Immediate vs Conventional Loading for Early Implant Placement
Immediate Vs. Conventional Loading for Early Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone of Maxilla: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to assess clinical, radiological and patient centred outcomes of immediate and conventional implant loading protocols, and to compare clinical outcomes of these two different loading protocols (immediate and conventional) in combination with early implant placement of single implants in the esthetic zone of maxilla.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2027
July 29, 2024
July 1, 2024
2.9 years
July 16, 2024
July 27, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Marginal bone level changes
Marginal bone level will be monitored using periapical radiographs taken with paralleling technique, using custom silicone holder fabricated for each patient. X-rays will be taken on the day of the provisional restoration placement, final restoration placement, and one year after final restoration.
1 year
Pink esthetic score
Esthetic outcome for the peri-implant mucosa will be assessed from the photographs taken at the definitive restoration delivery and 1 year follow-up visit. Seven variables (mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft-tissue level, soft- tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft-tissue color and texture) are assessed with a score 0, 1 or 2. Highest possible score is 14.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Implant survival
1 year
Facial bone wall width
1 year
Alveolar ridge volume
1 year
Patient satisfaction
1 year
Impact of oral health on patient's quality of life
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Test group (Early implant placement + immediate provisionalization)
EXPERIMENTALPatients in test group receive an implant 6 to 8 weeks following tooth extraction with immediate provisional restoration
Control group (Early implant placement + delayed loading)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in control group receive an implant 6 to 8 weeks following tooth extraction with submerged healing and conventional loading
Interventions
Implants placed following early implant placement protocol with soft tissue healing (6-8 weeks after tooth extraction). GBR procedure performed together with implant placement. Immediate provisional restoration will be delivered.
Implants placed following early implant placement protocol with soft tissue healing (6-8 weeks after tooth extraction). GBR procedure performed together with implant placement. Delayed loading protocol followed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Single failing tooth in the esthetic zone of maxilla (second premolar to second premolar)
- Patients older than 18 years
- Healthy patients ASA I and II
- Non-smokers/Light smokers (\<10 cigarettes per day)
- Adequate bone volume apical and palatal to the failing tooth to allow for sufficient primary - implant stability of regular diameter implant
You may not qualify if:
- Implants adjacent to the failing teeth
- Active periodontal infection
- Severe bruxism
- Systemic or local conditions that contraindicates dental implant surgery - Heavy smokers (\>10 cigarettes per day)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Implant Center, School of Dental Medicine, Univeristy of Blegrade
Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aleksa Markovic, Professor
Chair of Implant Center, School of Dental Medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 16, 2024
First Posted
July 29, 2024
Study Start
March 29, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Last Updated
July 29, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share