NCT07541352

Brief Summary

The Hugo RAS Colorectal Collaborative (HRCC) is an international, multicenter dataset of patients undergoing colorectal surgery using the Hugo RAS system. The registry aims to analyze short and long-term outcomes to provide real-world evidence on the safety and effectiveness of the system.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
38mo left

Started Apr 2026

Typical duration for all trials

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress3%
Apr 2026Jun 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2026

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2026

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 21, 2026

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2029

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2029

Last Updated

April 22, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 20, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Colorectal cancerIBDRobotic surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (15)

  • Complications

    Number of participants experiencing intraoperative complications, which will include the recording of robotic arm conflicts, system alarms (including red alarms), and any technical difficulties encountered.

    Intraoperatively

  • Rate of Postoperative Complications

    Number and severity of postoperative complications assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification system

    Postoperatively (30-day and 90-day)

  • Operative Time

    Total duration in minutes of the surgical procedure measured to evaluate the efficacy of the Hugo RAS system.

    Intraoperatively

  • Blood loss

    Measurement of blood loss during the surgical procedure. (ml)

    Intraoperatively.

  • Conversion Rate

    Measurement of conversion rates to open or traditional laparoscopic surgery (%)

    Intraoperatively.

  • Length of Hospital Stay

    Total length (days) of patient hospital stay post-surgery.

    At discharge, assessed up to 90 days post-surgery

  • Hospital Readmission Rate

    Rate of hospital readmissions following discharge.

    Up to 90 days post-surgery

  • Pathological Outcomes: Margin Status and Lymph Node Yield

    Assessment of pathological outcomes, specifically evaluating margin status and lymph node yield.

    Up to 30 days post-surgery

  • Disease Recurrence Rate

    Monitoring of disease recurrence rates post-surgery.

    Up to 5 years post-surgery

  • Overall and Disease-Free Survival

    Collection of survival data, specifically overall survival and disease-free survival rates.

    Up to 5 years post-surgery

  • Long-term Functional Outcomes

    Assessment of long-term functional outcomes, such as bowel function.

    Long-term follow-up (e.g., 1 year, 3 years post-surgery).

  • Bowel Function Assessed by the LARS Score

    Bowel function will be evaluated using the unabbreviated Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 42. A score of 0 to 20 indicates no LARS, 21 to 29 indicates minor LARS, and 30 to 42 indicates major LARS. Higher scores indicate worse bowel function and a worse outcome.

    Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years post-surgery

  • Fecal Incontinence Assessed by the Wexner Scale

    Fecal incontinence will be evaluated using the Cleveland Clinic (Wexner) Fecal Incontinence Score. The scale assesses the frequency of different types of incontinence and lifestyle alterations. The total score ranges from 0 to 20, where 0 represents perfect continence and 20 represents complete incontinence. Higher scores indicate more severe incontinence and a worse outcome.

    Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years post-surgery

  • Quality of Life Assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30

    Quality of life will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). All scale and single-item measures are linearly transformed to a score ranging from 0 to 100. For the global health status and functional scales, a higher score represents a better level of functioning and a better quality of life. For the symptom scales and items, a higher score represents a higher level of symptomatology and a worse quality of life.

    Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years post-surgery

  • Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by the EQ-5D-3L

    Health status will be evaluated using the EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire. This tool consists of a descriptive system and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The descriptive system assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, which are converted into a single health utility index score (typically ranging from less than 0 to 1.0, where 1.0 represents full health). The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100. For both the index score and the VAS, higher scores indicate a better health status and a better outcome.

    Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years post-surgery

Study Arms (1)

Patients undergoing Hugo RAS colorectal surgery

Adult patients (≥18 years) scheduled to undergo any type of elective or emergent colorectal surgery utilizing the Hugo™ RAS (Robotic-Assisted Surgery) System at participating high-volume colorectal surgery centers. The intervention of interest is the use of the Hugo RAS System, a medical device manufactured by Medtronic, which consists of a surgeon console, robotic arms with instrument manipulators, and a vision cart. The system is intended for performing minimally invasive colorectal surgical procedures. Because this is an observational study, patients will receive treatment according to the standard clinical practice of the participating centers.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing any type of elective or emergent colorectal surgery using the Hugo RAS system. The population will be drawn from participating high-volume colorectal surgery centers across multiple countries. All eligible patients at these centers will be enrolled to minimize selection bias.

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years)
  • Scheduled to undergo any type of colorectal surgery (elective or emergent) where the Hugo RAS system is planned to be used
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients unable to provide informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (4)

  • Romero-Marcos JM, Sampson-Davila JG, Cuenca-Gomez C, Altet-Torne J, Gonzalez-Abos S, Ojeda-Jimenez I, Galaviz-Sosa ML, Delgado-Rivilla S. Colorectal procedures with the novel Hugo RAS system: training process and case series report from a non-robotic surgical team. Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2160-2168. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10760-8. Epub 2024 Mar 6.

    PMID: 38448626BACKGROUND
  • Rottoli M, Violante T, Calini G, Cardelli S, Novelli M, Poggioli G. A multi-docking strategy for robotic LAR and deep pelvic surgery with the Hugo RAS system: experience from a tertiary referral center. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Oct 1;39(1):154. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04728-2.

    PMID: 39349880BACKGROUND
  • Cheng CL, Rezac C. The role of robotics in colorectal surgery. BMJ. 2018 Feb 12;360:j5304. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5304.

    PMID: 29440057BACKGROUND
  • Irani JL, Hedrick TL, Miller TE, Lee L, Steinhagen E, Shogan BD, Goldberg JE, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM. Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):5-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09758-x. Epub 2022 Dec 14.

    PMID: 36515747BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal NeoplasmsInflammatory Bowel Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal DiseasesGastroenteritis

Central Study Contacts

Matteo Rottoli, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Target Duration
3 Years
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2026

First Posted

April 21, 2026

Study Start

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Last Updated

April 22, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Requests for access to anonymized individual patient-level data by external researchers will be considered on a case-by-case basis by the HRCC steering committee. A formal data sharing agreement outlining the terms of use, data security, and publication policies will be required. The primary aim is to protect patient confidentiality and ensure that data is used responsibly for advancing scientific knowledge in line with the registry's objectives.