NCT07540806

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to determine if a newer tenotomy technique utilizing an ultrasound needle is more effective than the traditional tenotomy technique utilizing a simple hypodermic needle for gluteal tendinosis. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. 1.Is pain from the gluteal tendinosis improved with either technique, and, if so, is there a difference in the improvement between techniques?
  2. 2.Is there an improvement in function for gluteal tendinosis, and, if so, is there a difference between techniques?

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
110

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
22mo left

Started Jun 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 14, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 20, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2026

Expected
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2027

4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2028

Last Updated

April 20, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

April 14, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 14, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

TendinopathyTendinosisGluteal tendinosisTenotomyPercutaneous needle tenotomyPercutaneous ultrasonic tenotomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from baseline in pain, as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The VAS measures the severity of pain. Scores range from 0 to 100 mm line with 0 representing no pain and 100 representing the worst pain imaginable.

    Baseline and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 4 months post-procedure.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from baseline in physical function, as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function grading scale for activities of daily living (ADLs)

    Baseline and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 4 months post-procedure.

Study Arms (2)

Percutaneous needle tenotomy (PNT)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Traditional tenotomy technique utilizing a hypodermic needle.

Procedure: Percutaneous needle tenotomy (PNT)

Percutaneous ultrasonic tenotomy (PUT, Tenex device)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Tenotomy utilizing a mechanized ultrasonic device to perform the procedure (Tenex)

Device: Percutaneous ultrasonic tenotomy (PUT, Tenex Device)

Interventions

Utilization of a traditional tenotomy technique (PNT) to treat gluteal tendinosis

Percutaneous needle tenotomy (PNT)

Utilization of ultrasonic tenotomy technique (PUT) to treat gluteal tendinosis

Percutaneous ultrasonic tenotomy (PUT, Tenex device)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of gluteal (medius and/or minimus) tendinosis confirmed clinically and with ultrasonography or MRI
  • Failure to improve after 3 months of nonoperative treatment
  • Symptoms present for longer than 3 months

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with concomitant injuries or pain
  • Full thickness tears of the affected tendon
  • Prior corticosteroid injection of the affected tendon within the last 3 months
  • Prior PNT of the affected tendon
  • Significant abnormalities of bony or tendon morphology

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UCHealth CU Sports Medicine - Colorado Center

Denver, Colorado, 80222, United States

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Yelin E, Weinstein S, King T. The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Dec;46(3):259-260. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 26. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27519477BACKGROUND
  • Millar NL, Silbernagel KG, Thorborg K, Kirwan PD, Galatz LM, Abrams GD, Murrell GAC, McInnes IB, Rodeo SA. Tendinopathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Jan 7;7(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00234-1.

    PMID: 33414454BACKGROUND
  • Hurley ET, Mojica ES, Kanakamedala AC, Meislin RJ, Strauss EJ, Campbell KA, Alaia MJ. Quadriceps tendon has a lower re-rupture rate than hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - A meta-analysis. J ISAKOS. 2022 Apr;7(2):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2021.10.001. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

    PMID: 35543668BACKGROUND
  • Zhou Y, Wang JH. PRP Treatment Efficacy for Tendinopathy: A Review of Basic Science Studies. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9103792. doi: 10.1155/2016/9103792. Epub 2016 Aug 16.

    PMID: 27610386BACKGROUND
  • Smallcomb M, Khandare S, Vidt ME, Simon JC. Therapeutic Ultrasound and Shockwave Therapy for Tendinopathy: A Narrative Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Aug 1;101(8):801-807. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001894. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

    PMID: 35859290BACKGROUND
  • Shomal Zadeh F, Shafiei M, Hosseini N, Alipour E, Cheung H, Chalian M. The effectiveness of percutaneous ultrasound-guided needle tenotomy compared to alternative treatments for chronic tendinopathy: a systematic review. Skeletal Radiol. 2023 May;52(5):875-888. doi: 10.1007/s00256-022-04140-3. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

    PMID: 35896736BACKGROUND
  • Finnoff JT, Fowler SP, Lai JK, Santrach PJ, Willis EA, Sayeed YA, Smith J. Treatment of chronic tendinopathy with ultrasound-guided needle tenotomy and platelet-rich plasma injection. PM R. 2011 Oct;3(10):900-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.05.015. Epub 2011 Aug 26.

    PMID: 21872551BACKGROUND
  • McShane JM, Shah VN, Nazarian LN. Sonographically guided percutaneous needle tenotomy for treatment of common extensor tendinosis in the elbow: is a corticosteroid necessary? J Ultrasound Med. 2008 Aug;27(8):1137-44. doi: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.8.1137.

    PMID: 18645071BACKGROUND
  • Lakhey S, Mansfield M, Pradhan RL, Rijal KP, Paney BP, Manandhar RR. Percutaneous extensor tenotomy for chronic tennis elbow using an 18G needle. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2007 Oct-Dec;5(4):446-8.

    PMID: 18604073BACKGROUND
  • Bradberry DM, Sussman WI, Mautner KR. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Needle Tenotomy for Chronic Tensor Fascia Lata Tendinopathy: A Case Series and Description of Sonographic Findings. PM R. 2018 Sep;10(9):979-983. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

    PMID: 29428875BACKGROUND
  • Maag L, Linder S, Hackett L, Mitchkash M, Farley T, Lamar D, Fisher N, Burnham B. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Needle Tenotomy for Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review. Sports Health. 2025 Jul;17(4):834-842. doi: 10.1177/19417381241275659. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

    PMID: 39238190BACKGROUND
  • Wahezi SE, Patel A, Yerra S, Naeimi T, Sayed D, Oakes D, Ortiz N, Yee M, Yih C, Sitapara K, Schulz J, Kohan L, Rosenburg J, Schwechter E, Chan F, Gonzalez D, Baker C. Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Tenotomy of the Iliotibial Band for Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Longitudinal Observational Study With One-Year Durability Results. Pain Physician. 2023 Jul;26(4):393-401.

    PMID: 37535779BACKGROUND
  • Jacobson JA, Yablon CM, Henning PT, Kazmers IS, Urquhart A, Hallstrom B, Bedi A, Parameswaran A. Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: Percutaneous Tendon Fenestration Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for Treatment of Gluteal Tendinosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Nov;35(11):2413-2420. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.11046. Epub 2016 Sep 23.

    PMID: 27663654BACKGROUND
  • Kirschner JS, Cheng J, Hurwitz N, Santiago K, Lin E, Beatty N, Kingsbury D, Wendel I, Milani C. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle tenotomy (PNT) alone versus PNT plus platelet-rich plasma injection for the treatment of chronic tendinosis: A randomized controlled trial. PM R. 2021 Dec;13(12):1340-1349. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12583. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

    PMID: 33644963BACKGROUND
  • Baker CL Jr, Mahoney JR. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Tenotomy for Gluteal Tendinopathy. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Mar 19;8(3):2325967120907868. doi: 10.1177/2325967120907868. eCollection 2020 Mar.

    PMID: 32232066BACKGROUND
  • Gaspar MP, Motto MA, Lewis S, Jacoby SM, Culp RW, Lee Osterman A, Kane PM. Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection With Percutaneous Needling for Recalcitrant Lateral Epicondylitis: Comparison of Tenotomy and Fenestration Techniques. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Dec 6;5(12):2325967117742077. doi: 10.1177/2325967117742077. eCollection 2017 Dec.

    PMID: 29238734BACKGROUND
  • Carlier Y, Bonichon F, Peuchant A. Recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis: Early results with a new technique combining ultrasonographic percutaneous tenotomy with platelet-rich plasma injection. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Apr;107(2):102604. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.03.016. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

    PMID: 33358122BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tendinopathy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesTendon InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Kyle V Goerl, MD

    University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

David Vargas

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2026

First Posted

April 20, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2028

Last Updated

April 20, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations