NCT07538492

Brief Summary

This study aims to validate the clinical performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based automatic assessment system for the G-FAST score. The core comparison is the consistency and accuracy between AI-generated G-FAST results and standardized manual G-FAST assessments performed by trained professionals. The goal is to provide a convenient, efficient, and objective tool for acute stroke screening and early identification, reduce the subjective variability of manual scoring, and optimize the pre-hospital and in-hospital stroke assessment workflow.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
297

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
32mo left

Started Apr 2026

Typical duration for all trials

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress3%
Apr 2026Dec 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 7, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 10, 2026

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 20, 2026

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2028

Last Updated

April 20, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

April 7, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 15, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Artificial IntelligenceG-FAST

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Agreement between AI-generated and physician-scored G-FAST scale assessments

    The agreement between the scores generated by the artificial intelligence (AI) system and the scores assigned by neurologists on G-FAST scale will be evaluated using weighted Kappa coefficients.

    within 7 days of acute stroke onset

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Agreement of AI System vs. Neurologists in Binary G-FAST Classification (Score ≥3 vs. <3)

    within 7 days of acute stroke onset

  • Bland-Altman Agreement Limit Analysis

    within 7 days of acute stroke onset

  • Diagnostic performance analysis

    within 7 days of acute stroke onset

Study Arms (2)

AI-first interview group

Participants first undergo G-FAST assessment by AI, followed by G-FAST assessment by human assessors.

Human-first group

Participants first undergo G-FAST assessment by human assessors, followed by G-FAST assessment by AI.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with acute ischemic stroke who undergo G-FAST scale assessments using both AI and manual methods.

You may qualify if:

  • Aged ≥ 18 years, of either sex.
  • Clinically diagnosed with stroke, and confirmed by cranial CT/MRI to have ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.
  • Onset within 7 days.
  • Alert and oriented, able to cooperate with standardized video and audio data collection.
  • The patient or their legally authorized representative understands the study and voluntarily provides written informed consent (including consent for audio-visual data collection).

You may not qualify if:

  • Neurological deficits caused by non-stroke etiologies (e.g., brain tumor, traumatic brain injury, encephalitis).
  • Patients with impaired consciousness, severe cognitive dysfunction, or psychiatric disorders that prevent cooperation with video collection and scale assessment.
  • Patients with severe visual or hearing impairment, or global aphasia, who are unable to follow instructions.
  • Critically ill patients requiring immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation or endotracheal intubation, making video and audio data collection impossible.
  • Patients with severe facial or limb deformities, or large-area dressings that severely interfere with camera data collection.
  • Patients with unilateral or bilateral upper limb amputation, severe deformity, unhealed fracture, joint fixation, or severe contracture.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Qingfeng Ma, MD

    Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Qingfeng Ma, MD

CONTACT

Zixin Wang, MD Candidate

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2026

First Posted

April 20, 2026

Study Start

April 10, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Last Updated

April 20, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Due to the protection of participant privacy and institutional review board requirements, individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly.