Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to verify that BulbiCAM®, a video-oculography medical device, gives similar results regardless of the Operating System (OS) used. The study compares three platforms: Windows, Linux Ubuntu, and Linux NixOS.

Trial Health

Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date

Enrollment

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline

Completed

Started Apr 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach

1 country

1 active site

Status

enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

1 month study duration

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 25, 2026

Completed

7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2026

Completed

14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 15, 2026

Completed

23 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 8, 2026

Completed

Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 8, 2026

Completed

Last Updated

May 11, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 6, 2026

Conditions

Healhty

Keywords

video-oculographyhealthy control

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (30)

No statistical difference between acuracy of horizontal pro-saccades when comparing the three platforms
unit: %
single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between peak velocity of horizontal pro-saccades when comparing the three platforms
unit: degree/s
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between acuracy of multidirectional pro-saccades when comparing the three platforms
Unit: %
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between peak velocity of multidirectional pro-saccades when comparing the three platforms
unit: degree/s
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between contrast sensitivity results when comparing the three platforms
unit: Pelli-Robson
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between variable strobe test results when comparing the three platforms
unit: Pelli-Robson
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between strobe contrast sensitivity results when comparing the three platforms
unit: Pelli-Robson
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between RAPD test result when comparing the three platforms
no unit
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between ptosis MRD1 and 2 when comparing the three platforms
unit mm
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between duration of fixation when comparing the three platforms
Unit: ms
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between the amplitude of intrusive saccades when comparing the three platforms
Unit: degree
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between the peak velocity of intrusive saccades when comparing the three platforms
unit: degree/s
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between the mean fixation time when comparing the three platforms
unit: ms
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between mean pupil size when comparing the three platforms
unit: mm
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between anti-saccade amplitudes when comparing the three platforms
unit: degree
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between anti-saccades peak velocity when comparing the three platforms
unit: degree/s
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between memory saccades accuracy when comparing the three platforms
unit: %
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between number of errors in memory saccades task when comparing the three platforms
no unit
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between memory saccades latencies when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: ms
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between anti saccades latencies when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: ms
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between saccadic reaction time in visual field test when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: ms
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between pupil area when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: mm\*s
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between pupil diameters when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: mm
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between pupil contraction latencies when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: ms
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between peak velocity of pupil dilation when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: mm/s
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between multidirectional pro-saccade latencies when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: ms
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between horizontal pro-saccades latencies when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: ms
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between smooth pursuit gain when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: %
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between the calibration ratio when comparing the three platforms
no unit
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between pursuit acuity results when comparing Windows versus NixOS platforms
unit: LogMAR
Single visit at enrollment

Secondary Outcomes (20)

No statistical difference between pupil areas when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement, modified stimulus and timing calibration
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between pupil diameters when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement, modified stimulus and timing calibration
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between latency of pupil contraction when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement, modified stimulus and timing calibration
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between smooth pursuit gain when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between horizontal pro-saccade latency when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
Single visit at enrollment
+15 more secondary outcomes