To Compare the Two Implant Placement Protocols to Evaluate Placement Accuracy and Post-operative Healing of the Implant
Assessment of Two Implant Placement Protocols to Evaluate Placement Accuracy and Post-Operative Healing
2 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to evaluate two commonly utilized surgical guide protocols to determine dental implant placement accuracy compared to pre-operative computerized planning, post-operative healing and bone levels to 12-months post-placement, and patient assessed post-operative discomfort and healing using a visual acuity scale (VAS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2028
June 25, 2026
June 1, 2026
11 months
March 30, 2026
June 22, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Implant placement deviation from computerized planning
Implant placement deviation from computerized planning at 12-month post-placement using CBCT overlay measurement techniques.
12 months
Radiographic marginal bone loss
Radiographic marginal bone loss as measured using digital measurement tools and calibrated parallel two-dimensional radiographic images from baseline dental implant placement to 12-months post-implant placement
From baseline to 12 months
Patient centered outcomes using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS
Patient centered outcomes including pain, bleeding, swelling, change in daily activities at 7, 14, and 30 days postoperatively, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) This measurement ranges from 0-10 (0 being better and 10 being worse).
4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Pilot Drill Guide (PDG)
ACTIVE COMPARATORMatrix-based pilot drill guides fabricated using casts derived from digital wax ups of the proposed final restoration based upon initial implant planning and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol.
Fully Guided (FG
EXPERIMENTAL3-D printed guides fabricated based upon digital wax ups and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol and guided implant placement kits
Interventions
Matrix-based pilot drill guides fabricated using casts derived from digital wax ups of the proposed final restoration based upon initial implant planning and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol.
3-D printed guides fabricated based upon digital wax ups and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol and guided implant placement kits.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English speaking
- At least 18 years old
- Must be a patient of the UAB Dental School
- Able to read and understand informed consent document
- Patients presenting with a single edentulous site planned for dental implant placement
- Presence of periodontally healthy, non-carious neighboring teeth and/or healthy restored dental implants on either side of edentulous site planned for dental implant placement.
- No anticipated need for surgical and/or endodontic care at teeth adjacent to the proposed surgical site during the study period.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-English speaking
- Less than 18 years old
- Smokers/tobacco users (\>10 cigarettes/day)
- Patients with systemic pathologies or conditions contraindicating oral surgical procedures or adversely affecting wound healing
- Absence of adjacent teeth/implants on either side of the tooth to be extracted and/or edentulous sites where 2 or more adjacent implants are planned.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-0007, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maria L Geisinger, DDS, MS
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chair, Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2026
First Posted
April 6, 2026
Study Start
August 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2028
Last Updated
June 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data from this study will not be shared with other researchers outside of our research team.