The Role of NaV1.8 in Human Pain Models
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to understand how NaV1.8, a specific type of sodium channel found in peripheral nerves, contributes to different types of pain in humans. To address this, suzetrigine, a highly selective blocker of the NaV1.8 channel, is used. While current pain medications often have side effects that limit their use, NaV1.8 is a promising target for new, non-opioid pain treatments because it is primarily located in the nerves that send pain signals to the brain. This study is a randomised, placebo-controlled double-blind crossover microdosing trial. This means that very small, safe amounts of the drug are injected directly into the skin of healthy volunteers to observe its effects locally. This approach ensures the drug works only at the injection site with negligible exposure to the rest of the body. Healthy volunteers will undergo six different types of brief, controlled pain tests to see which ones are reduced by blocking NaV1.8. These tests are as follows:
- Electrical stimulation: Brief electrical pulses delivered onto the skin.
- Mechanical stimulation: A standardised "pin-prick" stimulation of the skin.
- Chemical stimulation: An injection of fluid containing capsaicin (the active component of chilli peppers) superficially into the skin.
- Heat stimulation: An injection of hot fluid superficially into the skin.
- Cold stimulation: An injection of cold fluid superficially into the skin.
- Acid stimulation: An injection of acidic fluid superficially into the skin. By comparing the effects of suzetrigine against a placebo and a standard local anaesthetic (lidocaine), the study will help determine which specific pain modalities critically depend on NaV1.8.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for early_phase_1 pain
Started Apr 2026
Shorter than P25 for early_phase_1 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 21, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 12, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 12, 2026
April 30, 2026
April 1, 2026
6 months
March 28, 2026
April 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Pain Intensity: Electrical stimulation
Metric: Numerical Rating Scale (0-100; 0=No pain, 100=Worst imaginable pain). Calculation: The average of all provided pain ratings divided by the number of delivered stimuli (maximum of 23 stimuli). If a subject stops the test upon reaching a rating of 30, the average is calculated based on the actual number of stimuli delivered.
1.5 minutes post-injection.
Geometric Mean Pain Intensity: Mechanical stimulation
Metric: Numerical Rating Scale (0-100; 0=No pain, 100=Worst imaginable pain). Calculation: The geometric mean of the pain ratings recorded from three standardized mechanical stimuli (3.6N force).
1.5 minutes post-injection.
Area Under the Curve (AUC): Capsaicin injection
Metric: Numerical Rating Scale (0-100; 0=No pain, 100=Worst imaginable pain). Calculation: The AUC of pain ratings provided every 5 seconds, starting from the time of injection until a consecutive rating of 0 is maintained for 30 seconds.
From injection until 0 pain for 30 seconds.
Area Under the Curve (AUC): Acid injection
Metric: Numerical Rating Scale (0-100; 0=No pain, 100=Worst imaginable pain). Calculation: The AUC of pain ratings provided every 5 seconds during the pH decrease from 7.2 to 5.4.
110 seconds
Area Under the Curve (AUC): Heat injection
Metric: Numerical Rating Scale (0-100; 0=No pain, 100=Worst imaginable pain). Calculation: The AUC of pain ratings provided every 5 seconds during the temperature increase from 23°C to 52°C.
150 seconds
Area Under the Curve (AUC): Cold injection
Metric: Numerical Rating Scale (0-100; 0=No pain, 100=Worst imaginable pain). Calculation: The AUC of pain ratings provided every 5 seconds during the temperature decrease from 23°C to 4°C.
150 seconds
Study Arms (3)
Suzetrigine
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive intracutaneous injections of suzetrigine at a concentration of 1 µM before or during experimental pain induction across six different modalities (electrical, mechanical, capsaicin, acid, heat, and cold).
Lidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants receive intracutaneous injections of lidocaine (positive control) at a concentration of 2 mM before or during experimental pain induction across three out of six different modalities (electrical, mechanical, capsaicin).
Control solution
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants receive intracutaneous injections of control solution (negative control) before or during experimental pain induction across six different modalities (electrical, mechanical, capsaicin, heat, and cold).
Interventions
A selective NaV1.8 inhibitor. It is administered at a concentration of 1 µM via intracutaneous injection at the site of pain induction. The total dose per subject is 1.53 µg.
A non-selective NaV inhibitor. It is administered at a concentration of 2 mM via intracutaneous injection at the site of pain induction. The total dose per subject is 120 µg.
A control solution mimicking extracellular fluid. It is administered via intracutaneous injection at the site of pain induction.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 70 years
You may not qualify if:
- Participant of another study, ongoing or within the last 4 weeks
- Medication intake (except contraception) or drug abuse
- Female subjects: Positive pregnancy test or breastfeeding
- Verified body temperature above 38°C
- Known allergic diseases, in particular asthmatic disorders
- Limited accessibility of forearms (e.g. orthopedic cast)
- Sensory deficit, skin disease or hematoma at the forarms
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, State of Vienna, 1090, Austria
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael J.M. Fischer, Professor
Medical University of Vienna
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2026
First Posted
April 6, 2026
Study Start
April 21, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 12, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 12, 2026
Last Updated
April 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- IPD will be made available at the time of publication of the primary results article, as a supplementary file.
- Access Criteria
- All individuals who have access to the published article will be able to access the individual participant data (IPD) and supporting information as supplementary material. No special request or data use agreement is required.
De-identified individual participant data (IPD), including pain ratings, time- stamped injection responses, and basic demographics (age, sex), will be shared alongside the publication of the primary results. Only data used in the main publication and relevant supplementary analyses will be included.