Mechanisms of Pain Hypersensitivity in a Human Skin Inflammation Model
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main goal of this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study is to understand the molecular mechanisms of inflammation-induced increased pain sensitivity (hyperalgesia). These mechanisms are studied using a recently established human model of skin inflammation that mimics aspects of skin infection. A localized inflammatory response in the skin of healthy volunteers is elicited by locally injecting a small, safe dose of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a major component of gram-negative bacteria. The study addresses three key research questions:
- Role of RAGE: To investigate if certain inflammatory effects of LPS, which contribute to hyperalgesia, are mediated by a signaling pathway involving the RAGE receptor.
- Pain Sensitization: To examine how skin inflammation affects pain caused by acidic stimuli, and to differentiate this from purely mechanical pain.
- Role of TRPV1: To determine if the contribution of the TRPV1 ion channel to acid-induced pain is different in inflamed skin. Participants will undergo an experimental session 4.5 hours after LPS injection to measure skin blood flow (using laser speckle imaging), mechanical pain sensitivity (using specialized tweezers), and pain induced by injecting a solution, of which the pH is gradually decreasing (acid-induced pain). The study has minimal risks due to the small, safe doses of substances used ('microdosing') and aims to lay the groundwork for developing new treatments for inflammatory pain conditions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1 pain
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for early_phase_1 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 17, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 11, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 11, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2025
CompletedJuly 29, 2025
July 1, 2025
24 days
June 11, 2025
July 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Skin Perfusion
The degree of hyperemia, quantified by laser speckle imaging, will be analyzed using ImageJ. The following steps describe the protocol for analyzing the (non-)inflamed spots of one forearm of a subject. To determine the volume under the surface (VUS, in analogy to an area under the curve, but for a 2-dimensional signal) of the flux change, for each of the previously injected skin spots a ROI covering the flow increase is adapted. The flux change (Δflux) is determined by subtracting from the average of the ROI the average signal of the surrounding forearm, and multiplying this with the ROI area. Any widespread or systemic change, which is not expected to occur, would be present in both the test site and the surrounding forearm and would therefore be corrected for by the chosen analysis approach. The analyzing person will be blinded concerning the type of injection. The variable is measured in arbitrary units (A.U.).
4.5h after the (non-)LPS injections
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain AUC
Between 4.5h and 5.5h after the (non-)LPS injections
Study Arms (10)
Sequence #01
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive 10 intradermal injetions at time point -4.5h, of which 3 contain no substance (SIF), 3 contain LPS, 2 contain LPS + AZE and 2 contain LPS + RES. This is followed by laser speckle imaging (all skin spots), mechanical stimulation (all skin spots) and injection of neutral OR acidic solutions, containing OR not containing BCTC (stated in parantheses) at time point 0. The order is as follows: 1. SIF (neutral pH) 2. SIF (acidic pH) 3. LPS + RES (acidic pH) 4. SIF (acidic pH + BCTC) 5. LPS + RES (neutral pH) 6. LPS (neutral pH) 7. LPS + AZE (acidic pH) 8. LPS (acidic pH) 9. LPS + AZE (neutral pH) 10. LPS (acidic pH + BCTC)
Sequence #03
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive 10 intradermal injetions at time point -4.5h, of which 3 contain no substance (SIF), 3 contain LPS, 2 contain LPS + AZE and 2 contain LPS + RES. This is followed by laser speckle imaging (all skin spots), mechanical stimulation (all skin spots) and injection of neutral OR acidic solutions, containing OR not containing BCTC (stated in parantheses) at time point 0. The order is as follows: 1. SIF (acidic pH + BCTC) 2. LPS (neutral pH) 3. SIF (acidic pH) 4. LPS (acidic pH) 5. SIF (neutral pH) 6. LPS (acidic pH + BCTC) 7. LPS + RES (acidic pH) 8. LPS + AZE (neutral pH) 9. LPS + RES (neutral pH) 10. LPS + AZE (acidic pH)
Sequence #04
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive 10 intradermal injetions at time point -4.5h, of which 3 contain no substance (SIF), 3 contain LPS, 2 contain LPS + AZE and 2 contain LPS + RES. This is followed by laser speckle imaging (all skin spots), mechanical stimulation (all skin spots) and injection of neutral OR acidic solutions, containing OR not containing BCTC (stated in parantheses) at time point 0. The order is as follows: 1. LPS (neutral pH) 2. LPS (acidic pH) 3. SIF (acidic pH + BCTC) 4. LPS (acidic pH + BCTC) 5. SIF (acidic pH) 6. LPS + AZE (neutral pH) 7. SIF (neutral pH) 8. LPS + AZE (acidic pH) 9. LPS + RES (acidic pH) 10. LPS + RES (neutral pH)
Sequence #05
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive 10 intradermal injetions at time point -4.5h, of which 3 contain no substance (SIF), 3 contain LPS, 2 contain LPS + AZE and 2 contain LPS + RES. This is followed by laser speckle imaging (all skin spots), mechanical stimulation (all skin spots) and injection of neutral OR acidic solutions, containing OR not containing BCTC (stated in parantheses) at time point 0. The order is as follows: 1. LPS (acidic pH) 2. LPS (acidic pH + BCTC) 3. LPS (neutral pH) 4. LPS + AZE (neutral pH) 5. SIF (acidic pH + BCTC) 6. LPS + AZE (acidic pH) 7. SIF (acidic pH) 8. LPS + RES (neutral pH) 9. SIF (neutral pH) 10. LPS + RES (acidic pH)
Sequence #06
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive 10 intradermal injetions at time point -4.5h, of which 3 contain no substance (SIF), 3 contain LPS, 2 contain LPS + AZE and 2 contain LPS + RES. This is followed by laser speckle imaging (all skin spots), mechanical stimulation (all skin spots) and injection of neutral OR acidic solutions, containing OR not containing BCTC (stated in parantheses) at time point 0. The order is as follows: 1. LPS (acidic pH + BCTC) 2. LPS + AZE (neutral pH) 3. LPS (acidic pH) 4. LPS + AZE (acidic pH) 5. LPS (neutral pH) 6. LPS + RES (neutral pH) 7. SIF (acidic pH + BCTC) 8. LPS + RES (acidic pH) 9. SIF (acidic pH) 10. SIF (neutral pH)
Sequence #07
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive 10 intradermal injetions at time point -4.5h, of which 3 contain no substance (SIF), 3 contain LPS, 2 contain LPS + AZE and 2 contain LPS + RES. This is followed by laser speckle imaging (all skin spots), mechanical stimulation (all skin spots) and injection of neutral OR acidic solutions, containing OR not containing BCTC (stated in parantheses) at time point 0. The order is as follows: 1. LPS + AZE (neutral pH) 2. LPS + AZE (acidic pH) 3. LPS (acidic pH + BCTC) 4. LPS + RES (neutral pH) 5. LPS (acidic pH) 6. LPS + RES (acidic pH) 7. LPS (neutral pH) 8. SIF (neutral pH) 9. SIF (acidic pH + BCTC) 10. SIF (acidic pH)
Sequence #08
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive 10 intradermal injetions at time point -4.5h, of which 3 contain no substance (SIF), 3 contain LPS, 2 contain LPS + AZE and 2 contain LPS + RES. This is followed by laser speckle imaging (all skin spots), mechanical stimulation (all skin spots) and injection of neutral OR acidic solutions, containing OR not containing BCTC (stated in parantheses) at time point 0. The order is as follows: 1. LPS + AZE (acidic pH) 2. LPS + RES (neutral pH) 3. LPS + AZE (neutral pH) 4. LPS + RES (acidic pH) 5. LPS (acidic pH + BCTC) 6. SIF (neutral pH) 7. LPS (acidic pH) 8. SIF (acidic pH) 9. LPS (neutral pH) 10. SIF (acidic pH + BCTC)
Sequence #09
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive 10 intradermal injetions at time point -4.5h, of which 3 contain no substance (SIF), 3 contain LPS, 2 contain LPS + AZE and 2 contain LPS + RES. This is followed by laser speckle imaging (all skin spots), mechanical stimulation (all skin spots) and injection of neutral OR acidic solutions, containing OR not containing BCTC (stated in parantheses) at time point 0. The order is as follows: 1. LPS + RES (neutral pH) 2. LPS + RES (acidic pH) 3. LPS + AZE (acidic pH) 4. SIF (neutral pH) 5. LPS + AZE (neutral pH) 6. SIF (acidic pH) 7. LPS (acidic pH + BCTC) 8. SIF (acidic pH + BCTC) 9. LPS (acidic pH) 10. LPS (neutral pH)
Sequence #10
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive 10 intradermal injetions at time point -4.5h, of which 3 contain no substance (SIF), 3 contain LPS, 2 contain LPS + AZE and 2 contain LPS + RES. This is followed by laser speckle imaging (all skin spots), mechanical stimulation (all skin spots) and injection of neutral OR acidic solutions, containing OR not containing BCTC (stated in parantheses) at time point 0. The order is as follows: 1. LPS + RES (acidic pH) 2. SIF (neutral pH) 3. LPS + RES (neutral pH) 4. SIF (acidic pH) 5. LPS + AZE (acidic pH) 6. SIF (acidic pH + BCTC) 7. LPS + AZE (neutral pH) 8. LPS (neutral pH) 9. LPS (acidic pH + BCTC) 10. LPS (acidic pH)
Sequence #02
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive 10 intradermal injetions at time point -4.5h, of which 3 contain no substance (SIF), 3 contain LPS, 2 contain LPS + AZE and 2 contain LPS + RES. This is followed by laser speckle imaging (all skin spots), mechanical stimulation (all skin spots) and injection of neutral OR acidic solutions, containing OR not containing BCTC (stated in parantheses) at time point 0. The order is as follows: 1. SIF (acidic pH) 2. SIF (acidic pH + BCTC) 3. SIF (neutral pH) 4. LPS (neutral pH) 5. LPS + RES (acidic pH) 6. LPS (acidic pH) 7. LPS + RES (neutral pH) 8. LPS (acidic pH + BCTC) 9. LPS + AZE (acidic pH) 10. LPS + AZE (neutral pH)
Interventions
Intradermal injection of SIF at time point -4.5h, followed by laser speckle imaging, mechanical stimulation and intradermal injection of SIF with neutral pH (pH 7.4)
Intradermal injection of SIF at time point -4.5h, followed by laser speckle imaging, mechanical stimulation and intradermal injection of SIF with acidic pH (pH 7.4 to pH 5.7)
Intradermal injection of SIF at time point -4.5h, followed by laser speckle imaging, mechanical stimulation and intradermal injection of SIF with acidic pH (pH 7.4 to pH 5.7), containing BCTC 1 µM
Intradermal injection of LPS 5 ng at time point -4.5h, followed by laser speckle imaging, mechanical stimulation and intradermal injection of SIF with neutral pH (pH 7.4)
Intradermal injection of LPS 5 ng at time point -4.5h, followed by laser speckle imaging, mechanical stimulation and intradermal injection of SIF with acidic pH (pH 7.4 to pH 5.7)
Intradermal injection of LPS 5 ng at time point -4.5h, followed by laser speckle imaging, mechanical stimulation and intradermal injection of SIF with acidic pH (pH 7.4 to pH 5.7), containing BCTC 1 µM
Intradermal injection of LPS 5 ng + Azeliragon 100 µM at time point -4.5h, followed by laser speckle imaging, mechanical stimulation and intradermal injection of SIF with neutral pH (pH 7.4)
Intradermal injection of LPS 5 ng + Azeliragon 100 µM at time point -4.5h, followed by laser speckle imaging, mechanical stimulation and intradermal injection of SIF with acidic pH (pH 7.4 to 5.7)
Intradermal injection of LPS 5 ng + Resatorvid 10 µM at time point -4.5h, followed by laser speckle imaging, mechanical stimulation and intradermal injection of SIF with neutral pH (pH 7.4)
Intradermal injection of LPS 5 ng + Resatorvid 10 µM at time point -4.5h, followed by laser speckle imaging, mechanical stimulation and intradermal injection of SIF with neutral pH (pH 7.4 to pH 5.7)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 70 years
- Full legal capacity
You may not qualify if:
- Participant of another study, ongoing or within the last four weeks
- Current medication intake (except hormonal contraception) or drug abuse
- Female subjects: Positive pregnancy test or breastfeeding
- Body temperature above 38°C, diagnostically verified
- Known allergic diseases, in particular asthmatic disorders and skin diseases
- Sensory deficit, skin disease or hematoma of unknown origin in the physical examination of the test site
- Symptoms indicating respiratory tract infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stefan Heberlead
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
Related Publications (12)
Schwarz MG, Namer B, Reeh PW, Fischer MJM. TRPA1 and TRPV1 Antagonists Do Not Inhibit Human Acidosis-Induced Pain. J Pain. 2017 May;18(5):526-534. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.12.011. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
PMID: 28062311BACKGROUNDLi J, Wang K, Huang B, Li R, Wang X, Zhang H, Tang H, Chen X. The receptor for advanced glycation end products mediates dysfunction of airway epithelial barrier in a lipopolysaccharides-induced murine acute lung injury model. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 Apr;93:107419. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107419. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
PMID: 33548580BACKGROUNDKawamoto T, Ii M, Kitazaki T, Iizawa Y, Kimura H. TAK-242 selectively suppresses Toll-like receptor 4-signaling mediated by the intracellular domain. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008 Apr 14;584(1):40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.01.026. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
PMID: 18299127BACKGROUNDRice TW, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Angus DC, Aikawa N, Demeyer I, Sainati S, Amlot N, Cao C, Ii M, Matsuda H, Mouri K, Cohen J. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of TAK-242 for the treatment of severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2010 Aug;38(8):1685-94. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e7c5c9.
PMID: 20562702BACKGROUNDKiers D, Leijte GP, Gerretsen J, Zwaag J, Kox M, Pickkers P. Comparison of different lots of endotoxin and evaluation of in vivo potency over time in the experimental human endotoxemia model. Innate Immun. 2019 Jan;25(1):34-45. doi: 10.1177/1753425918819754.
PMID: 30782041BACKGROUNDSuffredini AF, Hochstein HD, McMahon FG. Dose-related inflammatory effects of intravenous endotoxin in humans: evaluation of a new clinical lot of Escherichia coli O:113 endotoxin. J Infect Dis. 1999 May;179(5):1278-82. doi: 10.1086/314717.
PMID: 10191237BACKGROUNDBretag AH. Synthetic interstitial fluid for isolated mammalian tissue. Life Sci. 1969 Mar 1;8(5):319-29. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(69)90283-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 5781321BACKGROUNDHeber S, Ciotu CI, Hartner G, Gold-Binder M, Ninidze N, Gleiss A, Kress HG, Fischer MJM. TRPV1 antagonist BCTC inhibits pH 6.0-induced pain in human skin. Pain. 2020 Jul;161(7):1532-1541. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001848.
PMID: 32107360BACKGROUNDNair M, Jagadeeshan S, Katselis G, Luan X, Momeni Z, Henao-Romero N, Chumala P, Tam JS, Yamamoto Y, Ianowski JP, Campanucci VA. Lipopolysaccharides induce a RAGE-mediated sensitization of sensory neurons and fluid hypersecretion in the upper airways. Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 16;11(1):8336. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86069-6.
PMID: 33863932BACKGROUNDYamamoto Y, Harashima A, Saito H, Tsuneyama K, Munesue S, Motoyoshi S, Han D, Watanabe T, Asano M, Takasawa S, Okamoto H, Shimura S, Karasawa T, Yonekura H, Yamamoto H. Septic shock is associated with receptor for advanced glycation end products ligation of LPS. J Immunol. 2011 Mar 1;186(5):3248-57. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002253. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
PMID: 21270403BACKGROUNDButers TP, Hameeteman PW, Jansen IME, van Hindevoort FC, Ten Voorde W, Grievink HW, Schoonakker M, de Kam ML, Gilroy DW, Feiss G, Rissmann R, Jansen MAA, Burggraaf J, Moerland M. Clinical, Cellular, and Molecular Effects of Corticosteroids on the Response to Intradermal Lipopolysaccharide Administration in Healthy Volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Apr;111(4):964-971. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2516. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
PMID: 34935141BACKGROUNDButers TP, Hameeteman PW, Jansen IME, van Hindevoort FC, Ten Voorde W, Florencia E, Osse M, de Kam ML, Grievink HW, Schoonakker M, Patel AA, Yona S, Gilroy DW, Lubberts E, Damman J, Feiss G, Rissmann R, Jansen MAA, Burggraaf J, Moerland M. Intradermal lipopolysaccharide challenge as an acute in vivo inflammatory model in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;88(2):680-690. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14999. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
PMID: 34293819BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- To ensure double-blind conditions, all solutions are prepared and numbered by an independent laboratory technician who is not involved in the experiment. Both the participants and the experimenter are blinded to the injected substances (LPS, Azeliragon, Resatorvid, BCTC) and to whether solutions contain neutral or acidic solutions for the acid-induced pain model. Familiarization injections are administered unblinded for safety and tolerability assessment. Blinding is maintained until the end of each subject's participation. Randomization sequences are generated and stored separately and are only accessible to unblinded personnel in case of emergency.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2025
First Posted
July 29, 2025
Study Start
June 17, 2025
Primary Completion
July 11, 2025
Study Completion
July 11, 2025
Last Updated
July 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- IPD will be made available at the time of publication of the primary results article, as a supplementary file.
- Access Criteria
- All individuals who have access to the published article will be able to access the individual participant data (IPD) and supporting information as supplementary material. No special request or data use agreement is required.
De-identified individual participant data (IPD), including pain ratings, time- stamped injection responses, and basic demographics (age, sex), will be shared after publication of the primary results. Only data used in the main publication and relevant supplementary analyses will be included.