The Hugo RAS Colorectal Collaborative
HRCC
1 other identifier
observational
2,000
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The Hugo RAS Colorectal Collaborative (HRCC) is an international, multicenter dataset of patients undergoing colorectal surgery using the Hugo RAS system. The registry aims to analyze short and long-term outcomes to provide real-world evidence on the safety and effectiveness of the system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2026
Typical duration for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2029
April 22, 2026
March 1, 2026
2.9 years
March 20, 2026
April 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (15)
Complications
Number of participants experiencing intraoperative complications, which will include the recording of robotic arm conflicts, system alarms (including red alarms), and any technical difficulties encountered.
Intraoperatively
Rate of Postoperative Complications
Number and severity of postoperative complications assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification system
Postoperatively (30-day and 90-day)
Operative Time
Total duration in minutes of the surgical procedure measured to evaluate the efficacy of the Hugo RAS system.
Intraoperatively
Blood loss
Measurement of blood loss during the surgical procedure. (ml)
Intraoperatively.
Conversion Rate
Measurement of conversion rates to open or traditional laparoscopic surgery (%)
Intraoperatively.
Length of Hospital Stay
Total length (days) of patient hospital stay post-surgery.
At discharge, assessed up to 90 days post-surgery
Hospital Readmission Rate
Rate of hospital readmissions following discharge.
Up to 90 days post-surgery
Pathological Outcomes: Margin Status and Lymph Node Yield
Assessment of pathological outcomes, specifically evaluating margin status and lymph node yield.
Up to 30 days post-surgery
Disease Recurrence Rate
Monitoring of disease recurrence rates post-surgery.
Up to 5 years post-surgery
Overall and Disease-Free Survival
Collection of survival data, specifically overall survival and disease-free survival rates.
Up to 5 years post-surgery
Long-term Functional Outcomes
Assessment of long-term functional outcomes, such as bowel function.
Long-term follow-up (e.g., 1 year, 3 years post-surgery).
Bowel Function Assessed by the LARS Score
Bowel function will be evaluated using the unabbreviated Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 42. A score of 0 to 20 indicates no LARS, 21 to 29 indicates minor LARS, and 30 to 42 indicates major LARS. Higher scores indicate worse bowel function and a worse outcome.
Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years post-surgery
Fecal Incontinence Assessed by the Wexner Scale
Fecal incontinence will be evaluated using the Cleveland Clinic (Wexner) Fecal Incontinence Score. The scale assesses the frequency of different types of incontinence and lifestyle alterations. The total score ranges from 0 to 20, where 0 represents perfect continence and 20 represents complete incontinence. Higher scores indicate more severe incontinence and a worse outcome.
Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years post-surgery
Quality of Life Assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30
Quality of life will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). All scale and single-item measures are linearly transformed to a score ranging from 0 to 100. For the global health status and functional scales, a higher score represents a better level of functioning and a better quality of life. For the symptom scales and items, a higher score represents a higher level of symptomatology and a worse quality of life.
Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years post-surgery
Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by the EQ-5D-3L
Health status will be evaluated using the EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire. This tool consists of a descriptive system and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The descriptive system assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, which are converted into a single health utility index score (typically ranging from less than 0 to 1.0, where 1.0 represents full health). The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100. For both the index score and the VAS, higher scores indicate a better health status and a better outcome.
Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years post-surgery
Study Arms (1)
Patients undergoing Hugo RAS colorectal surgery
Adult patients (≥18 years) scheduled to undergo any type of elective or emergent colorectal surgery utilizing the Hugo™ RAS (Robotic-Assisted Surgery) System at participating high-volume colorectal surgery centers. The intervention of interest is the use of the Hugo RAS System, a medical device manufactured by Medtronic, which consists of a surgeon console, robotic arms with instrument manipulators, and a vision cart. The system is intended for performing minimally invasive colorectal surgical procedures. Because this is an observational study, patients will receive treatment according to the standard clinical practice of the participating centers.
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing any type of elective or emergent colorectal surgery using the Hugo RAS system. The population will be drawn from participating high-volume colorectal surgery centers across multiple countries. All eligible patients at these centers will be enrolled to minimize selection bias.
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years)
- Scheduled to undergo any type of colorectal surgery (elective or emergent) where the Hugo RAS system is planned to be used
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients unable to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Romero-Marcos JM, Sampson-Davila JG, Cuenca-Gomez C, Altet-Torne J, Gonzalez-Abos S, Ojeda-Jimenez I, Galaviz-Sosa ML, Delgado-Rivilla S. Colorectal procedures with the novel Hugo RAS system: training process and case series report from a non-robotic surgical team. Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2160-2168. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10760-8. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
PMID: 38448626BACKGROUNDRottoli M, Violante T, Calini G, Cardelli S, Novelli M, Poggioli G. A multi-docking strategy for robotic LAR and deep pelvic surgery with the Hugo RAS system: experience from a tertiary referral center. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Oct 1;39(1):154. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04728-2.
PMID: 39349880BACKGROUNDCheng CL, Rezac C. The role of robotics in colorectal surgery. BMJ. 2018 Feb 12;360:j5304. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5304.
PMID: 29440057BACKGROUNDIrani JL, Hedrick TL, Miller TE, Lee L, Steinhagen E, Shogan BD, Goldberg JE, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM. Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):5-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09758-x. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
PMID: 36515747BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Target Duration
- 3 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2026
First Posted
April 21, 2026
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2029
Last Updated
April 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Requests for access to anonymized individual patient-level data by external researchers will be considered on a case-by-case basis by the HRCC steering committee. A formal data sharing agreement outlining the terms of use, data security, and publication policies will be required. The primary aim is to protect patient confidentiality and ensure that data is used responsibly for advancing scientific knowledge in line with the registry's objectives.