Deep Learning Framework for Continuous Depth of Anesthesia Forecasting
Validation of a Deep Learning Framework for Continuous Forecasting of Pharmacodynamic Responses and Physiological Trajectories During General Anesthesia
1 other identifier
observational
115
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in anesthesiology offers the potential to shift patient monitoring from reactive to predictive. Deep learning architectures, specifically Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, excel at processing complex, time-series data to forecast future clinical states. While standard PK/PD models (such as the state of the art Eleveld model for Propofol and Remifentanil) estimate target-site drug concentrations (Ce), they do not account for real-time, patient-specific dynamic responses. This study aims to deploy an AI framework designed to predict future physiological states.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2026
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2026
April 17, 2026
March 1, 2026
2 months
April 2, 2026
April 10, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Calibration error of the predictive uncertainty cone
Calibration error of the predictive uncertainty cone - Calibration error of the predictive uncertainty cone is the discrepancy between a model's stated confidence level (e.g., predicting that 95% of future values will fall within a specific range) and the actual frequency with which the true values actually land inside that predicted boundary.
Continuous - Perioperative
Mean Absolute Error (MAE)
Mean Absolute Error (MAE)
Continuous - perioperative
Trend accuracy
Trend accuracy measures a predictive model's ability to correctly forecast the future direction and rate of change of a variable (such as whether a patient's anesthesia depth is actively lightening or deepening), independent of the absolute numerical error at any single point in time.
Continuous - perioperative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)
Continuous - perioperative
Study Arms (2)
Prospective
Prospective Cohort
Restrospective
Retrospective Cohort
Eligibility Criteria
Patients undergoing general anesthesia under continuous depth of anesthesia monitoring.
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia.
- Procedures requiring continuous depth of anesthesia monitoring (BIS).
You may not qualify if:
- \- Procedures where the primary anesthetic plan does not involve continuous electronic data capture.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussellead
- AZ Sint-Jan AVcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
AZ Sint-Jan AV
Bruges, 8000, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2026
First Posted
April 17, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03