp amputation and initial hemostasis (saline-moistened cotton pellet for up to 5 minutes), the ferric sulfate solution was applied directly onto the pulp stumps using a microbrush for 15 seconds, then thoroughly rinsed with sterile saline. No additional bioactive capping material was placed directly over the pulp. Over the treated pulp stumps, a layer of reinforced zinc-oxide eugenol (IRM, Dentsply) was placed as a base. The tooth was then restored with a reinforced glass ionomer base (Fuji IX GP) and a preformed stainless-steel crown. The intervention was administered once at baseline (day of pulpotomy), with no re-application of ferric sulfate during follow-up.
White ProRoot® Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm received a single pulpotomy treatment using White ProRoot® MTA (Dentsply, Maillefer, Tulsa Dental Specialties, Switzerland) as the pulpotomy medicament. After standardized coronal pulp amputation and hemostasis (saline-moistened cotton pellet for up to 5 minutes), the MTA powder was mixed with sterile water according to the manufacturer's instructions to form a putty-like consistency. The mixed MTA was then placed as a 2-3 mm thick layer directly onto the pulp stumps and gently condensed. No rinsing was performed. The material was allowed to set in the moist environment of the pulp chamber. Over the set MTA, a reinforced glass ionomer base (Fuji IX GP) was placed, followed by a preformed stainless-steel crown. The intervention was administered once at baseline (day of pulpotomy), with no re-application of MTA during follow-up.
Interventions
chitosan powder (85% deacetylated, 300-350 kDa) was dissolved in 1% acetic acid, neutralized to pH 7.0, and sterilized by gamma irradiation (25-30 kGy), yielding a hydrogel with viscosity of approximately 850 cP
White ProRoot® MTA (Dentsply, Maillefer, Tulsa Dental Specialties, Switzerland)
5.5% Ferric Sulfate Solution (Astringedent®)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 5-8 years
- At least one carious primary molar requiring pulpotomy treatment
- Vital pulp confirmed at the exposure site after caries removal
- Tooth restorable with a stainless-steel crown
- Parent or legal guardian willing and able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Non-vital pulp (no bleeding after pulp amputation)
- History of spontaneous pain (suggesting irreversible pulpitis)
- Presence of soft tissue swelling or sinus tract related to the target tooth
- Pathological tooth mobility
- Radiographic evidence of:
- Internal or external pathological root resorption
- Furcation or periapical radiolucency
- More than one-third physiological root resorption
- Any condition preventing successful stainless-steel crown placement (e.g. Insufficient coronal tooth structure)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Al-Mustansiriyah University
Baghdad, Rusafa, 10001, Iraq
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Lecturer in Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2026
First Posted
April 21, 2026
Study Start
March 1, 2024
Primary Completion
September 30, 2025
Study Completion
April 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared because the study was conducted at a single center with a relatively small sample size, and participant consent obtained did not explicitly include provisions for data sharing beyond the primary analysis. Additionally, the ethical approval (Al-Mustansiriyah University College of Dentistry Ethics Committee, REC206) did not authorize public deposition of de-identified participant data. Data are available only to the research team for verification purposes upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, subject to institutional approval.