Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement Versus Neurodynamic Mobilization in Lumbar Radiculopathy
Effectiveness of Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement Versus Neurodynamic Mobilization in Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Low back pain with lumbar radiculopathy is a common condition that significantly affects functional ability and quality of life. Manual therapy is widely used as a first-line treatment to reduce pain and improve mobility. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of spinal mobilization with leg movement (SMWLM) and neurodynamic mobilization in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. A total of 20 participants were randomly assigned into two groups. One group received SMWLM, while the other group received neurodynamic mobilization of the sciatic nerve over a treatment period of six weeks. Outcomes included pain intensity, quality of life, and hip range of motion. The results of this study aim to identify the more effective intervention for improving clinical outcomes in patients with lumbar radiculopathy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 10, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 6, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2026
CompletedApril 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
4 months
April 6, 2026
April 6, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)
Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain, and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment
Functional Disability (Oswestry Disability Index)
Functional disability was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which evaluates limitations in daily activities due to low back pain.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment
Hip Range of Motion
Hip range of motion was measured using a universal goniometer to assess improvements in joint mobility.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment
Study Arms (2)
Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group received spinal mobilization with leg movement (SMWLM) based on the Mulligan concept to improve spinal mobility, reduce pain, and enhance functional performance.
Neurodynamic Mobilization Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group received neurodynamic mobilization targeting the sciatic nerve to improve neural mobility and reduce pain associated with lumbar radiculopathy.
Interventions
This intervention involves applying sustained accessory spinal mobilization combined with active or passive leg movement to improve joint mechanics, reduce nerve compression, and enhance mobility.
Neurodynamic mobilization techniques were applied to mobilize the sciatic nerve and surrounding tissues to restore neural function, reduce tension, and improve mobility.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 25 and 50 years
- Male and female participants
- Clinically diagnosed low back pain with lumbar radiculopathy for at least 3 months
- Symptoms radiating below the knee along the sciatic nerve distribution
You may not qualify if:
- History of lumbar spine surgery or laminectomy
- Spinal fractures, tumors, or inflammatory disorders
- Acute disc prolapse or lumbar instability
- Lower limb vascular disease
- Neurological disorders
- Piriformis syndrome
- Manual therapy within the last 6 months
- Hip pathology or hamstring tightness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Deraya university, faculty of physical therapy
Minya, Menia Governorate, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- This study was single-blinded where participants and investigators were not fully aware of group allocation details to minimize bias.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 6, 2026
First Posted
April 13, 2026
Study Start
October 10, 2025
Primary Completion
January 31, 2026
Study Completion
January 31, 2026
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share